Posted: February 2nd, 2022

BCOM101 Unit Title: Business Communication Assessment

ASSESSMENT BRIEF three
COURSE: Bachelor of Enterprise / Bachelor of Accounting
Unit Code: BCOM101
Unit Title: Enterprise Communication
Kind of Evaluation: Evaluation three – Particular person Essay and Self- Reflective Abstract ( feed-forward train)
Size/Period: Essay – 1,000 phrases
Self-Reflective Abstract (feed-forward train) – 500 phrases
Unit Studying Outcomes addressed: 1. Clarify communication as a posh course of and the function of various components and parts in that course of
2. Clarify the significance of efficient communication within the enterprise atmosphere
three. Undertake analysis, critically analyse info, and current findings
four. Develop and current arguments for enterprise choices
Submission Date: Essay due Week 7
Self-Reflective Abstract (feed-forward train )due Week 10
Evaluation Activity: Half 1 – Essay
An argumentative educational essay on certainly one of three given matters associated to communication. The essay might be written in accordance with the rules for writing educational essays at ALS Essay Writing Handbook. Half 2 – Self-Reflective Abstract (feed- ahead train)
A self-reflective abstract the place college students replicate on the educational and actions to be taken from their essay suggestions (500 phrases).
Whole Mark: Essay: 100 marks
Self-Reflective Abstract (feed-forward train): 100 marks
Weighting: Essay- 20%
Self-Reflective Abstract (feed-forward train) – 10%
College students are suggested that submission of an Evaluation Activity previous the due date with out a formally signed permitted Project Extension Kind (Kent Web site MyKent Pupil Hyperlink FORM – Project
Extension Utility Kind – Pupil Login Required) or beforehand permitted software for different extenuating circumstances impacting course of research, incurs a 5% penalty per calendar day, calculated by deduction from the entire mark.
For instance. An Evaluation Activity marked out of 40 will incur a 2 mark penalty for every calendar day.
Extra info, please discuss with (Kent Web site MyKent Pupil Hyperlink POLICY – Evaluation Coverage & Procedures – Pupil Login Required)
ASSESSMENT DESCRIPTION:
1. ESSAY
Write an argumentative essay agreeing or disagreeing with one of many statements beneath: 1. Range within the office decreases workforce productiveness OR
2. Not all conflicts inside the group have damaging influence within the efficiency of the group.
OR
three. Unfavorable suggestions in organizations leads to the demotivation of the particular person or group.
Your essay should embrace:
• At the least FIVE peer reviewed educational reference sources, together with the prescribed textual content guide, none of that are web sources, e.g. web sites.
• Right argumentative essay construction. Seek advice from the Educational Studying Expertise pupil information on Essay Writing and Dwyer, J 2016, Communication for Enterprise and the Professions, Methods and Expertise, sixth edn, Pearson Training, Australia (pp. 611-621).
• Harvard Australian referencing type for any sources you employ. Seek advice from the Educational Studying Expertise pupil information on Referencing.
2. SELF-REFLECTIVE SUMMARY (FEED- FORWARD EXERCISE)
Learn the in-text feedback and the suggestions offered to your essay task and replicate on the feedback you’ve gotten obtained and the actions you have to apply sooner or later to utilise what you’ve gotten discovered.
ASSESSMENT SUBMISSION:
Each elements of this task must be submitted on-line in Moodle.
The task MUST be submitted electronically in Microsoft Phrase format. Different codecs is probably not readable by markers. Please bear in mind that any assessments submitted in different codecs might be thought of LATE and can lose marks till it’s offered in Phrase.
For help please converse to our Educational Studying Expertise Coordinators, in Sydney (als_syd@kent.edu.au) or in Melbourne (als_mel@kent.edu.au). They may help you with understanding the duty, draft checking, construction, referencing and different assignment-related issues.
MARKING GUIDE (RUBRIC):
The Marking Information for Essay is proven in Appendix A (web page 5).
The Marking Information for Self-Reflective Abstract is proven in Appendix B (web page 6)
GENERAL NOTES FOR ASSESSMENT TASKS
Content material for Evaluation Activity papers ought to incorporate a proper introduction, details and conclusion.
Applicable educational writing and referencing are inevitable educational abilities that you could develop and display in work being offered for evaluation. The content material of top of the range work offered by a pupil should be totally referenced within-text citations and a Reference Record on the finish. Kent strongly recommends you discuss with the Educational Studying Help Workshop supplies obtainable on the Kent Studying Administration System (Moodle). For particulars please click on the hyperlink http://moodle.kent.edu.au/kentmoodle/mod/folder/view.php?id=3606 and obtain the file titled “Harvard Referencing Workbook”. This Moodle Web site is the situation for Workbooks and knowledge that analysis paper writing service are offered to Kent College students within the ALS Workshops carried out in the beginning of every Trimester.
Kent recommends a minimal of FIVE (5) references in work being offered for evaluation. Until in any other case particularly instructed by your Lecturer or as detailed within the Unit Define for the precise Evaluation Activity, any paper with lower than 5 (5) references could also be deemed not assembly a passable customary and probably be failed.
Content material in Evaluation duties that features sources that aren’t correctly referenced in response to the “Harvard Referencing Workbook” might be penalised.
Marks might be deducted for failure to stick to the phrase rely if that is particularly acknowledged for the Evaluation Activity within the Unit Define. As a basic rule there may be an allowable discretionary variance to the phrase rely in that it’s usually accepted pupil might go over or beneath by 10% than the acknowledged size.
GENERAL NOTES FOR REFERENCING
References are assessed for his or her high quality. College students ought to draw on high quality educational sources, reminiscent of books, chapters from edited books, journals and so on. The textbook for the Unit of research can be utilized as a reference, however not the Lecturer Notes. The Assessor will need to see proof pupil is able to conducting their very own analysis. Additionally, as a way to assist Assessors decide a pupil’s understanding of the work they cite, all in-text references (not simply direct quotes) should embrace the precise web page quantity(s) if proven within the authentic. Earlier than making ready your Evaluation Activity or personal contribution, please overview this ‘YouTube’ video (Avoiding Plagiarism by way of Referencing) by clicking on the next hyperlink: hyperlink:
http://moodle.kent.edu.au/kentmoodle/mod/folder/view.php?id=3606
A seek for peer-reviewed journal articles may additionally help college students. These kind of journal articles may be positioned within the on-line journal databases and may be accessed from the Kent Library homepage. Wikipedia, on-line dictionaries and on-line encyclopaedias are acceptable as a place to begin to achieve data a couple of subject, however shouldn’t be over-used – these ought to represent not more than 10% of your complete listing of references/sources. Further info and literature can be utilized the place these are produced by legit sources, reminiscent of authorities departments, analysis institutes such because the Nationwide Well being and Medical Analysis Council (NHMRC), or worldwide organisations such because the World Well being Organisation (WHO). Professional organisations and authorities departments produce peer reviewed studies and articles and are due to this fact very helpful and principally very present. The content material of the next hyperlink explains why it’s not acceptable to make use of non-peer reviewed web sites (Why cannot I simply Google?): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N39mnu1Pkgw (thanks to La Trobe College for entry to this video).
APPENDIX A
MARKING GUIDE (RUBRIC): ESSAY
Marking Standards. Fail (Zero-9.9) Move (10-12.5) Credit score (13-14.5) Distinction (15-16.5) Excessive Distinction (17-20)
Analysis
/20 Little proof of analysis.
Sources are lacking, Inappropriate, poorly built-in or missing credibility. Lacks clear hyperlink of sources with
essay. No in textual content citations
A minimal of 5 educational sources. Fundamental use of sources to help concepts, usually effectively built-in, most sources are credible. Could also be weaknesses with paraphrasing or integration /software. Analysis is mostly thorough. Good use of sources to help concepts, principally effectively built-in, sources are credible. Could also be weaknesses with paraphrasing or integration/ software. Thorough analysis is indicated. Excellent use of sources to help concepts, effectively built-in, sources are credible. Could also be minor weaknesses with paraphrasing or integration/software. Thorough analysis is indicated. Skilled use of sources to help concepts, effectively built-in, sources are credible. Very minor, if any, weaknesses with paraphrasing or Integration/software.
Info /
Content material
/20
Essay lacks coherence; subject is poorly addressed; little evaluation.
Essay is mostly coherent; subject is addressed; analyses in affordable depth with some description. There are some inconsistencies and weaknesses with move. Essay is coherent and flows effectively; subject is addressed fairly completely; analyses in appreciable depth. There could also be some inconsistencies and weaknesses with move. Essay may be very coherent and flows effectively; subject is addressed completely; analyses in depth. There could also be minor inconsistencies and weak point with move. Skilled work. Essay may be very coherent and flows effectively; subject is addressed completely; analyses in nice depth. Very minor, if any, inconsistencies and weaknesses with move.
Construction
/20 Subject, ideas and thesis will not be clear in introduction. Materials within the physique is mostly poorly sequenced. No discernible conclusion; no hyperlinks to introduction. Subject, ideas and thesis are acknowledged with some readability in introduction. Materials in physique is mostly logically sequenced; some weaknesses. Conclusion doesn’t clearly summarise essay; hyperlinks to introduction will not be clear. Subject, analysis paper writing service ideas and thesis are clearly conveyed in introduction. Materials in physique is logically and clearly sequenced; few or minor weaknesses. Conclusion summarises essay; could also be some weaknesses; usually clear hyperlinks to intro. Subject, ideas and thesis are clearly outlined in introduction. Materials in physique is logically and clearly sequenced; only a few or minor weaknesses. Conclusion principally successfully summarises essay; with suggestions and clear hyperlinks to introduction. Subject, ideas are clearly outlined in introduction. Materials in physique is logically and clearly sequenced; very minor, if any, weaknesses. Conclusion successfully summarises essay; with suggestions and clear hyperlinks to introduction.
Language/
Presentation
/20 Poor customary of writing. Phrase restrict is probably not adhered to. Incorrect format ( e.g. consists of Desk of contents; bullet factors; graphs and so on.) A minimal of 1000 phrases. Fundamental and sound customary of writing; some errors in punctuation, grammar and spelling. Inconsistencies with the formatting. Good customary of writing; few errors in punctuation, grammar and spelling. Nearly appropriate formatting. Excellent customary of writing; only a few or minor errors in punctuation, grammar and spelling. Right formatting. Skilled customary of writing; no errors in punctuation, grammar and spelling. Right formatting.
Referencing
/20 No referencing is obvious or, if performed, is inconsistent and technically incorrect. No or minimal reference listing, blended kinds. No in textual content citations Fundamental and sound try to reference sources; could also be some inconsistencies and technical errors in type. Reference listing is mostly full with 1 or 2 references lacking. Good try to reference sources; inconsistencies and technical errors in type. Few inaccuracies in reference listing and all references listed.
Excellent try to reference sources; very minor inconsistencies and technical errors in type. Thorough and constant reference listing and all references listed.
Skilled stage of referencing and acknowledgment; no errors of favor evident. Thorough and constant reference listing and all references listed.
Kent Institute Australia Pty. Ltd.
Evaluation Transient ABN 49 003 577 302 CRICOS Code: 00161E RTO Code: 90458
Model 2: 11th October, 2019 Web page 5 of 6 TEQSA Supplier Quantity: PRV12051
APPENDIX B
MARKING GUIDE (RUBRIC): SELF REFLECTIVE SUMMARY
Classes Element Rating Feedback
Interpretation of the suggestions obtained.
Clearly and precisely describes and interprets the suggestions given each written, within the essay (in-text feedback) and thru the rubric. 20
Self-disclosure
Seeks to grasp the suggestions by inspecting brazenly your individual experiences prior to now as they relate to the subject, for example factors you make. 20
Methods to make use of the suggestions sooner or later
Synthesize the suggestions and their reflection upon it to develop methods to enhance their essay writing sooner or later 50
Writing Expertise
Cohesiveness, articulation of ideas, evidences of labor, presentation, spelling or grammar errors. 10
Whole Rating 100
Kent Institute Australia Pty. Ltd.
Evaluation Transient ABN 49 003 577 302 CRICOS Code: 00161E RTO Code: 90458
Model 2: 11th October, 2019 Web page 6 of 6 TEQSA Supplier Quantity: PRV12051

Check Price Discount

More Assignment Samples: What does a research hierachy looks like »ASSESSMENT TASK 2 – CASE STUDIES BMA735 Management Ethics