Write an essay on effect of civilization and science fiction
Write an essay on impact of civilization and science fiction1. Your introduction is nice, although you repeat/overuse the "many authors" phrase. Nonetheless, good and clear. Good.2. Para #2 -- undecided what you imply by "many individuals thought that civilization would have a adverse affect for humankind". Which individuals do you take note of, and what points of civilization, and what adverse impacts precisely? It is all a bit imprecise. Additionally, the sudden soar to WWII is complicated -- be mindful your essay is coping with the 1800s. Additionally, did dystopian tales actually pre-date the 20th century in any nice measure?three. Para #three -- undecided why we're going all the best way again to the Greeks. OK, you can also make this argument if you want, nevertheless it does not actually relate to or add to your paper.four. Para #four -- once more, Bacon and the entire Scientific revolution predate the 1800s by a century or extra, so this is not strictly on subject both. As to the "social and technological modifications" of the 1800s, it could tremendously strengthen your case in the event you have been to specify a number of of them!5. Para #5 -- as soon as extra, you should supply some examples. Undecided what you imply by "laborious fiction," despite the fact that you do try and outline it. The ultimate three sentences do not actually make any sense -- what are your attempting to argue right here?6. Para #6 -- you are proper on the affect of electrical energy on the creativeness, byt then (as soon as once more) do not likely develop thbis thought with any precision or illustrations. How did it, for instance, "present mankind with the flexibility to foresee issues that didn't occur because the very first day," no matter these final 9 phrases really seek advice from?? And once more, which authors do you take note of?7. Para #7 -- that is OK, however as soon as extra I am not satisfied it really provides a lot to your argument within the absence of any particular examples.eight. Para #eight -- some extra confusion I am afraid. How do scientific rules contradict the legal guidelines of nature? Do they not, in actual fact, throw mild on the workings of nature that hitherto had been little understood? Did the scientific revolution actually give individuals the flexibility of telepathy and thoughts management -- the place did you get this from?9. The ultimate two paragraphs (pp. 6-7) earlier than the conclusion present some extra promise, however once more (!) with no particular particulars or examples (apart from The Time Machine, which you sadly credit score to H.G. Orwell quite than its creator H.G. Wells). In consequence, by the point we come to the top, I am left with the general impression that you could be properly be proper a lot of the time, however actually have supplied no proof or illustrations to indicate why. That is vital.