Posted: February 2nd, 2022

MGT601 Dynamic Leadership
Assessment

ASSESSMENT 2 BRIEF
Subject Code and Title MGT601 Dynamic Leadership
Assessment Assessment 2 : Leadership Plan
Individual/Group Individual
Length Up to 3,000 words
Learning Outcomes a) Explore and reflect on self- development as a leader to build self-awareness.
b) Through critical reflection on key leadership theories develop a personal leadership development strategy.
c) Analyse and develop the capacity to influence, motivate and inspire others in your workplace and/or community organisations.
d) Implement and practice coaching others to enhance self-awareness and core communication skills for emotional intelligence, with emphasis on active listening, building empathy, giving and receiving feedback.
e) Demonstrate the technique of reflective and reflexive practice as a means of continuous learning and selfdevelopment.
Submission By 11:55pm AEST/AEDT Friday at end of Module 6 .1 (Week 11)
Weighting 50%
Total Marks 100 marks
Context:
The purpose of all assessments, combined, is to reflect on your own leadership journey, obtain feedback from your assigned partner and other trusted sources, evaluate your current leadership style, effectiveness and potential and then prepare a plan for your continued development as a leader. The assessments are integrated pieces of work and you should draw on the first parts as you work on this final part. The first assessment focused on your journey so far and current capabilities. This final assessment report should present your plans for your future development as a leader.
Your Task:
The task for this assessment is to prepare and present a plan for your development as a leader. The period of your plan could be 2, 5 or 10 years. Select the period that makes most sense to you, depending on the current stage of your life and career. Briefly explain the reason for the time period that you have selected.
Within the body of your report, the model of development that you choose will largely determine the structure and section headings. The precise structure is up to you.
A clear logic flow, using a “Contents” page and section headings, will help your readers to follow your thinking. The use of an “Executive Summary” to summarise the key topics in your report, an “Introduction” to set the context and provide background to the discussion, a “Conclusion” to capture your key learnings is desirable in a business subject.
Detailed, supporting information about your own personal leadership traits such as psychometric results, mentoring with and by other students, personal reflection, planning templates, etc., should be provided.
Note that deep personal reflection lies at the heart of this report and there needs to be recognition of personal change as a result of this reflection.
Please include a section in your report that refers specifically to your preferred organisational culture type
SMART methodology will ensure the details of your plan are both measurable and achievable. These goals must be grounded in your core values and reflect alignment with your authentic leadership behaviors.
Your discussion MUST reflect the topics presented in this course as a minimum. It is expected that students will demonstrate that they understand and can apply the various theoretical perspectives contained in the modules.
Reflexive Writing – First Person:
You should write in the first person, because this is about YOU, your reflections and your interpretations. (eg “I considered this advice to be….. because it had a big impact on my……..and it helped me to understand my………..”).
Try to be as specific as possible, use brief examples to illustrate your points and try to select examples that enable you to demonstrate learning against the attributes in the rubric.
All other principles of academic writing apply, including strict referencing, acknowledgement of the work of others and avoidance of plagiarism.
Referencing:
You should include a list of specific references that you have actually used in your report. For this assessment, a minimum of three journal articles, academic papers or textbooks is expected. References to any secondary sources or web sites are additional. The reference list and Executive Summary (if you choose to use one) and any appendices will not be included in the word count.
It is essential that you use appropriate APA style for citing and referencing research. Please see more information on referencing here http://library.laureate.net.au/research_skills/referencing
Submission Instructions:
Submit your Self-Reflective Analysis in Assessment 2 submission link in the Assessment section found in the main navigation menu of the subject Blackboard site. A rubric will be attached to the assessment. The Learning Facilitator will provide feedback via the Grade Centre in the LMS portal. Feedback can be viewed in My Grades.
Marking Rubric:
Your reports will be marked against the rubric which is show on the next pages. Please ensure that your submission addresses all five of the Assessment Attributes in the rubric.
Learning Rubric: Assessment 2 : Leadership Plan
Assessment Attributes Fail (Unacceptable) 0-49% Pass
(Functional) 50-64% Credit
(Proficient)
65-74% Distinction
(Advanced)
75 -84% High Distinction
(Exceptional) 85-100%
LEADERSHIP
DEVELOPMENT
PLANNING
30% Little or no reference to own aspirations or observations on leadership.
Little or no evidence of a development plan Occasional references to own aspirations and learning about leadership.
Basic plan for development. Frequent references to own leadership aspirations, experiences or observations, with reflection on own learning needs.
Practical plan for development. Frequent and deep reflection on own leadership aspirations and experiences.
Comprehensive and practical plan for development, including new experiences and ‘stretch’ projects. Multiple, deep reflections, on aspirations with significant new insights on own leadership and evidence of changing behaviours.
Comprehensive and practical plan for development, including significant, new experiences and ‘stretch’ projects.
FEEDBACK TO &
FROM OTHERS
20% Little or no evidence of feedback either received or given. Basic description of feedback received and given but with little or no interpretation. Clear description of feedback received and given with useful interpretation and reflection in implications Comprehensive description and analysis of feedback received and given with clearly expressed interpretation of implications and impact. Very insightful presentation of feedback received and given with explicit interpretation of implications and indicators of changing behaviours.
APPLICATION OF
CONCEPTUAL
MODELS OF
DEVELOPMENT
20% Little or no reference to the conceptual frameworks or theoretical models of leadership. Basic coverage of a relevant model or conceptual framework for leadership development. Clear linkage of plan to an appropriate models leadership development. Insightful use and justification of a model of development to inform, enhance and guide personal plan. Inspired use of a development model to expand thinking, planning and implementation of innovative development options.
MGT601_Dynamic Leadership_ Assessment 2 Page 4 of 5
RESEARCH &
REFERENCING
20% Use of core or supplied readings only.
Inadequate referencing. Evidence of some relevant reading and research beyond the core readings.
Adequate referencing. Evidence of substantial, relevant, additional reading and research.
Full referencing Evidence of substantial, additional reading and research with application to own development plan.
Full referencing. Evidence of comprehensive additional reading & research with insightful application to own development plan.
Full and extensive referencing.
WRITTEN
PRESENTATION
10% No clear logic flow or structure.
Difficult to understand. Basic logic flow and structure.
Clear expression of concepts. Mainly correct grammar and spelling.
. Clear logic flow and structure, with table of contents, Introduction, Body and Conclusion.
Clear expression of concepts. Correct grammar and spelling. Excellent logic and structure. Accurate Executive Summary. Conclusion accurately captures key leanings and aspirations.
Clear expression of concepts. Correct grammar and spelling. Excellent logic and structure. Concise, accurate Executive Summary.
Conclusion accurately captures deep learnings and insights and aspirations.
Clear expression of concepts. Correct grammar and spelling.
MGT601_Dynamic Leadership_ Assessment 2 Page 5 of 5
2 BRIEF
MGT601 Leadership Plan – Dynamic Leadership Assessment 2
Individual/Group Individual \sLength Word Count: 3,000+ a) Reflect on your leadership development to increase self-awareness.
b) Develop a personal leadership development strategy based on important leadership ideas.
c) Assess and improve your ability to influence, encourage, and inspire people in your job or community.
Incorporate active listening, establishing empathy, and offering and receiving feedback into your coaching practice.
e) Use reflective and reflexive practice as a tool for lifelong learning and self-development.
Submission Module 6 ends Friday at 11:55pm AEST/AEDT (Week 11)
50/50
Marks total 100
Context:
To analyze your present leadership style, effectiveness, and potential, you must complete all assessments. Your effort on the last portion should build on the preceding parts. It focused on your past experiences and current abilities. This final report should summarize your leadership development goals.
Task:
The aim for this evaluation is to build and present a plan for your development as a leader. Your plan may be for 2, 5, or 10 years. Choose the period that best fits your current life and professional stage. Explain why you choose the time period you did.
The model of development you choose will heavily influence the report’s structure and section names. You decide on the framework.
Incorporating a “Contents” page and section titles will assist readers follow your rationale. In a business report, a “Executive Summary” summarizes the report’s essential points, a “Introduction” sets the scene and introduces the issue, and a “Conclusion” summarizes your major takeaways.
Detailed information about your own personal leadership traits should be provided, such as psychometric results, student mentoring, personal reflection, planning templates, etc.
This report requires significant personal reflection and acknowledgement of personal transformation as a result of that reflection.
Please dedicate a section of your report to your preferred organizational culture.
The SMART technique ensures your plan is measurable and doable. These objectives must be based on your core values and align with your authentic leadership style.
Your conversation MUST include at least one of the course’s subjects. Students are expected to understand and apply the numerous theoretical viewpoints presented in the modules.
Self-Reflexive Writing:
Because this is about YOU, your reflections, and interpretations, write in the first person. The advise had a huge impact on my…….. and helped me grasp my……..
If you can, choose examples that allow you to demonstrate learning against the criteria in the rubric.
Other academic writing rules apply, such as referencing, acknowledging others’ work, and avoiding plagiarism.
Sources: Include a list of specific references utilized in your report. Three journal articles, academic papers, or textbooks are required for this evaluation. These are extra sources or websites. The reference list, Executive Summary, and any appendices are not included in the word count.
You must utilize APA style for citing and referencing research. Visit http://library.laureate.net/research skills/referencing for further information.
Submission:
Submit your Self-Reflective Analysis via the Assessment 2 submission link on the subject Blackboard site’s main navigation menu. The assessment will include a rubric. They will give comments using the Grade Centre in the LMS. My Grades has feedback.
Your reports will be graded using the rubric shown below. Please address all five Assessment Attributes in the rubric.
Rubric: 2 : Leadership Plan Attributes flop (Unacceptable) 0-49% Pass (Functional) 50-64 % Credit (Proficient)
65-74 % Distinction (Advanced)
75-84 % Distinction (Exceptional) 85-100 %
LEADERSHIP \sDEVELOPMENT \sPLANNING
30 % No mention of own leadership objectives or observations.
No evidence of a development strategy Occasional references to own goals and leadership development.
Basic development plan Own leadership aspirations, experiences, or observations frequently referenced with reflection on own learning needs.
Concrete development plan Reflection on one’s own leadership objectives and experiences
Detailed development plan with new experiences and ‘stretch’ projects. Reflexions on aspirations, fresh thoughts on leadership, and evidence of shifting behaviors.
Detailed development plan with substantial new experiences and ‘stretch’ projects.
FEEDBACK FROM OTHERS 20% No sign of either received or supplied feedback. Basic feedback description with little or no interpretation. Insightful interpretation of feedback and implications In-depth explanation and analysis of feedback with clear understanding of implications and impacts. I like how you offer the input you’ve received and how you present it.
USE OF DEVELOPMENT MODELS
20% Little or little reference to leadership intellectual frameworks or theories. Coverage of a relevant leadership model or framework. Plan clearly linked to leadership development approaches. Use of a model of development to inform, enrich, and guide a personal strategy. Using a development model to inspire new ideas, planning, and implementation.
Dynamic Leadership Assessment 2 (MGT601)
RESEARCH & RESEARCH
20% Only core or supplied readings.
Inadequate citation Extra reading and research beyond the main readings.
Proper citation. Evidence of additional reading and research.
citations Evidence of extra reading and study related to individual development plan.
Full citation. Evidence of extensive additional reading and study relevant to individual growth plan.
Detailed referencing.
WRITTEN \sPRESENTATION
10% The logic is unclear.
Difficult to grasp. Logic and structure basics.
Conceptual clarity. Correct grammar and spelling. Table of contents, Introduction, Body, and Conclusion.
Conceptual clarity. Correct grammatical and s Great structure and rationale. True Executive Summary Concluding remarks appropriately reflect key values.
Conceptual clarity. Correct grammatical and s Great structure and rationale. A concise Executive Summary.
Concluding remarks perfectly capture deep learnings.
Conceptual clarity. Correct grammatical and s
Dynamic Leadership Assessment 2 (MGT601)

Check Price Discount

More Assignment Samples: 4COSC003W Trends in Computer Science »MGT604 Strategic Management Assessment