What does a research hierachy looks like

Earlier than you get began with this task, please full the Research Hierarchy Activity to supply context for the task.

Now that you’ve accomplished the Analysis Hierarchy exercise, you possibly can see how every kind of analysis suits in a specific hierarchy. That is essential as a result of it gives details about every kind of analysis examine: its validity, rigor, soundness, reliability, and so forth. With this context in thoughts, you’ll now study the twenty articles supplied right here to provide you follow in figuring out which article goes with every stage of analysis hierarchy.

Overview

Here’s a record of twenty nursing journal articles which are obtainable to you thru the Regis Library. These articles are from a variety of examine varieties; from randomized managed trials (RCT) to skilled opinions.

• Cotton, B. P., & Ferszt, G. G. (2018). The role of NPs in medication-assisted treatment for opioid use disorder. Nurse Practitioner, 43(5), eight.
• Currie, E. R., Christian, B. J., Hinds, P. S., Perna, S. J., Robinson, C., Day, S., & Meneses, Ok. (2016). Parent perspectives of neonatal intensive care at the end-of-life. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 31(5), 478–489.
• Dai, Y., & Livesley, J. (2018). A mixed‐method systematic review of the effectiveness and acceptability of preoperative psychological preparation programmes to reduce paediatric preoperative anxiety in elective surgery. Journal of Superior Nursing, 74(9), 2022–2037.
• Goh, M. L., Ang, E. N. Ok., Hong-Gu H., Chan, Y., & Vehviläinen-Julkunen, Ok. (2018). Patient satisfaction is linked to nursing workload in a Singapore hospital. Scientific Nursing Analysis, 27(6), 692–713.
• Górska, S., Forsyth, Ok., & Maciver, D. (2018). Living with dementia: A meta-synthesis of qualitative research on the lived experience. Gerontologist, 58(three), e180–e196.
• Griffiths, P., Recio-Saucedo, A., Dall’Ora, C., Briggs, J., Maruotti, A., Meredith, P.,…Ball, J. (2018). The association between nurse staffing and omissions in nursing care: A systematic review. Journal of Superior Nursing, 74(7), 1474–1487.
• Guirguis-Blake, J. M., Michael, Y. L., Perdue, L. A., Coppola, E. L., & Beil, T. L. (2018). Interventions to prevent falls in older adults: Updated evidence report and systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Journal of the American Medical Affiliation, 319(16), 1705–1716.
• Harvey, E. M., Freeman, D., Wright, A., Tub, J., Peters, V. Ok., Meadows, G.,…Collier, B. R. (2019). Impact of advanced nurse teamwork training on trauma team performance. Scientific Simulation in Nursing, 30, 7–15.
• Hooper L., Abdelhamid A., Bunn D., Brown T., Summerbell C. D., & Skeaff C. M. (2015). Effects of total fat intake on body weight. Cochrane Database of Systematic Evaluations, (eight), 1-213.
• Jokh Chaaya, D. A., de Souza Nogueira, L., de Cassia Gengo e Silva Butcher, R., Reboreda, J. Z., Silva Bonfim, A. Ok., & Padilha, Ok. G. (2018). Pulse pressure and mortality risk in critically ill patients. AACN Superior Crucial Care, 29(2), 118–125.
• King, A. J. L., Johnson, R., Cramer, H., Purdy, S., & Huntley, A. L. (2018). Community case management and unplanned hospital admissions in patients with heart failure: A systematic review and qualitative evidence synthesis. Journal of Superior Nursing, 74(7), 1463–1473.
• Li, H., Shao, Y., Xing, Z., Li, Y., Wang, S., Zhang, M.,…Solar, J. (2019). Napping on night‐shifts among nursing staff: A mixed‐methods systematic review. Journal of Superior Nursing, 75(2), 291–312.
• Lök, N., Bademli, Ok., & Canbaz, M. (2018). The effects of anger management education on adolescents’ manner of displaying anger and self-esteem: A randomized controlled trial. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, 32(1), 75–81.
• Mabire, C., Dwyer, A., Garnier, A., & Pellet, J. (2018). Meta-analysis of the effectiveness of nursing discharge planning interventions for older inpatients discharged home. Journal of Superior Nursing, 74(four), 788–799.
• Milligan, F., Martinez, F., Aal, S. H. M. A., Ahmed, S. A., Joby, B., Matalam, J. S.,…Melepeedikayil, S. S. (2018). Assessing anxiety and depression in cancer patients. British Journal of Nursing, 27(10), S18–S23.
• Moxley, E. W., Smith, D., Quinn, L., & Park, C. (2018). Relationships between glycemic control and cardiovascular fitness. Organic Analysis for Nursing, 20(four), 422–428.
• Rahimimoghadam, Z., Rahemi, Z., Sadat, Z., & Mirbagher Ajorpaz, N. (2019). Pilates exercises and quality of life of patients with chronic kidney disease. Complementary Therapies in Scientific Follow, 34, 35–40.
• Sasso, L., Hayter, M., Catania, G., Aleo, G., Zanini, M., & Bagnasco, A. (2019). Including qualitative research in randomized controlled trials: Opportunities for nursing researchers. Journal of Superior Nursing, 75(four), 705–706.
• VonStein, M., Buchko, B. L., Millen, C., Lampo, D., Bell, T., & Woods, A. B. (2019). Effect of a scheduled nurse intervention on thirst and dry mouth in intensive care patients. American Journal of Crucial Care, 28(1), 41–46.
• Yeom, H.-E. (2018). Gender differences in climacteric symptoms and associated factors in Korean men and women. Utilized Nursing Analysis, 41, 21–28.

Task Directions

• Assessment all the articles in preparation for this task. Utilizing this Research Hierarchy Template (Word), you’ll record one journal article for every of the seven ranges of the analysis hierarchy pyramid (you’ll not want to make use of all twenty articles to finish the hierarchy; you’ll use a complete of seven of the twenty articles). Articles is not going to be utilized in greater than a single hierarchy stage.
• After you might have decided one journal article that corresponds with every of the degrees of the hierarchy, present a one to two sentence assertion for every article to elucidate your rationale for choosing it and assigning it to that hierarchical stage. You’ll write one to two sentences, justifying your choice, utilizing the Analysis Hierarchy doc that you just submit.

Please check with the Grading Rubric for particulars on how this exercise can be graded.

To Submit Your Task:

Writing Task Rubric

Notice: Scholarly assets are outlined as evidence-based follow, peer-reviewed journals; textbook (don’t rely solely in your textbook as a reference); and Nationwide Commonplace Pointers. Assessment task directions, as this can present any further necessities that aren’t particularly listed on the rubric.

Writing Task Rubric – 100 PointsCriteriaExemplary
Exceeds ExpectationsAdvanced
Meets ExpectationsIntermediate
Wants ImprovementNovice
InadequateTotal PointsContent of PaperThe author demonstrates a well-articulated understanding of the subject material in a transparent, advanced, and informative method. The paper content material and theories are nicely developed and linked to the paper necessities and sensible expertise. The paper contains related materials that fulfills all targets of the paper.

Cites 5 or extra references, utilizing at the very least two new scholarly assets that weren’t supplied within the course supplies.

All instruction necessities famous.

30 factorsThe author demonstrates an understanding of the subject material, and parts of the paper are precisely represented with explanations and utility of information to incorporate evidence-based follow, ethics, concept, and/or function. Course supplies and scholarly assets help required ideas. The paper contains related materials that fulfills all targets of the paper.

Cites 4 references.

All instruction necessities famous.

26 factorsThe author demonstrates a reasonable understanding of the subject material as evidenced by parts of the paper being summarized with minimal utility to evidence-based follow, concept, or role-development. Course content material is current however lacking depth and or improvement.

Cites three references.

Most instruction necessities are famous.

23 factorsAbsent utility to evidence-based follow, concept, or function improvement. Use in fact content material is superficial.

Demonstrates incomplete understanding of content material and/or insufficient preparation.

Content material of paper is inaccurately portrayed or lacking.

Cites two or fewer references.

Lacking some instruction necessities.

20 factors30Evaluation and Synthesis of Paper Content material and MeaningThrough vital evaluation, the submitted paper gives an correct, clear, concise, and full presentation of the required content material.

Info from scholarly assets is synthesized, offering new info or perception associated to the context of the task by offering each supportive and different info or viewpoints.

All instruction necessities famous.

30 factorsPaper is full, offering proof of additional synthesis in fact content material by way of scholarly assets.

Info is synthesized to assist fulfill paper necessities. The content material helps at the very least one viewpoint.

All instruction necessities famous.

26 factorsPaper lacks clarification or new info. Scholarly reference helps the content material with out including any new info or perception. The paper’s content material could also be complicated or unclear, and the abstract could also be incomplete.

Most instruction necessities are famous.

23 factorsSubmission is primarily a summation of the task with out additional synthesis in fact content material or evaluation of the situation.

Demonstrates incomplete understanding of content material and/or insufficient preparation.

Lacking some instruction necessities.

Submits task late.

20 factors30Utility of KnowledgeThe abstract of the paper gives info validated by way of scholarly assets that supply a multidisciplinary strategy.

The coed’s utility in follow is correct and believable, and extra scholarly useful resource(s) supporting the applying is supplied.

All questions posed throughout the task are answered in a well-developed method with citations for validation.

All instruction necessities famous.

30 factorsA abstract of the paper’s content material, findings, and data gained from the task is offered.

Scholar signifies how the data can be used inside their skilled follow.

All instruction necessities famous.

26 factorsGoal standards aren’t clearly used, permitting for a extra superficial utility of content material between the task and the broader course content material.

Scholar’s indication of how they are going to apply this new data to their medical follow is imprecise.

Most instruction necessities are famous.

23 factorsThe applying of information is considerably missing.

Scholar’s indication of how they are going to apply this new data to their medical follow will not be sensible or possible.

Demonstrates incomplete understanding of content material and/or insufficient preparation.

Utility of information is inaccurate and/or pupil fails to elucidate how the data can be used inside their private follow.

Lacking a number of instruction necessities.

Submits task late.

20 factors30OrganizationWell-organized content material with a transparent and sophisticated goal assertion and content material argument. Writing is concise with a logical move of concepts.

5 factorsOrganized content material with an informative goal assertion and supportive content material and abstract assertion. Argument content material is developed with minimal points in content material move.

four factorsPoor group, and move of concepts distract from content material. Narrative is troublesome to observe and incessantly causes reader to reread work.

Function assertion is famous.

three factorsIllogical move of concepts. Lacking important content material. Prose rambles. Function assertion is unclear or lacking.

Demonstrates incomplete understanding of content material and/or insufficient preparation.

No goal assertion.

Submits task late.

2 points5APA, Grammar, and SpellingCorrect APA formatting with no errors.

The author accurately identifies studying viewers, as demonstrated by acceptable language (avoids jargon and simplifies advanced ideas appropriately).

Writing is concise, in energetic voice, and avoids awkward transitions and overuse of conjunctions.

There aren’t any spelling, punctuation, or word-usage errors

5 factorsRight and constant APA formatting of references and cites all references used. Not more than two distinctive APA errors.

The author demonstrates right utilization of formal English language in sentence development. Variation in sentence construction and phrase utilization promotes readability.

There are minimal to no grammar, punctuation, or word-usage errors.

four factorsThree to 4 distinctive APA formatting errors.

The author sometimes makes use of awkward sentence development or overuses/inappropriately makes use of advanced sentence construction. Issues with phrase utilization (proof of incorrect use of thesaurus) and punctuation persist, typically inflicting some difficulties with grammar. Some phrases, transitional phrases, and conjunctions are overused.

A number of grammar, punctuation, or phrase utilization errors.

three factors5 or extra distinctive formatting errors or no try and format in APA.

The author demonstrates restricted understanding of formal written language use; writing is colloquial (conforms to spoken language).

The author struggles with restricted vocabulary and has problem conveying which means such that solely the broadest, most normal messages are offered.

Grammar and punctuation are persistently incorrect. Spelling errors are quite a few.

Submits task late.

2 points5Whole Factors100