Gathering, analyzing, and summarizing research literature iv

 

Gathering, Analyzing, and Summarizing Analysis Literature IV

Introduction

This week you'll collect the final 4 articles pertinent to your analysis downside and talk about attributes surrounding the issue and your investigation of the issue.  You'll once more current the research as a synthesized overview within the dialogue board.  Your accomplished synthesized Literature Evaluate task is due in Workshop Six day seven.

Upon profitable completion of this task you must be capable to:

  • Summarize analysis literature pertinent to a nursing downside.

Sources

Background Info

Analysis questions usually change through the seek for present analysis articles associated to the issue.  In line with Ling Pan (2016), a search which nets numerous articles could warrant a narrowing of the query; and a search which nets solely a handful of articles could name for a broader query.  There could also be different influences as properly, i.e., when a beforehand completely researched subject is now outdated.  Some issues could also be acknowledged within the literature, but there aren't any present research addressing the issue or subproblems.  Don't hesitate to contact the OCLS reference librarian, Jule Sort as wanted.   Make certain and use the databases within the OCLS and request assist so that you simply get the literature you want.  Additionally, it's not unusual to revise the research query as wanted to higher goal the issue.

Directions

  1. Learn chapters 2 and four in Analysis Design, chapters three and 13 in Sensible Analysis: Planning and Design, and chapters three, four, and 5 in Making ready Literature Evaluations: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Evaluate all supplies listed.
  2. Navigate to the threaded dialogue and submit your quantitative analysis query.
  3. This dialogue has three elements:
    1. Gathering Analysis Literature IV
      1. Within the OCLS, discover 4 analysis research which pertain to your subject/downside/ analysis query.  (Your search outcomes ought to present further articles.  Save this search as you can be reviewing a complete of 16 articles over the course of this class.)  Make sure that your articles are throughout the previous four or 5 years.  Should you can't discover greater than 25 present articles associated to your downside / query on this primary search, let your teacher know instantly. 
      2. Full the knowledge requested on the spreadsheet entitled, Spreadsheet of Articles Reviewed for 4 articles and fix it to this dialogue.  The finished spreadsheet with 16 articles can be due along with your ultimate synthesized Literature Evaluate due in Workshop Six day seven.
    2. Analyzing Analysis Literature IV - Full the knowledge requested on the spreadsheet entitled, Spreadsheet of Analysis Research Evaluation for every of the 4 research for this week and fix to this dialogue.
    3. Summarizing Analysis Literature IV
      1. Use the template entitled, Synthesized Abstract-Draft 2.12.2018, to match and distinction this week’s research/articles on the factors of analysis query, variables, research design, use of a concept, pattern inhabitants, statistics, findings, and different key factors as pertinent to your research. The synthesis ought to use scholarly and scientific writing with use of APA type. Copy and paste your synthesized abstract into the dialogue board.  Please don't connect.
      2. Your full synthesized Literature Evaluate of a minimal of 16 articles can be due in Workshop Six day seven.

Navigate to the threaded discussion here.

Evaluation Standards

Standards

15 Factors

12 Factors

9 Factors

6 Factors

High quality

Your postings are properly developed and solutions present clear proof of crucial pondering.

Your questions or observations add higher depth to the dialogue by introducing new concepts.

Your postings present some growth and a few crucial pondering is clear in your solutions.

Your questions and observations add to the dialogue by increasing the concepts of others.

Your postings present nominal growth and solely the beginnings of crucial pondering.

Your contributions (questions or observations) don't clearly add to the dialogue.

Your postings present no growth and are largely a reiteration of what the textbook or others have stated.

Your questions and observations detract from the dialogue.

Standards

6 factors

5 Factors

three Factors

zero Factors

Timeliness

Your preliminary posting to the query or subject assigned within the workshop exercise is made by day 5 of the workshop.

Your preliminary posting to the query or subject assigned within the workshop exercise is made by the day six of the workshop.

Your preliminary posting to the query or subject assigned within the workshop exercise is made by day seven of the workshop.

No preliminary submit was made.

Standards

9 Factors

6 Factors

three Factors

zero Factors

Interplay

You reply to a minimal of two different classmates in addition to all follow-up school questions directed to you. 

You might be clearly collaborative by taking the initiative to reply to classmates' questions, offering clarification and perception on points within the dialogue. 

You reply to 2 classmates and a few of the school follow-up questions directed to you. 

You might be collaborative in some conditions and present some initiative in workshop discussions.

You reply to 2 classmates however don't reply to college follow-up questions directed to you. 

You present little initiative in discussions and your presence will not be collaborative.

You don't reply to the postings of others within the dialogue. 

Standards

25 Factors

19 Factors

14 Factors

9 Factors

Spreadsheet of Articles Reviewed

Info for all 4 research is full. Correct. Present. Properly focused. Peer reviewed.

Few lacking gadgets or data not totally reflective of the article. Present. Intently focused. Peer reviewed.

Lacking gadgets. Or lower than 4 articles.  Info not totally reflective of the article. Outdated. Marginally focused. Peer reviewed.

Info incomplete or lower than 4 articles.  Info not totally reflective of the article. Outdated. Doesn't tackle subject.

Standards

25 Factors

19 Factors

14 Factors

9 Factors

Spreadsheet of Analysis Research Evaluation

Info for all 4 research is full. Correct. Present. Properly focused. Peer reviewed.

Few lacking gadgets or data not totally reflective of the article. Present. Intently focused. Peer reviewed.

Lacking gadgets. Or lower than 4 articles.  Info not totally reflective of the article. Outdated. Marginally focused. Peer reviewed.

Info incomplete or lower than 4 articles.  Info not totally reflective of the article. Outdated. Doesn't tackle subject.

Complete Factors

eight