ME504 Unit Title Advanced Networking Assessment
Evaluation Particulars and Submission Pointers Trimester T3 2017 Unit Code ME504 Unit Title Superior Networking Evaluation Sort Particular person Evaluation Title Task 1 – Excessive-Degree Community Design (Plan and design LAN and WAN networks) Function of the evaluation (with ULO Mapping) The aim of this project is to develop necessities and design a community which will be carried out for an SME (small and medium sized enterprise). The design of community and repair should be particular in order that it may be used for the aim of a citation and proposal from distributors. In making ready the project, college students ought to purchase not solely the data of present technical features of IP networks but additionally analysis, knowledge assortment, evaluation and writing abilities. Weight 10% Complete Marks 30 Phrase restrict 2000 - 2500 phrases Due Date four January (11:55PM Thursday in Week 7) T3-2017. Submission Pointers • All work should be submitted on Moodle by the due date together with a accomplished Task Cowl Web page. • The project should be in MS Phrase format, 1.5 spacing, 11-pt Calibri (Physique) font and a pair of cm margins on all 4 sides of every web page with acceptable part headings. Reference sources should be cited within the textual content of the report, and listed appropriately on the finish in a reference listing utilizing IEEE referencing model. • MS WORD file kind is used for submission in Moodle. No ‘zipped’ recordsdata or different sorts should be used. Extension • If an extension of time to submit work is required, a Particular Consideration Software should be submitted on to the College's Administration Officer, in Melbourne on Degree 6 or in Sydney on Degree 7. You could submit this utility three working days previous to the due date of the project. Additional info is on the market at: https://www.studyproessay.com/write-my-paper/mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/specialconsiderationdeferment Educational Misconduct • Educational Misconduct is a severe offence. Relying on the seriousness of the case, penalties can range from a written warning or zero marks to exclusion from the course or rescinding of the diploma. College students ought to make themselves conversant in the complete coverage and process accessible at: https://www.studyproessay.com/write-my-paper/mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/Plagiarism-Educational-Misconduct-Coverage-Process. For additional info, please confer with the Educational Integrity Part in your Unit Description. Task Description Duties: There are two components to this project, half A and half B. A. Examine, design and develop an acceptable LAN and WAN community for an SME by addressing the next standards. See detailed directions within the subsequent part. 25 marks B. Presentation 5 marks Half An outline: There are areas to contemplate for VPN community design on this project. • Design a community for an SME embody LAN and WAN Contents should embody: • Introduction • Scopes and Limitations • Necessities (Community components and VPN service components) • Answer Design a. Logical Design b. Bodily Design c. Community Topologies d. IP addressing e. Safety features and Insurance policies f. Redundancy and Failover plans g. VPN service implementation • Evaluation and Analysis • Seek advice from the pattern doc under for community design, and take into account how one can implement VPN companies onto the community. Marking standards: Marks are allotted as indicated on every query, taking the next features under consideration: Points Description Identification and evaluation and outline Accurately identification, appropriateness, dialogue Clarification/justification Description and justification Presentation and diagrams Construction, presentation, formatting, writing Reference model Right referencing model is required, if relevant Plagiarism Copying from one other pupil, copying from web sources/textbook, copying from different sources with out correct acknowledgement. Marking information: Job A - Complete 25 marks No Classes Description Marks 1 Template and format The doc ought to embody all needed headings and content material to depict a Degree 2 (e.g. Ethernet, VPWS, VPLS) and Degree three (e.g. VPRN) companies and community design as per the instance offered. 5 2 Necessities A number of figures and tables needs to be included to point out the necessities growth. There should be a bit for a ‘compliance’ examine in order that distributors can correctly reply to the necessities. 5 three Options This part ought to embody acceptable headings and content material to suggest an answer for an SME community. Wi-fi LAN resolution needs to be included. 10 four Evaluation and Analysis Embrace a bit for comparability of the benefits and downsides of the proposed resolution, which is able to justify the explanation for its alternative. Important evaluation and analysis needs to be addressed with minimal 1000 phrases 5 Complete 25 Half B description: Job B - Complete 5 marks The proposed community design can be offered in a 5-minute presentation throughout the week 7 Laboratory class. Presentation slides needs to be submitted in Moodle previous to the presentation for marking. No different choices (exhausting copy, reminiscence stick, web site and e-mail) can be thought of however the presentation file submitted in Moodle. Marks can be given as under: • Presentation (three marks) • Slides (2 marks) Marking Rubric for Task 1 Questions-Marks as proven Grade Mark HD 80%+ D 70%-79% CR 60%-69% P 50%-59% Fail 50% Glorious Very Good Good Passable Unsatisfactory Identification and Evaluation and outline Extremely legitimate and acceptable Legitimate and acceptable Typically legitimate and acceptable Legitimate however no acceptable Not legitimate and never acceptable Clarification/ justification All components are current and effectively built-in. Elements current with good cohesion Elements current and largely effectively built-in Most elements current Lacks construction. Reference model Clear types with glorious supply of references. Clear referencing/ model Typically good referencing/model Unclear referencing/model Lacks consistency with many errors Presentation and diagrams Correct writing and drawing. Professionally offered Correctly written and drawing, with some minor deficiencies Largely good, however some construction or presentation issues Acceptable presentation Poor construction, careless presentation