HI6027 Unit Title Business and Corporate Law Case Studies
HOLMES INSTITUTE FACULTY OF HIGHER EDUCATION HI6027 Enterprise and Company Legislation Group Project T1 2019 Evaluation Particulars and Submission Pointers Trimester T1 2019 Unit Code HI6027 Unit Title Enterprise and Company Legislation Evaluation Kind Group Project Evaluation Title Case Research of Enterprise Legislation and Firms Legislation Goal of the evaluation (with ULO Mapping) The aim of the Group Project is to offer college students with a possibility to work in a collaborative surroundings in fixing two case issues by citing the related authorized guidelines and circumstances and making use of these to the information of the case. On this Group Assignments, college students are required to: - Assess the obligations, rights and cures out there to events specifically business relationships. (ULO three) - Critically look at the foundations of Australian firm legislation. (ULO four) - Critically talk about and apply contract and tort legislation in enterprise circumstances. (ULO 5) - Critically talk about and apply the authorized framework that regulates an organization’s dealings with outsiders. (ULO 7) Weight 20 % of the full assessments Whole Marks 20 Phrase restrict Group Written Report of most 2,000 phrases and a 10 minute presentation Due Date Week 10 Submission Pointers  All work should be submitted on Blackboard by the due date together with a accomplished Project Cowl Web page.  The task should be in MS Phrase format, no spacing, 12-pt Arial font and a pair of cm margins on all 4 sides of your web page with applicable part headings and web page numbers.  Reference sources should be cited within the textual content of the report, and listed appropriately on the finish in a reference record utilizing Harvard referencing model. Web page 2 of seven HI6027 Enterprise and Company Legislation Group Project T1 2019 Project Specs Goal: The Group Project goals to offer college students with a possibility to work in a collaborative surroundings in fixing two case issues by citing the related authorized guidelines and circumstances and making use of these to the information of the case. College students are to kind teams, with a minimal of three and a most of 5 college students per group. The task consists of two components: a 2,000 phrases written report and an Eight-10 minutes (most) in-class or video presentation. Directions: Please learn and re-read fastidiously to keep away from errors. Group Report 1. This group task consists of two components. Half A is a case examine on contract legislation, and Half B is a query involving Firms Legislation. Each questions should be answered. 2. The overall phrase restrict for the group report is 2,000 phrases (+/- 10% allowed) with every half having a most phrase depend of 1,000 phrases. Phrase depend limits are strictly enforced. A deduction of two marks will likely be imposed for each 50 phrases over the phrase depend for both a part of the report. Something over the phrase depend is not going to be learn by your lecturer. three. The overall phrase depend for the report in addition to every half should be clearly written on the quilt sheet of the task. A paper is not going to be marked if the phrase counts should not written on the quilt sheet. four. The group report is price 10% of complete marks for this task. 5. Every group should submit a draft of their report on Blackboard in accordance with the due dates under. If a draft shouldn't be submitted, the ultimate report is not going to be marked.  by week Eight if class is within the regular mode  by week four if class is in block mode 1  by week 9 is class is in block mode 2 Half A: Contract Legislation Query i. Consult with the prescribed textbook: Fitzpatrick J, Symes C, Veljanovski A & Parker D, Enterprise and Firms Legislation three rd ed. (2017), LexisNexis Butterworths Australia. ii. From Half 1 - Enterprise, Chapters 2 to six on Contract Legislation, consult with the Downside Questions on the finish of the chapter and select one (1) query. Observe: it should be a case problemtype query and never a brief reply query. iii. You need to ship your lecturer the variety of your query and the web page on which it seems for approval. Don't begin work on a query with out acquiring your lecturer’s prior approval. iv. In no more than 1,000 phrases, reply your chosen authorized case query utilizing the IRAC technique. v. Your reply should be supported by related legislation and circumstances determined by Australian courts (ideally the Excessive Court docket) and/or scholarly articles. A minimal of three references are required for this a part of the report. vi. Your references should be listed in a Reference record on the finish of the Half A query. Web page three of seven HI6027 Enterprise and Company Legislation Group Project T1 2019 Half B: Firms Legislation Questions i. Once more, consult with Enterprise and Firms Legislation three rd version by Fitzpatrick et al. ii. This time, consult with Half 2 - Firms, Chapters 7 to 10 on Firms. Consult with the Downside Questions on the finish of the chapter and select one (1) query. Observe: it should be a case problem-type query and never a brief reply query. iii. You need to ship your lecturer the variety of your query and the web page on which it seems for approval. Don't begin work on a query with out acquiring your lecturer’s prior approval. iv. In no more than 1,000 phrases, reply your chosen authorized case query utilizing the IRAC technique. v. Your reply should be supported by related legislation and circumstances determined by Australian courts (ideally the Excessive Court docket) and/or scholarly articles. A minimal of three references are required for this a part of the report. vi. Your references should be listed in a Reference record on the finish of the Half B query. Group Presentation 1. Summarise your solutions for Components A and B of the group report. 2. Current and talk about the abstract of your solutions in 10 minutes (5 minutes for every half). three. The Presentation will likely be achieved in school or video recording. Your lecturer will advise which is extra applicable.  Whether or not in-class or video presentation, all members should current. The group will likely be marked down if not all members current. four. Video hyperlink should be uploaded to a publicly-viewable video sharing platform (ex. Youtube, Dropbox, Google drive) and the video hyperlink uploaded on Blackboard. 5. A video presentation consists of each photos and audio. For that reason, a plain Energy Level presentation exhibiting slides even with accompanying voice recording shouldn't be thought-about a video and, therefore, not allowed. 6. The group presentation is price 10% of complete marks for this task. Essential Reminders:  You need to e mail your lecturer your record of group members and chosen questions by week four.  You need to receive approval by e mail out of your lecturer of your group and chosen questions earlier than beginning work on it. Please be aware: failure to acquire lecturer approval will end in a failing mark for all the group for the group task.  All group report submissions should be de achieved on-line and run by way of SafeAssign. No onerous copies are to be submitted. Just one group member must submit for the entire group.  Please fill within the “Rubric Group Report” sheet (out there in Blackboard beneath “Assignments and Due dates) and fix as a canopy sheet to your group report and add on Blackboard.  Every workforce member additionally should additionally undergo their lecturer a “Peer Analysis of Particular person Participation in Group Project” sheet (out there in Blackboard beneath “Assignments and Due dates) with their presentation/video. Web page four of seven HI6027 Enterprise and Company Legislation Group Project T1 2019  No submission of both the group report or video presentation hyperlink on Blackboard/SafeAssign (if doing a video presentation) is equal to non-submission, which is able to advantage a mark of zero (zero) for the group task.  GROUPS OF LESS THAN three AND MORE THAN 5 PEOPLE WILL RECEIVE A PENALTY OF 10 marks (50%).  Group report should be submitted through SafeAssign on Blackboard and present a similarity proportion determine. Any group report that doesn't present a SafeAssign similarity proportion is not going to be marked and be required to re-submit.  Late submissions will likely be topic to Holmes Institute coverage on pupil evaluation submission and late penalties (please consult with topic define and Scholar handbook).  All studies are anticipated to watch correct referencing in accordance with the Australian Information to Authorized Quotation (AGLC). A duplicate of the AGLC could also be learn on-line at no cost through this hyperlink: https://legislation.unimelb.edu.au/__data/belongings/pdf_file/0005/2877782/AGLC3.pdf  Generally, for written studies, a SafeAssign similarity proportion of 25% or under is acceptable. Whatever the similarity determine, all group studies should use in-text quotation and observe correct referencing guidelines. Marking standards Marking standards Weighting (%) Group Report - Identification of fabric information concerned in downside query 2% - Identification of authorized points / authorized query and related legislation 2% - Thorough but succinct software of legislation to materials information three% - Quotation and referencing 1.5% - Presentation 1.5% Presentation - Group member participation and division of components 1.5% - Depth of study and proof of understanding of the problems offered and crucial considering in solutions four% - Degree of professionalism in presentation three% - General readability of presentation 1.5% TOTAL Weight 20% Web page 5 of seven HI6027 Enterprise and Company Legislation Group Project T1 2019 Marking Rubric Group Report Whole marks out there: 10 marks Glorious Good Passable Unsatisfactory Identification of materials information concerned in downside query 2 marks 2 marks Fully identifies all related information of case 1.5 mark Identifies most of the related information of case 1 mark Identifies the fundamental related information of the case however misses different related information Under 1 mark Doesn't establish related information of case Identification of authorized points / authorized query and related legislation 2 marks 2 marks Appropriately identifies all related authorized points and are said within the kind of questions. Appropriately identifies related and applicable authorized guidelines and case legislation, and states them in the type of statements 1.5 mark Points appropriately recognized, however could include extraneous info and should not said in the type of questions. Authorized guidelines and case legislation appropriately recognized, however could include extraneous information and should not within the type of statements. 1 mark Subject should not utterly recognized. Authorized guidelines and case legislation not appropriately recognized. Under 1 mark Identifies incorrect or irrelevant points. Identifies incorrect or irrelevant authorized guidelines and case legislation. Thorough but succinct software of legislation to materials information three marks three marks Appropriately identifies information; wellreasoned dialogue relating information to the principles and case legislation. 2.5 to 2 marks Appropriately identifies information. Not nicely reasoned. 1.5 mark Information not appropriately recognized. Evaluation incoherent. Under 1.5 mark No evaluation. Quotation and referencing (together with minimal variety of references) 1.5 marks 1.5 marks Appropriately cites minimal of 6 references, in-text and in reference record. 1 mark Has minimal of 6 references; or has occasional errors in formatting of in-text citations and reference record zero.75 mark Doesn't have minimal of 6 references or accommodates errors in formatting of intext citations and reference record Under zero.75 mark No referencing both in-text or in reference record; or cites inappropriate references; or all references not cited in the proper format. Web page 6 of seven HI6027 Enterprise and Company Legislation Group Project T1 2019 Presentation 1.5 marks 1.5 marks Skilled language. No grammatical, punctuation or spelling errors. 1 mark Some errors. Doesn't detract from understanding. zero.75 mark Many errors. Detracts from understanding. Sloppy. Under zero.75 mark Displays no actual effort. Deductions Extra phrase depend (1 mark for each 25 phrases over) Beneath the phrase restrict (1 mark for each 25 phrase beneath) Lacks minimal of 6 references (1 mark for each lacking reference) Group Presentation Whole marks out there: 10 Glorious Very Good Good Unsatisfactory Group member participation and division of components 1.5 marks 1.5 marks All group members offered and presentation is equally divided amongst group members; presentation reveals a wonderful degree of effort 1 mark All group members offered however presentation is not equally divided amongst group members; presentation reveals a excessive degree of effort zero.75 mark Not all group members offered or presentation is not equally divided amongst group members; however presentation reveals common effort. Under zero.75 mark Not all group members offered and presentation doesn't present actual effort. Depth of study and proof of understanding of the problems offered and crucial considering in solutions four marks four marks Shows in-depth evaluation and proof of sturdy understanding of the problems offered and crucial considering in solutions. three.5 to three.zero marks Shows sturdy evaluation and understanding of the problems offered and crucial considering in solutions. 2.5 to 2.zero marks Reveals acceptable degree of study and understanding of the problems. Under 2 marks Doesn't present acceptable degree of evaluation and understanding of the points; merely reads from ready solutions. Web page 7 of seven HI6027 Enterprise and Company Legislation Group Project T1 2019 Degree of professionalism in presentation (together with members in applicable enterprise apparel; and use of visible aids) three marks three marks Excessive-level of professionalism in presentation 2 marks Above common degree of professionalism in presentation 1.5 marks Common degree of professionalism in presentation Under 1.5 marks Under common degree of professionalism in presentation General readability of presentation 1.5 marks 1.5 marks Extraordinarily clear, succinct presentation 1 mark Excessive degree of readability and succinctness of presentation zero.75 mark Common degree of readability and succinctness of presentation Under zero.75 mark Under common degree of readability and succinctness of presentation