weeks 2 thru 5
Ashford three: - Week 2 - Dialogue 1Your preliminary dialogue thread is due on Day three (Thursday) and you've got till Day 7 (Monday) to answer your classmates. Your grade will replicate each the standard of your preliminary submit and the depth of your responses.Affected person RightsYour teacher will assign you one of many following choices by Day 1 of Week Two. In your preliminary dialogue submit, tackle the questions related along with your assigned choice. Embrace the choice quantity within the topic/title line of your submit. You need to use at the least two scholarly sources in your submit. Reply to at the least two classmates utilizing the required response immediate for his or her choice (e.g., in case your preliminary submit was Possibility 1, then reply to posts from Possibility 2 and three or in case your preliminary submit was Possibility 2, then reply to posts from Possibility 1 and three). Your preliminary submit must be at the least 250 phrases; your response submit must be at the least 100 phrases.Possibility 1: Affected person Rights-EuthanasiaFor this selection, you'll check out the ethics surrounding euthanasia (deliberately ending a life to alleviate ache or struggling) and the appropriate to reside versus proper to die arguments that have been current throughout the Teri Schiavo and Karen Ann Quinlan circumstances. To being, view the Craig Ewart at Dignitas (Switzerland), The Terri Schiavo Story , and the Euthanasia-Whose life is it, anyway? movies. Then, analysis and talk about the subject of euthanasia. To your preliminary submit, choose one case (both Teri Schiavo or Karen Ann Quinlan) and one facet of the argument (both proper to reside or proper to die) and clarify how you'll have dealt with this explicit case otherwise with a view to defend the affected person. Your preliminary submit should be a minimal of 250 phrases.Possibility 1 Required Response: No matter your private beliefs, reply to your classmate’s submit by contemplating the alternative facet of their argument. Clarify what the opposite side’s logic was in relation to the identical case your classmate selected (e.g., in case your classmate chosen proper to reside, give the rationale behind the appropriate to die argument for that case). Every response should be a minimal of 100 phrases.Possibility 2: Affected person Rights-Assisted SuicideReview the Dr. Jack Kevorkian’s “60 Minutes” Interview video. Analysis and talk about doctor assisted suicide. Decide a facet on this argument and clarify why you chose that individual facet utilizing scholarly analysis to assist your resolution. Clarify how this view would tackle the case of Dr. Kevorkian? In your submit, clarify whether or not you imagine Dr. Kevorkian was a hero or a assassin? (Bear in mind, there is no such thing as a right reply to this question…however assist your opinion with analysis and details). Your preliminary response must be at the least 250 phrases.Possibility 2 Required Response: No matter your private beliefs, reply to your classmate’s submit by contemplating the alternative facet of their argument. Clarify how this strategy would have an effect on the end result for Dr. Kevorkian. For instance, in case your classmate responded that Dr. Kevorkian was a hero, reply to their submit by explaining the reasoning behind the view that he was a assassin and what that may imply for him. What are the moral rules behind this viewpoint? Your response should comprise at the least 100 phrases.Possibility three: Affected person Rights and PrivacyReview the Digital Well being Information: Privateness and Safety video (transcript). Analysis and talk about digital well being data (EHR). Clarify how EHR are meant to guard the affected person. Talk about any boundaries that will stop needed protections. Your preliminary response must be at the least 250 phrases.Possibility three Required Response: Reply to your classmate’s submit and clarify the idea that EHR may not be capable to absolutely defend the affected person. In what methods may this be higher or worse than paper data? Then, discuss with the boundaries talked about by your classmate and describe the potential insurance policies that might cut back these boundaries. Your response should comprise at the least 100 phrases.Fastidiously overview the Grading Rubric for the factors that shall be used to judge your submit and responses. Reply This part lists choices that can be utilized to view responses. Develop All Print View Present Choices ResponsesResponses are listed under within the following order: response, writer and the date and time the response is posted. Type by Learn/Unread Type by Response Sorted Ascending, click on to type descending Type by Writer Type by Date/Time*Nobody has responded to this subject. To be the primary respondent, click on the Reply hyperlink under the subject.Ashford three: - Week 2 - Dialogue 2Your preliminary dialogue thread is due on Day three (Thursday) and you've got till Day 7 (Monday) to answer your classmates. Your grade will replicate each the standard of your preliminary submit and the depth of your responses.Courtroom DramaYour teacher will choose one of many following court docket circumstances to dramatize on this week’s dialogue board. Your teacher will choose (or ask for volunteers) one scholar to be the “plaintiff” and one scholar to be the “defendant” from the case. The remaining class members will develop into the jury. The plaintiff and defendant are exempt from response submit necessities for this discussion board. They solely must construct a powerful case of their favor through their preliminary video submit. Every participant: the plaintiff, defendant, and jury members, will create their preliminary submit utilizing a YouTube video to elucidate their case and/or reasoning. Overview the YouTube Webcam Fast-Begin Information for directions on easy methods to create a YouTube account and YouTube video submit utilizing your computer’s webcam.Plaintiff (the particular person or entity who's suing one other): Analysis the case and current proof as to the way you have been wronged within the situation. You need to use scholarly sources to assist your case and embody the authorized and moral violations that occurred. You'll assist your go well with by arguing your case in a 5-minute video to the jury. Submit the hyperlink to your video within the dialogue discussion board alongside along with your reference record by the top of Day three.Defendant (the particular person or entity who's being sued by the Plaintiff): Analysis the case and current proof as to the way you didn't act in opposition to authorized and moral requirements. You need to use scholarly sources to assist your case and why the difficulty shouldn't be a violation. You'll assist your go well with by arguing your case in a 5-minute video to the jury. Submit the hyperlink to your video within the dialogue discussion board alongside along with your reference record by the top of Day three.Jurors (the rest of the category): Analysis the case, in addition to the authorized and moral requirements surrounding the problems from each side. View the movies from each the plaintiff and defendant and in your video submit, argue to your resolution; to rule both in favor of the Plaintiff or Defendant. You'll current your resolution in a 5-minute video explaining the rationale behind your resolution. Submit the hyperlink to your video within the dialogue discussion board alongside along with your reference record by Day 5.The Jurors posts are due by Day 5 (Saturday), after viewing the Plaintiff’s and Defendant’s posts from Day three (e.g., the Plaintiff and Defendant should submit by Day three in order that the Jurors have time to reply by Day 5).Juror Response Posts: By the top of Day 7, overview the choices by your fellow jurors. Reply to 2 jurors – one who dominated in favor of the Plaintiff and one who dominated in favor of the Defendant (e.g., if you happen to dominated in favor of the Plaintiff, you have to reply to 1 juror who dominated in favor of the Defendant and one who dominated in favor of the Plaintiff). Talk about your settlement or disagreement with their resolution and current further details to assist your argument. Your responses should be a minimal of 100 phrases. The scholars who portrayed the Plaintiff and the Defendant are exempt from response posts.Choose: Your teacher will function the decide and overview all posts, after which current the ultimate resolution as determined by nearly all of the jurors’ ruling. This ruling shall be posted by Day 1 of Week Three. Feedback concerning the ultimate ruling are inspired, and could also be made throughout the dialogue discussion board past the shut of Week Two.Fastidiously overview the Grading Rubric for the factors that shall be used to judge your submit and responses. Reply This part lists choices that can be utilized to view responses. Develop All Print View Present Choices ResponsesResponses are listed under within the following order: response, writer and the date and time the response is posted. Type by Learn/Unread Type by Response Sorted Ascending, click on to type descending Type by Writer Type by Date/Time*Nobody has responded to this subject. To be the primary respondent, click on the Reply hyperlink under the subject. Ashford three: - Week 2 - AssignmentGenetic InformationReview the Genetic Info Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 (GINA). Then, overview the next Nondiscrimination Act Case Research. Decide whether or not the data introduced inside it might be thought of a violation or a non-violation of the GINA of 2008. Embrace the next in your paper:Write a synopsis of the circumstances mentioned on this doc.Analyze the circumstances beneath examine on this doc by addressing this query: "Ought to the court docket have invalidated civil rights because it did or did the court docket make a poor resolution?" Clarify your reply.Decide whether or not the appropriateness of this resolution relies upon the aim of GINA. Your paper should be two to 3 pages in size, excluding the title and reference pages, and embody at the least two scholarly sources, not together with the course textual content. Your paper and all sources should be formatted and/or cited in line with APA fashion as outlined within the Ashford Writing Middle.For extra info, please discuss with:The Genetic Info Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 (GINA). (2009). Truth Sheet. Retrieved from https://www.studyproessay.com/write-my-paper/dol.gov/ebsa/newsroom/fsGINA.htmlAshford four: - Week three - Dialogue 1Your preliminary dialogue thread is due on Day three (Thursday) and you've got till Day 7 (Monday) to answer your classmates. Your grade will replicate each the standard of your preliminary submit and the depth of your responses.Affected person Security ActRead the Affected person Security and High quality Enchancment Act of 2005. Then, overview the data on the Core Measure Units from The Joint Fee. Decide one of many core measures from the record on the backside of this webpage and talk about how a hospital would sometimes put insurance policies and procedures into place with a view to make sure that it's following your chosen core measure. Make the most of at the least two scholarly sources, not together with the textbook, that comprise analysis concerning how your coverage and/or process can be put into place in a hospital setting. Your preliminary submit should be a minimal of 250 phrases.Required Response: Overview your classmates’ posts and choose three who selected totally different core measures than you. In a considerable submit to every, consider the feasibility of placing collectively their really helpful coverage and/or process for a well being care facility. Clarify whether or not or not you suppose there's a higher means to make sure that this core measure is adopted. You need to use at the least one further scholarly supply in your response. Your response posts should be a minimal of 100 phrases.Fastidiously overview the Grading Rubric for the factors that shall be used to judge your submit and responses. Reply This part lists choices that can be utilized to view responses. Develop All Print View Present Choices ResponsesResponses are listed under within the following order: response, writer and the date and time the response is posted. Type by Learn/Unread Type by Response Sorted Ascending, click on to type descending Type by Writer Type by Date/Time*Nobody has responded to this subject. To be the primary respondent, click on the Reply hyperlink under the subject.Ashford four: - Week three - Dialogue 2Your preliminary dialogue thread is due on Day three (Thursday) and you've got till Day 7 (Monday) to answer your classmates. Your grade will replicate each the standard of your preliminary submit and the depth of your responses.Scorching CoffeeWatch the sequence of movies associated to the documentary film Scorching Espresso and/or watch the full-length characteristic movie if you'll be able to procure it. Every of the video clips are roughly 5 minutes in size. Your preliminary submit should be a minimal of 250 phrases and make the most of at the least two scholarly sources, not together with the course textual content. Deal with the next as you reply:Clarify whether or not you imagine that our justice system promotes frivolous regulation fits or protects in opposition to them.Analyze the varied parts that individuals ought to take into accounts previous to submitting a lawsuit that is likely to be perceived as “frivolous.”Clarify the moral concerns surrounding such lawsuits within the well being care area.Required Response: Reply to at the least two classmates. Look at their rationalization of our justice system in relation to selling or defending in opposition to frivolous lawsuits. Talk about whether or not or not their rationalization can apply to medical malpractice. Your responses ought to comprise at the least 100 phrases.Fastidiously overview the Grading Rubric for the factors that shall be used to judge your submit and responses. Reply This part lists choices that can be utilized to view responses. Develop All Print View Present Choices ResponsesResponses are listed under within the following order: response, writer and the date and time the response is posted. Type by Learn/Unread Type by Response Sorted Ascending, click on to type descending Type by Writer Type by Date/Time*Nobody has responded to this subject. To be the primary respondent, click on the Reply hyperlink under the subject.Ashford four: - Week three - AssignmentAnnotated BibliographyUnder the Remaining Paper tab on this classroom, decide which case you'll be researching to your Remaining Paper. Present an outline of the case you'll be researching. Then, discover at the least six scholarly sources which can be linked with the moral dilemma and/or case-related content material that you'll be utilizing to finish your Remaining Paper. Present an annotated bibliography of those six (or extra) sources.APA formatted citationA description of the article:What does it tackle?What have been the outcomes or conclusions?How does this apply to your case examine evaluation?Does it present insights into an moral idea?Is it the same case to the one you might be analyzing?Does it supply ideas from finest practices in moral resolution making?Your paper must be at the least two pages in size, excluding title and reference pages, and formatted in line with APA fashion as outlined within the Ashford Writing Middle. Go to the Ashford Writing Middle and look at this Pattern Annotated Bibliography for an instance of right annotated bibliography type.Ashford 5: - Week four - Dialogue 1Your preliminary dialogue thread is due on Day three (Thursday) and you've got till Day 7 (Monday) to answer your classmates. Your grade will replicate each the standard of your preliminary submit and the depth of your responses.Moral Useful resource AllocationWork via the simulation titled Useful resource Allocation from the top of Chapter eight of your course textual content. Overview the varied choices within the simulation, then choose “Your Personal Option” to sort out your individual answer to the situation. You'll need to repeat and paste your response from “Your Personal Option” into the dialogue board discussion board because it is not going to be transferred in any other case. Here's a transient synopsis of the simulation concerning the hospital’s finances and dilemma:Hospital prices in tens of millions for one yr:One 35-year-old most cancers affected person who wants important time with the physician, medical provides, assessments, and across the clock care. Price: 100Emergency Room operations for day by day care and therapy of about 100 individuals (~365,000/yr). Price: 1002 Senior Sufferers who want hip substitute surgical procedure. Price: 5010 sufferers (ranging in age from 18 to 45) receiving help in your inpatient drug/alcohol rehab unit. Price:100An MRI unit that's on the fritz and will die any day. Alternative Price: 170Considered one of your two X-ray machines is inoperable and should be changed. Price 100Ambulance drive-in space was broken and must be repaired. Price: 25Coaching wants for nursing employees for certification necessities. Price: 55TOTAL: $700 millionFor this dialogue, tackle the next:You have got $700 million in bills and solely $500 million to work with. How do allocate your assets?Who will get handled and who has to attend?What about your amenities?Decide what you intend to do and clarify your reasoning in addition to the moral concerns behind your resolution.Your preliminary response should be at the least 250 phrases and should use at the least two scholarly sources.Required Response: Overview your classmates’ useful resource allocation plan and justification. Analyze the moral issues you might have that will negatively impression the hospital. Describe the potential backlash that will consequence from their plan. Reply to at the least two classmates. Your response should be at the least 100 phrases.Fastidiously overview the Grading Rubric for the factors that shall be used to judge your submit and responses. Reply This part lists choices that can be utilized to view responses. Develop All Print View Present Choices ResponsesResponses are listed under within the following order: response, writer and the date and time the response is posted. Type by Learn/Unread Type by Response Sorted Ascending, click on to type descending Type by Writer Type by Date/Time*Nobody has responded to this subject. To be the primary respondent, click on the Reply hyperlink under the subject.Ashford 5: - Week four - AssignmentStark LawTwo physicians, Dr. S. and Dr. V., leased a nuclear digital camera so they'd not need to refer their sufferers to the native hospital for nuclear imaging. Confronted with the prospect of dropping over a 3rd of its $2,274,094 in annual gross nuclear drugs revenues, the hospital responded by threatening to revoke the doctors’ admitting privileges. Prolonged negotiations ensued, on the finish of which the hospital agreed to sublease the digital camera from the 2 physicians; the digital camera remained on the physicians’ workplaces however different physicians with privileges on the hospital may use it. 4 different native physicians who supplied the identical or related providers to sufferers as Dr. S. and Dr. V. introduced a qui tam motion alleging that the sublease violated the Anti-Kickback and Stark Acts and that the defendants falsely licensed compliance with these legal guidelines in reference to claims submitted to Medicare in violation of the False Claims Act.(Please notice: That is an precise court docket case and an Web search could uncover the precise case particulars. You're prohibited from using any supply supplies related to this case. Use of any associated supplies will end in a discount of factors on this project. This project is being graded in your capability to critically think—by yourself recognizance—primarily based in your comprehension of the data supplied on this week’s studying supplies.)Directions: Fastidiously overview Chapter 7 of your textbook and analysis Stark Regulation. Given this situation, analyze whether or not the actions of Dr. S. and Dr. V. violated Stark Regulation. Present stable proof supporting your resolution by using info from the Ashford College Library in addition to the regulation itself.Your paper should be two to 3 pages in size, excluding the title and reference pages; embody at the least two scholarly sources, along with the textbook; and be written in APA format. Fastidiously overview the Grading Rubric for the factors that shall be used to judge your project.Ashford 6: - Week 5 - Dialogue 1Your preliminary dialogue thread is due on Day three (Thursday) and you've got till Day 7 (Monday) to answer your classmates. Your grade will replicate each the standard of your preliminary submit and the depth of your responses.Compliance PresentationImagine that you're a hospital’s compliance officer, and you might be charged with making a presentation to your hospital’s board of administrators concerning the ethical proper to healthcare. Your presentation ought to embody at the least three of the weather discovered all through this course, which may embody, however will not be restricted to: the Code of Ethics, useful resource allocation, Stark Regulation, medical malpractice, and cultural competency. For this dialogue, start by making a PowerPoint presentation that addresses the difficulty of the ethical proper to healthcare. Then, make the most of the PowerPoint and create a presentation utilizing a screencast program. Your presentation should embody at the least 5 slides (not together with a canopy slide and reference slide), make the most of at the least two scholarly sources, and be between three and 5 minutes lengthy. Please submit your references both in your final slide or throughout the dialogue submit. Please additionally submit your hyperlink to your screencast in addition to your precise PowerPoint presentation within the dialogue discussion board.Required Response I (Due by Day 5): Think about that you're one of many board members listening to your compliance officer’s presentation. Reply with a minimal of 150 phrases to at the least two colleagues’ circumstances in an acceptable matter by addressing the next:Give your general impression of the presentation. Was it clear and comprehensible?Look at at the least three key factors that have been made within the presentation. Did these parts make sense? May they be accepted by the hospital?Problem your colleague concerning his or her presentation by questioning a number of of the important thing factors within the presentation. Your query shouldn't be capable of be answered with a sure or no. Use phrases similar to, “How can we…” “What do you suppose the response can be to…” and related notations.Required Response II (Due by Day 7): Your classmates may have posted inquiries to your authentic submit. You're required to answer their query in a scholarly method. Use your analysis to assist your response to the feedback and query(s) they posed. Your response must be at the least 100 phrases.Chances are you'll use Screenr, Jing, Screencast-O-Matic, or another screencast program, nonetheless the usage of a screencast program is required.Utilizing Screenr.comReview the Screenr Fast-Begin Information and go to the Screenr.com web site to get began. Chances are you'll view the Screenr demonstration video or contact Screenr Assist instantly for help utilizing the software program program. In the event you discover utilizing Screenr to be tough, you could elect to make use of a distinct screencast program. Jing and Screencast-O-Matic are different good screencast assets which can be free. You may additionally search by yourself to find a program of your alternative. Using a screencast program is required. Fastidiously overview the Grading Rubric for the factors that shall be used to judge your submit and responses. Reply This part lists choices that can be utilized to view responses. Develop All Print View Present Choices ResponsesResponses are listed under within the following order: response, writer and the date and time the response is posted. Type by Learn/Unread Type by Response Sorted Ascending, click on to type descending Type by Writer Type by Date/Time*Nobody has responded to this subject. To be the primary respondent, click on the Reply hyperlink under the subject.Ashford 6: - Week 5 - Remaining PaperFinal PaperReview the three eventualities under. Select certainly one of them and tackle the questions requested inside your chosen situation within the type of a written evaluation.Situation No. 1: HIPAA Privateness RuleCase Research: Think about that you're the privateness officer for a small city hospital. You obtain a report that there's a breach of privateness. You're knowledgeable 15-year-old lady is obtained on the emergency with an emergency labor. The child is delivered within the emergency room as there is no such thing as a time to maneuver the affected person to the obstetrics (OB) division. Along with the emergency supply, the infant is born with a number of medical issues. As soon as the mom and child are moved to obstetrics and neonate, care is given to each.The OB nurse who took care of the mom and child completes her shift, and he or she goes dwelling to her personal daughter to have a chat together with her. She sits her daughter down and pleads with the lady to inform her if she ever has any issues, particularly in relation to being pregnant. The nurse tells her daughter the story in regards to the younger affected person who delivered that night, and he or she by chance mentions the patient’s title. The patient’s title is a kind of odd names that instantly triggers the nurse’s daughter to relay that she is aware of the affected person. The mom/nurse, realizing that she made an enormous mistake by mentioning the patient’s title, pleads together with her daughter to not say something. For sure, phrase shoots via the 4 excessive colleges within the city the following day.The nurse returns to work the next night, and he or she contacts you handy in her badge and keys, stating that she is aware of she made a mistake by breaching the younger patient’s privateness and he or she is aware of she goes to be fired. Along with the breach of the obstetrics nurse, you study that the affected person hid her being pregnant from her household, and to make issues worse, her aunt and mom are each nurses on the hospital. You already know each of those nurses on knowledgeable and private degree.Situation No. 1 HIPAA Privateness Rule Mission Project:Analysis the HIPAA Privateness Rule right here:U.S. Division of Well being and Human Providers. (2002). Requirements for privateness of individually identifiable well being info; Remaining Rule. Federal Register, 67(157), 53182-53273. Retrieved from https://www.studyproessay.com/write-my-paper/hhs.gov/ocr/privateness/hipaa/administrative/privacyrule/privrulepd.pdf.Then, carry out further analysis concerning the HIPAA Privateness Rule and put together your Remaining Paper by analyzing the problems via these questions regarding the above situation:Analyze the precise necessities wanted to carry out this investigation.Establish whether or not this incident was an precise breach of privateness in line with the HIPAA regulation.Look at the variations and similarities between the hospital’s stance and HIPAA as as to whether the nurse must be fired from her job.Clarify why you'll fireplace or not fireplace the nurse instantly or whether or not you'll put her on administrative depart awaiting the small print of the investigation.Situation No. 2: DNRProject Project: Overview your State Government’s web site and seek for its official Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) Kind. Together with the shape shall be info and directions concerning the shape. As well as, analysis three space hospitals to find out if they supply separate DNR types. Then, carry out further analysis concerning DNR and put together your Remaining Paper by analyzing the problems via these steps:Analyze the necessities of your State Government’s DNR.Establish the necessities of the three hospital’s DNRs.Look at the variations and similarities between the state’s and the three hospital’s DNR necessities, and tackle the next questions:What are they?Which one must you comply with?Clarify how a DNR is utilized if a affected person is beneath hospice care and EMTs are known as.Situation No. three: Institutional Code of EthicsProject Project: Codes of ethics are requirements that define how people or teams of persons are to behave. The healthcare/medical neighborhood has its personal code of ethics, which is printed within the American Medical Association’s Code of Medical Ethics. Overview the next:AMA’s Code of Medical Ethics right here:American Medical Affiliation. (2013). AMA’s code of medical ethics. Retrieved from https://www.studyproessay.com/write-my-paper/ama-assn.org/ama/pub/physician-resources/medical-ethics/code-medical-ethics.web page.Three native or regional hospitals’ codes of ethics.Numerous scholarly analysis on healthcare codes of ethics (at the least seven further sources).Then, put together your Remaining Paper by analyzing the problems via these steps:Analyze the precise necessities of a code of ethics.Establish three important parts of the AMA’s code that you just imagine are most vital.Look at the variations and similarities between the AMA’s Code of Medical Ethics necessities and the code necessities of the three hospitals that you just researched.Clarify why sure people and/or teams (please title these) ought to comply with a hospital’s code of ethics. Writing the Remaining PaperThe Remaining Paper:Have to be eight to 10 double-spaced pages in size, excluding title and reference pages, and formatted in line with APA fashion as outlined within the Ashford Writing Middle.Should embody a title web page with the next:Title of paperStudent’s nameCourse title and numberInstructor’s nameDate submittedMust start with an introductory paragraph that has a succinct thesis assertion.Should tackle the subject of the paper with important thought.Should finish with a conclusion that reaffirms your thesis.Should use at the least eight scholarly sources (not together with the course textual content) that have been revealed throughout the final 5 years, together with a minimal of 4 sources from tutorial journals discovered within the Ashford College Library.Should doc all sources in APA fashion, as outlined within the Ashford Writing Middle.Should embody a separate reference web page, formatted in line with APA fashion as outlined within the Ashford Writing Middle.Fastidiously overview the Grading Rubric for the factors that shall be used to judge your project.Project Submission In Ashford programs, there are two alternative ways to submit assignments for grading. Relying on the system the course makes use of, assignments will both be submitted through the classroom Project Basket Project Basket Icon or Waypoint Waypoint Icon.Waypoint Waypoint Project Submission The assignments on this course shall be submitted to Waypoint. Please discuss with the directions under to submit your project.Click on on the Project Submission button above. The Waypoint "Scholar Dashboard" will seem.Browse to your project.Click on Add.Affirm that your project was efficiently submitted by viewing the suitable week's project tab in Waypoint, or clicking on Verify Project Standing throughout the Meet Your Teacher unit within the left navigation panel.For extra detailed directions, discuss with the Waypoint Tutorial.