Film Analysis Of A Beautiful Mind English Literature Essay

A Lovely Thoughts is in regards to the lifetime of John Nash, the mathematical genius, a legend by the age of thirty when he slipped into schizophrenia, and who – due to the selfless devotion of his spouse and the persevering with patronage of arithmetic community- emerged after a loopy life to win a Nobel Prize in 1994 and world acclaim. The film, is predicated on the guide which is in a biographical fashion which has gained the reward of lots of, is already a winner of a number of prestigious awards amongst which that stand out are Nationwide Books Essential Circle for Biography and Pulitzer Prize in Biography.  Now, the guide is a significant Movement Image that has already bagged the Oscar for this yr.

The film is in regards to the life story of John Forbes Nash, Jr. – a mathematical genius and inventor of a idea of rational habits for which he was awarded a Nobel Prize in 1994. The guide is written in a biographical fashion in 5 elements, starting with a Prologue. The half one is on A Lovely Thoughts, Half two on Separate Lives, Half three on A Gradual Hearth Burning, Half 4 on The Misplaced Years, and the Half 5 on The Most Worthy, adopted by Epilogue, Notes, Choose Bibliography, Acknowledgements, and Index, The latter options not solely present an acceptable help to then aeration but additionally makes it a referenced biographical sketch. As Sylvia Nasser, the good writer of the guide concludes the Prologue; she ends by saying that “That is the story of John Forbes Nash, Jr. It's a story in regards to the thriller of the human thoughts, in three acts, genius, insanity, reawakening.” The writer excels not solely in narration fashion but additionally in her functionality in making the fashion absorbing – engrossing the reader fully within the richness of the story’s presentation. The Prologue begins the unfolding of the story by presenting wealthy details about John Forbes Nash, Jr., as different celebrities knew him – the a number of sides of his persona, particularly those who have been main him into his insanity. Presenting a characterization of schizophrenia, writer helps in informing the reader in regards to the circumstances below which a spontaneous restoration from this dementing and degenerative illness believed to be so uncommon, turned a chance for John Nash. In Epilogue, the writer narrates such occasions in John Nash’s life, which validates his restoration from this insanity. It additionally raises a query for the Psychiatrists and the Scientific Psychologists that given a persona like that of John Forbes Nash, Jr., what's the likelihood of restoration from the schizophrenic insanity for one more particular person?


The Lovely Thoughts.

The director has given the film the title of A Lovely Thoughts. There should have been very robust causes to take action and are certainly in reference to the richness of habits that John Forbes Nash Jr. confirmed throughout the complete span of his life – from genius to being a schizophrenic and to re-awakening. The writer’s narration of his habits stands out to show this facet of his life. For instance:

“His contemporaries, on the entire, discovered him immensely unusual.” They discovered him as “aloof,” “haughty,” “with out have an effect on,” “indifferent,” “spooky,” “remoted,” and “queer,” Nash mingled fairly than blended along with his friends. Pre-occupied along with his personal non-public actuality, he appeared to not share their mundane considerations. His manners – barely chilly, a bit superior, considerably secretive – steered one thing “mysterious and unnatural”. His remoteness was punctuated by flights of garrulousness about outer house and geo-political traits, infantile pranks, and unpredictable eruption of anger. However these outbursts have been, as a rule, as enigmatic as his silences. … “

“By his late twenties, Nash’s insights and discoveries had gained him recognition, respect, and autonomy. He had carved an excellent profession on the apex of the arithmetic occupation, traveled, lectured, taught, met essentially the most well-known mathematicians of his day, and turn into well-known himself. …”

“Nash proved a tragic exception. Beneath the good floor of his life, all was chaos and contradiction: his involvements with different males; a secret mistress and a uncared for illegitimate son; and a haunting concern of failure, …”

“Whereas Nash the person frozen in a dreamlike state, a phantom who haunted Princeton within the 1970s and 80s, scribbling on the blackboards and learning non secular texts, his title started to floor everywhere- in economics textbooks, articles on evolutionary biology, political science treatises, arithmetic journals. …”

“At seventy three John appears to be like and sounds splendidly nicely. He feels more and more sure that he gained’t endure a relapse. “It is sort of a steady course of fairly than simply waking up from a dream, he informed a New York Occasions reporter just lately. …”


That is only a sampling of his habits depicting variety of various orders as he treaded his life path. The film has quite a few examples of this variety, unfold over all the best way till the final. It's this massive habits variance that maybe motivated the director to resolve to present the movie the title of A Lovely Thoughts.



As a psychology pupil who has spent hundreds of hours speaking about mentally in poor health folks, I used to be wanting to see “A Lovely Thoughts”. I wished to see if this could be the very first film ever to painting folks with schizophrenic sickness in a sympathetic mild, to keep away from the same old stereotypes equivalent to “actually scary psychotic killer” or “impossibly bizarre bag individual”

As portrayed in “A Lovely Thoughts”, John Nash is one scary dude. From the scene the place he virtually lets his toddler son drown as a result of he's satisfied that his delusional pal Charles is watching the toddler whereas Nash is elsewhere, to the one through which he very practically assaults his spouse in response to a voice telling him she is out to get him, the movie portrays Nash as a person who at any second can cross over the road to the place his delusional concepts create actual tragedies.

However placing apart my very own agenda, I must say that the film has uncommon strengths, due to masterful performances by Russell Crowe as John Nash, and by Jennifer Connelly as his spouse Alicia.

Crowe provides a refined and exquisite efficiency, and he very practically pulls it off. Definitely he's ok within the position that I by no means as soon as thought “gladiator”. His John Nash characterization has many sides – the painfully uncomfortable boy-man at Princeton, the sardonic humorist, the deservedly boastful skilled mathematician, the scared, pitiful recipient of the complete onslaught of psychotically imagined auditory hallucinations – and these characterizations virtually work. However the younger Nash, though a standout eccentric in his early graduate research, is just not actually bizarre sufficient to painting the estrangement that should have been his lot as, within the midst of intense inventive efforts, he was already scuffling with a delusional system he couldn't at all times distinguish from actuality. And even within the throes of his worst psychotic nightmares, when he lashes out on the physician who involves intervene on his behalf, he's too contained. However what Crowe does get proper within the efficiency is rather a lot. Someway he has managed to be taught the peculiar and extremely idiosyncratic posture and gait that many individuals with schizophrenia show and which is unmistakable to the skilled eye. Notably good, I believed, was how Crowe’s Nash may recuperate from deadly social gaffes with fast wit and appeal, as for instance throughout his go to again at Princeton the place he's asking the brand new division chairman (and his previous nemesis from graduate college) if he would possibly return to the campus to show. Within the midst of their dialog, Nash is convulsed by his delusion, and lashes out at an imagined presence. He then turns to the startled chairman and asks, “Is there any means that you would overlook what I simply did?”

As Alicia, Jennifer Connelly provides a shifting efficiency as Nash’s as soon as and future spouse. Falling in love with a person who can discover all the pieces within the starry heavens, and who is aware of the universe is infinite, she is shortly disillusioned as he succumbs to an sickness which was much more of a curse in 1954 than it's right now. She withstands seeing her husband subjected to dozens of ugly insulin shock “therapies” and later, when he's house from the hospital, has to contend along with his withdrawal, lack of affection, and inventive stupor, partially unintended effects of the drug Thorazine, which was the one helpful remedy means again then. When Nash acknowledges the drug’s deleterious results on himself and stops the medicine, he's shortly thrust again into the phobia. Nonetheless, within the film at the very least, she stands by her man. She comforts him when she will, and confronts him when she should, and steadily he begins to return out of the sickness. Some might really feel that the connection of John and Alicia was the smaltziest a part of this film, the least isomorphic mapping from any of John Nash’s actual biography to the world of the silver display screen. However to me it was essentially the most actual, as a result of I've seen how vital such a relationship is to an individual struggling to emerge from psychological sickness. Subsequent to the medicine, it counts for all the pieces.

I noticed this film with the my pal who's working on the psychological well being heart.. We spent a very long time afterwards speaking about it. She mentioned one thing I believed was notably true. She mentioned, “What Ron Howard has accomplished is to present us a film not a couple of “schizophrenic”, as if the time period “schizophrenic” outlined the individual, however about an individual who occurs to have the sickness schizophrenia.”

Perhaps persons are prepared to grasp that, within the phrases of the iconoclastic hero of American psychiatry Harry Stack Sullivan, “Individuals with schizophrenia are way more human than in any other case.” I’ve had some acquaintance on a private degree with family and friends who’ve skilled psychological sickness — each bi-polar sickness (normally known as mania or manic-depressive sickness) and schizophrenia. After first seeing the film after which studying Sylvia Nasar’s guide, I've very blended feelings about each. The principle “true” factor which comes by means of in both model — is that schizophrenics do generally recuperate, or expertise lengthy intervals of “remission” because the guide describes it. Central to this, many occasions, is the help of household and recognition colleagues. In Nash’s case, many many colleagues have been exceptionally tolerant and caring — one thing extra underscored within the guide. The film makes Nash’s spouse the principle hero, plain and easy, in his restoration. The books paints a way more various and full-bodied story of life along with his spouse, his mistress, his sons (one by his spouse, one by his mistress) — and of his gay liaisons which have been additionally key to his life-long journey in the direction of changing into nicer or extra human and humane. The guide incorporates a wealth of element — a lot of it about Nash’s contemporaries fairly than about his personal life; I’d say you get about one-third Nash, two-thirds Nash’s acquaintances and firm. It’s unattainable to write down a biography, in fact, with out giving background particulars. However Nasar had nice problem making each Nash’s persona and his so-called “Lovely Thoughts” understandable or interesting. Loads of what he did and thought was extra ugly than stunning. A special title would have helped drastically, I believe. Anyway, Nasar’s means of dealing with writing about Nash himself was to take refuge in describing these round him who have been much less profitable however simpler to explain, or who have been extra excessive in persona or who achieved higher acclaim earlier than he did. She desires to point out that he, to some extent, ranks with the best thinkers of any time — folks like Nicola Tesla, Einstein, Pascal. This can be true, and when she confirmed how Nash sought to strategy the actually knotty issues, particularly these thought-about vital by many individuals — it really works. However Nasar is horrible at explaining math in its particulars or normally. She does little higher with the connection between math and applied-math fields which so typically concerned Nash instantly or ended up being vital to the applying of what he’d originated as so-called pure arithmetic. I used to be able to forgive the film for this — and whereas it provides solely a suggestion of the mathematics concerned, at the very least it does this nicely, even exceptionally — however not the guide. There are near one-hundred pages of notes on the finish of Nasar’s books — and in search of these sources is the one hope for these intrigued by Nash’s accomplishments or areas of analysis. The very best “story” of the guide, the one half well-narrated, comes close to the tip, and includes the Noble Prize and the combat between the Noble committee members over selecting Nash. It’s an awesome story. Within the guide, after it turns into clear Nash has proven indicators of recovering from schizophrenia, a gradual and regular development over ten or twenty years — Nasar raises the query of whether or not Nash may need been misdiagnosed as schizophrenic. Nobody recovers from schizophrenia, particularly with out medicine — that’s what folks used to assume, many nonetheless do — and each guide and film point out this perception. Manic-depression, nonetheless, is thought to typically be well-controlled with medicines. I’ve had oblique contact with manic-depressives and kin of them, way more so than with schizophrenics — to me there’s no query that Nash was not a manic-depressive. Alternatively, from all indications, Nash was somebody who suffered, at occasions severely, from schizophrenia, with paranoid delusions. The paranoid aspect of his sickness could also be to some extent realistically and imaginatively handled within the film. The place the film strays very removed from the reality, in a kind of Disney means, is within the creation of his imaginary school roommate after which later with the roommate’s cute little daughter who by no means ages. Nash by no means had any hallucinations or delusions of that kind; he imagined aliens have been speaking with him, and felt he’d gained data which might assist world leaders, presidents and premiers, and even sought to speak with the Pope. He did clip headlines from newspapers and magazines, because the film depicts — in reference to this paranoid-delusional obsession. The character of the roommate is well-acted, nonetheless; I personally felt it was a superb efficiency. However, be that as it could, particularly with the addition of the roommate’eone with schizophrenia — I had a sense schizophrenics and their households would discover these sequences of the movie offensive or just ridiculously unfaithful to life.. the film departs in some massive methods from the actual occasions of Nash’s life, and blunders badly with the phantom roommate aspect — it’s nonetheless an awesome movie. Nice motion pictures and nice books typically do have blunders, generally critical ones, or weak sections. On this case, I believe the film particularly may be forgiven its faults and distortions due to the problem of portraying such tough topics. By that I imply not solely Nash himself, as a persona, however extra broadly the matters of superior arithmetic and schizophrenia. Secondly, it does have its coronary heart in the fitting place — the affected person and loving care of household and associates can play a significant position in serving to mentally-ill folks (to not exclude the position of docs and medical therapies). Lastly, I believe it’s a unprecedented efficiency by Russell Crowe. He’s higher in “The Insider” — however from the all-too-little of what Nash was actually like in speech and in private mannerisms which does at occasions come by means of in Nasar’s guide — Crowe’s portrayal has parts of genius. Definitely the scriptwriter deserves recognition, right here, too — for the reason that guide offers primarily the movie’s title and little in the best way of dialog or coherent narrative thrust. .


This has bought to be among the finest movies I've ever seen! I used to be by no means an enormous Russell Crowe fan to start with, however this movie has made me right into a convert. Hats off to Ron Howard for doing such an outstanding job! This film has made such an impression on me and even after watching it, I can not assist however give it some thought and am extremely recommending it to all my associates