Posted: September 11th, 2020
Reflect on drugs used to treat asthmatic patients
To Prepare
Reflect on drugs used to treat asthmatic patients, including long-term control and quick-relief treatment options for patients. Think about the impact these drugs might have on patients, including adults and children.
Consider how you might apply the stepwise approach to address the health needs of a patient in your practice.
Reflect on how stepwise management assists health care providers and patients in gaining and maintaining control of the disease.
Assignment
IT must have an introduction, and conclusion and reference
Create a 5- to 6-slide PowerPoint presentation that can be used in a staff development meeting on presenting different approaches for implementing the stepwise approach for asthma treatment. Be sure to address the following:
-Write a page paper – Describe long-term control and quick relief treatment options for the asthma patient from your practice as well as the impact these drugs might have on your patient.
-Explain the stepwise approach to asthma treatment and management for your patient.
-Explain how stepwise management assists health care providers and patients in gaining and maintaining control of the disease. Be specific.
—
– free essay sample
Environmental justice
Student’s Name
Institution
It is a concept used to describe a situation where environmental profits and burdens are shared equally among various races and social classes.
In the US, the term also refers to a movement that pushes for equitable distribution of environmental responsibilities to all groups regardless of their social and racial status.
–
It was developed due to lack of meaningful involvement of racial minorities and low income earners in development and enforcement of laws & polices concerning environmental conservation.
Laws and policies were usually skewed; the minority groups enjoy less environmental benefits and carry more environmental burdens (United States, 2006).
Research done by The Yale University concluded that the poor, racial minorities and uneducated communities were more exposed to environmental pollutants than high income earners and white people (In Konisky, 2015).
For instance, neighborhoods such as Pittsburg, Fresno and Cincinnati in Los Angeles host the above communities and were found to have elevated levels or particulate and gaseous pollutants in the air (In Konisky, 2015).
–
Many other counties by far exceeded the safe amount of particulate pollutants according to the recent EPA standards (In Konisky, 2015).
The federal health standard is very wide and leaves a room for large variations.
Latino communities were found to be in the most polluted neighborhoods/ whites were found to be in the safest.
Land fills
Dump sites
Factories producing high levels of water and/or air pollutants
Busy highways
Truck depots
–
Dust, Vanadium,Nitrates ,Sulfur oxides, Zinc
PM2.5 (soot), this is a micro particle that is produced in factories that combust petroleum or coal
Some polluted neighborhoods had upto 39% more soot and/or oxides of mitogen compared to rich and/or white communities.
This variation is higher in developed cities.
The elevated levels of air pollution causes 7000 deaths annually through causing or aggravating heart diseases (In Konisky, 2015).
–
Poor neighborhoods have cheap land
Such people are underrepresented in the governments
Some communities offer cheap source of labor
Illiteracy makes such groups unable to agitate for their right to a clean and safe environment.
Environmental justice asserts that there should be fairness in that such communities should not be made to suffer the consequences of environmental pollution alone.
Additionally, some of these facilities can be relocated: the communities can also be taught of means to protect themselves from negative impacts of environmental pollution in such projects.
–
Ensuring that the cost of setting up factories and other facilities is rather uniform across the US
Empowering poor communities and ethnic minorities
Ensuring that production processes are safe/ efficient such that air and water pollution is kept at minimum
Subsidized residences for vulnerable groups do not have to be in cheap and pollution prone areas
The cost of setting up factories in or around rich neighborhoods and some cities is high. This makes such firms to be moved to poor communities where permits and clearance licenses for such activities are cheaper
—
Due to illiteracy, poor people and minorities do not understand the effects of some facilities and activities around them. Such people need to be educated on the following
Negative impacts of such facilities including the pollutants produced
How they can demand for their rights through activism and the media
how to mitigate the effects of some pollutants for instance through the use of protective equipment
They can also demand for treatment and compensation when there is recklessness by managers of such companies.
Farms and the government should participate to ensure that the facilities such as landfills, track depots, dirty industries have least injurious effects on poor communities. For instance,
Firms can use catalytic converters to convert exhaust fumes into less harmful by-products.
Firms can also plant many trees as they absorb some toxic organic gasses. They also trap dust and soot.
Facilities such as landfills should be compacted and be well labeled to avoid injuries.
The government should avoid offering houses built in polluted environment or unsafe areas to vulnerable groups as this exposes them to more danger and further pollution.
Truck depots can be a sunken one, be built in natural valleys or be surrounded by earth mounds to reduce noise pollution reaching the communities (Bullard & UN Research Institute for Social Development, 2004). .
—
Classical racists believed that some races were more superior or had superior cultures.
Today racism include mindsets or belief systems that promote perceived superiority or inferiority of races.
This has promoted to environmental injustices
Some activities are such as routine pollution is sometimes done for racial than economic reasons.
The government, activists and poor communities can work to stop it (Checker, 2005).
—
Setting up factories and environment polluting facilities in or around poor neighborhoods is cheaper in the following ways
Land is cheaper
Fewer permits and clearances
Less scrutiny by the media and the communities
Tax payers feel that their money is wisely spent when sewage or waste treatment sites are located in these areas
If the costs of permits and clearances are made uniform, distribution of such facilities can be more even.
Areas with less population should be used for such activities (Cole, W & Foster, 2001)
When conducting a cost-benefit assessment for a potential site, the safety of the communities should be evaluated
Efforts should be made to ensure that no toxic affluent reach communities if these facilities are established in these neighborhoods (Cole, W & Foster, 2001)
Some times, poor communities have gone to live in cheap areas previously marked for activities that pollute environment.
This should be discouraged through economic and educational empowerment.
The US department of Housing and urban envelopment should avoid selecting polluted neighborhoods for subsidized housing for the poor as this exposes them to more danger.
—–
References
United States. (2006). United States Environmental Protection Agency charter: National Environmental Justice Advisory Council. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency.
In Konisky, D. M. (2015). Failed promises: Evaluating the federal government’s response to environmental justice.
Bullard, R. D., & UN Research Institute for Social Development. (2004). Environment and morality: Confronting environmental racism in the United States. Geneva: UN Research Institute for Social Development
Checker, M. (2005). Polluted promises: Environmental racism and the search for justice in a southern town. New York: New York University Press.
Cole, L. W., & Foster, S. R. (2001). From the ground up: Environmental racism and the rise of the environmental justice movement. New York: New York University Press.