The significance of the complementarity between environmental
administration techniques and environmental innovation capabilities:
A agency degree strategy to environmental and enterprise
Javier Amores-Salvadó a,b,1
, Gregorio Martin-de Castro a,b,1
, José Emilio Navas-López a,1
a Departamento de Organización de Empresas, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Campus de Somosaguas s/n, 28223 Madrid, Spain
b Ikujiro Nonaka Analysis Centre for Data and Innovation, Spain
article data summary
Article historical past:
Acquired 5 November 2014
Acquired in revised kind eight April 2015
Accepted 9 April 2015
Out there on-line 28 April 2015
Utilizing a firm-level strategy to environmental innovation and drawing on the notion of agency
environmental capabilities' complementarities because the potential benefits derived from the
connection between the totally different environmental practices of the agency, we heed the decision of
environmental administration students to investigate environmental administration techniques' potential
moderating and oblique results. Extra particularly, this work analyzes the present complementarity between environmental administration techniques (EMSs) and environmental innovation
capabilities and the impact of this relationship on agency efficiency.
In an effort to attain that purpose, we take a look at empirically a novel measure of environmental administration
techniques that takes under consideration not solely the certification but in addition the diploma of growth of
the distinctive components which might be a part of these techniques. Our outcomes present that environmental
administration techniques positively average the connection between environmental product
innovation and agency market efficiency. The proposed theoretical mannequin is examined on a pattern of
157 corporations that belong to the Spanish metallic manufacturing and transformation business (one of many
most polluting) with 100 or extra workers.
© 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Environmental administration techniques
Environmental administration techniques' new
Environmental product innovation
Though there isn't a doubt that enhancing environmental
efficiency is among the main targets of environmental
administration techniques (Nawrocka and Parker, 2009), the implementation of those techniques is usually additionally associated to value and
effectivity enhancements, higher popularity and better worker
and administration involvement (Curkovic and Sroufe, 2011).
has develop into a common instrument to sign the environmental competency of the agency andits capacity to attain optimistic financial returns.
Within the final decade environmental students have analyzed
intensively the connection between EMSs—enterprise efficiency
(Darnall et al., 2008a; Hyperlink and Naveh, 2006; Darnall and
Edwards, 2006; Melnyk et al., 2003; Florida and Davison, 2001)
and EMSs—environmental efficiency (Horbach et al., 2012;
Russo, 2009; Nawrocka and Parker, 2009). However, the
results of this tutorial effort has supplied inconclusive proof
and the questions of whether or not EMSs favor or hamper efforts to
get hold of higher enterprise efficiency, or if such techniques are
efficient in enhancing environmental efficiency or, conversely, restrict corporations' modern capability, stay unsolved.
These inconsistent outcomes have been just lately remarked by
Albertini (2013) and Wagner (2008), elevating the necessity of
transferring the main focus of study away from contemplating EMSs as
main determinants of agency environmental or enterprise
efficiency, to take into accounts that EMSs do not
function in isolation and that their existence have to be understood in reference to agency's environmental assets and
capabilities. Due to this fact this research goals to spotlight the
Technological Forecasting & Social Change 96 (2015) 288–297
E-mail addresses: email@example.com (J. Amores-Salvadó),
firstname.lastname@example.org (G. Martin-de Castro), email@example.com (J.E. NavasLópez).
1 Tel.: +34 91 394 26 15, +34 91 394 25 05.
0040-1625/© 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Contents lists out there at ScienceDirect
Technological Forecasting & Social Change
significance of environmental capabilities' complementarities
(Darnall et al., 2008b), between environmental product
innovation and EMSs capabilities, because the essential aspect that
facilitates the achievement of optimistic enterprise efficiency
derived from the implementation of such techniques.
Due to this fact, by addressing Wagner's (2008) suggestions on the necessity to analyze EMSs past certification and to
completely analyze the moderating results that affect the
relationship between environmental innovation and enterprise
outcomes (Wagner, 2010), this research goals to make clear the operate
of EMSs as moderating components within the environmental
innovation–enterprise efficiency relationship. To this finish we
emphasize the significance of environmental capabilities'
complementarities (Darnall et al., 2008b), between environmental product innovation and EMSs, because the essential aspect
that facilitates the achievement of optimistic enterprise efficiency derived from the implementation of such techniques.
To realize this goal, we transcend certification and
additional develop Wagner's (2009) final proposal utilizing an
modern measure of EMSs that considers not solely certification but in addition the scope and comprehensiveness (Darnall et al.,
2008a) of such techniques (considering the diploma of
growth of the distinctive components which might be a part of these
techniques). As well as, to deal with the calls from establishments and
authors that demand a stronger presence of merchandise within the
environmental administration analysis (Rennings et al., 2006;
Rehfeld et al., 2007), we examine the environmental product
improvements as a measure of environmental efficiency (First
and Khetriwal, 2010).
The article is organized as follows: first, it analyzes the
present views on the position of EMSs, to subsequently
comment the necessity to change the main focus of study and take into account
EMSs, as a substitute of as main determinants of environmental
and aggressive efficiency, as contributing components –
by way of its moderating position – towards that finish. Lastly, after
explaining the methodological points of the work, our outcomes
and conclusions are offered along with some future
2. Theoretical framework and speculation growth
EMSs are thought of as “delicate” environmental coverage devices in distinction to much less versatile devices, akin to
regulation (Iraldo et al., 2009) and symbolize an organizational
change and a self-regulation effort on the a part of companies
that encompass defining a set of formal environmental insurance policies,
objectives, methods and administrative procedures aimed to
enhance the environmental efficiency of the group
(Anton et al., 2004).
Drawing upon the resource-based view postulates, the
Pure Useful resource-Primarily based View (Hart, 1995), argues that EMSs
(in an identical approach that Whole High quality Administration Programs)
contribute to the event of tacit abilities, that are hardly
replicable by different corporations and subsequently can facilitate aggressive benefit achievement. On this sense, they enhance the
organizational capital of the agency, putting in the
environmental administration and administrative processes
that can information the environmental motion of the corporate. In
different phrases, EMSs create the mandatory circumstances for
environmental capabilities to be extra environment friendly, contributing
this technique to strengthen the environmental orientation of the
agency and facilitating that environmental issues develop into
an integral aspect of enterprise technique (Darnall, 2006).
Thus, from the resource-based view perspective, EMSs
have the potential to allow organizations to lower the
environmental affect of their actions, and to enhance the
high quality of corporations' operations, offering coordination within the
seek for environmental targets that may end up in operational efficiencies and aggressive benefits (Bansal and
However, though earlier arguments counsel that
these techniques have optimistic environmental and aggressive
results, neither their environmental efficiency enhancements nor their aggressive advantages are clear for the academia.
As we are going to present beneath, the empirical literature across the
subject is inconclusive, revealing the necessity of re-examining the
position of EMSs within the environmental administration of the corporations.
2.1. Present views on the position of environmental administration techniques
The significance that has been granted to the EMSs within the
final decade is such that many authors have signaled their mere
existence because the essential issue to be thought of to clarify corporations'
environmental and enterprise efficiency enhancements.
This primary assumption is supported by two primary streams
that advance in parallel and characterize the literature on the
subject. One analysis perspective focuses on the consequences of those
techniques in aggressive phrases, whereas the opposite perspective
analyzes the connection between EMSs and totally different
measures of environmental efficiency.
Among the many research that point out the optimistic impact of EMSs
on agency efficiency, we are able to discover contributions that affiliate
these techniques with decreased prices and improved competitiveness (Melnyk et al., 2003; Darnall, 2006), elevated
enterprise quantity and exports (Rennings et al., 2006), aggressive benefits (Delmas, 2001) and agency popularity and picture
enhancements (Wagner and Schaltegger, 2004; Bansal and
Hunter, 2003). As well as, these techniques are additionally related
with improved operational efficiency and enhancements in
the product high quality (Delmas and Grant, 2014) and within the
positioning of the enterprise out there (Sroufe, 2003).
However, there are additionally important contributions that
don't share this optimistic perspective. For instance, Hyperlink and
Naveh (2006) discover no proof to assist a optimistic relationship between ISO 14001 certification and agency efficiency,
and Iraldo et al. (2009) take into account that the adoption of an
environmental administration system (licensed or not) on its
personal, doesn't suffice to enhance corporations' competitiveness. Within the
similar vein, different students argue that these standardized
techniques can represent a restrict and an impediment to corporations'
modern capabilities (Könola and Unruh, 2007), in addition to
a further supply of value (Darnall and Edwards, 2006). In
addition, it's argued that EMSs are sometimes helpful devices to
scale back the strain from nearly all of stakeholders
(Lannelongue and González-Benito, 2012). That's, they play
primarily a legitimizing position (Bansal and Hunter, 2003) that
doesn't essentially translate immediately into improved outcomes.
However, a wide range of contributions have additionally
analyzed the determinant position of EMSs of their relationship
with agency environmental efficiency.
J. Amores-Salvadó et al. / Technological Forecasting & Social Change 96 (2015) 288–297 289
Extra particularly, authors have remarked the connection
between EMS implementation and environmental product
improvements as a optimistic signal of agency environmental
progress. Thus, the necessities derived from EMSs usually
suggest the efficiency of inside analyses that may end up in
environmental product improvements geared towards satisfying the calls for of extra conscientious customers (Wagner
et al., 2001). EMSs have the facility to contain organizations
in superior environmental methods centered on
redesigning merchandise and decreasing the environmental
affect of such merchandise all through their life cycle (Darnall
and Edwards, 2006).
Some proof of the connection between these techniques and the environmental product improvements will be
present in Cleff and Rennings (1999) and Rennings et al.
(2006). The previous relate “delicate” environmental coverage
devices with product improvements. The latter show how the totally different traits of a specific
environmental administration system have totally different results
on some of these innovation. Extra particularly, the educational
processes derived from these techniques present important
optimistic results on environmental product improvements.
In the identical line, Rehfeld et al. (2007) show that
the ISO 14001 certification or the Eco-Administration and
Audit Scheme (EMAS) verification are associated to environmental product improvements as a result of they stimulate companies to evaluate their present procedures to search out methods to
enhance their merchandise. Equally, Horbach (2008) demonstrates that environmental administration instruments are vital
for introducing environmental product improvements, and
Kammerer (2009) finds a optimistic relationship between
inexperienced capabilities (derived from, e.g., EMSs) and these varieties
Nevertheless, from one other perspective, Wagner (2008) demonstrates that environmental product improvements are extra
associated with specific actions in environmental administration (market analysis on “inexperienced” merchandise, environmental
labeling or the supply of knowledge to customers on the
environmental results of merchandise) than with the implementation of EMSs. Frondel et al. (2008) discover no proof that
associates EMS with technological environmental improvements
and in the identical vein Horbach et al. (2012) emphasize the much less
vital position that organizational improvements akin to EMSs
play within the creation of environmental product improvements.
Within the mild of those outcomes, and as acknowledged by Del Río
González (2009) and Demirel and Kesidou (2011), the
proof of a direct relationship between EMSs and the
environmental efficiency of corporations shouldn't be conclusive.
In sum, one primary conclusion will be drawn from earlier
analyses: Regardless of their worldwide reputation, the empirical
proof means that the mere existence of EMSs doesn't
assure higher aggressive outcomes (Albertini, 2013) or
improved environmental efficiency (Del Río González,
2009; Demirel and Kesidou, 2011). Which means that, by
themselves, these techniques can't be thought of as main
determinants of environmental and aggressive success.
Due to this fact, as we've got beforehand remarked, we argue that it
is important to alter the main focus of study and take into account EMSs,
as a substitute of remoted, in reference to corporations' environmental
assets and capabilities; as a substitute of as main determinants of
environmental and aggressive efficiency, as contributing
components towards that finish. To the event of those
arguments, we are going to commit the following part.
2.2. Connecting environmental administration techniques and environmental innovation capabilities: Towards an integrative perspective on environmental and agency efficiency
As famous, within the final decade the environmental and
aggressive implications of EMSs' have been the main focus of
nice curiosity amongst environmental students. However,
possibly due to their nice reputation, worldwide significance or market penetration, most contributions have ignored
the significance of corporations' assets and capabilities for EMS
environmental and aggressive success. On this sense, we argue
that the financial success of EMS implementations lies within the
complementary relationship between these techniques and corporations'
environmental innovation capabilities in order that, when EMSs are
current, the energy of the connection between environmental innovation and agency efficiency relies on the complementarities between these techniques and the environmental
innovation capabilities of the agency.
As environmental coverage devices, EMSs are presupposed to
have an amazing affect within the environmental efficiency–
enterprise efficiency relationship. In truth, the affect of
these techniques (which is a main level in our evaluation) can't
solely be restricted to environmental efficiency or financial
efficiency as two remoted ideas. A broader view of the
phenomenon is important, which analyzes its position as a
moderating aspect (Melnyk et al., 2003) and helps make clear its
This strategy finds match with the resource-based view
logic and extra particularly with the Pure Useful resource-Primarily based
View (Hart, 1995). Based on the Pure Useful resource-Primarily based
View, EMSs not solely affect and drive modern capabilities
but in addition create aggressive benefits for companies that
implement them. The theoretical background of this argument
relies on the truth that the means invested by an organization to
implement and accurately conduct these techniques are intently
linked to a sequence of pre-existing assets and capabilities
(Darnall, 2006), which might be troublesome to mimic by opponents
as a result of they rely upon a specific path and incorporate an
vital part of tacit data (Florida, 1996;
Rugman and Berbeke, 1998).
Due to this fact, the achievement of enhancements within the
environmental area and within the financial area can be based mostly
to a big diploma on the connection between these administration techniques and corporations' current assets and capabilities
(Melnyk et al., 2003; González-Benito and González-Benito,
2008; Khanna et al., 2009). Whereas EMSs represent the guiding
environmental organizational capital (environmental procedures and norms), environmental improvements are environmental technological capital that outcome from corporations'
technological efforts on this area, and the connection between
these two will result in improved financial efficiency.
This attitude of integration between environmental
and financial efficiency is utilized by Rennings et al. (2006),
who emphasize the significance of the bond between environmental administration and innovation to improved enterprise
competitiveness, and by Iraldo et al. (2009) that additionally comment
the aggressive relevance of the oblique impact that administration techniques have on environmental efficiency.
290 J. Amores-Salvadó et al. / Technological Forecasting & Social Change 96 (2015) 288–297
Equally, and from a perspective centered on merchandise,
Darnall and Edwards (2006) emphasize how the joint results of
the capabilities for redesigning and growing new merchandise
with a smaller environmental affect and the EMSs are
related to improved effectivity and aggressive benefit. Likewise, Kammerer (2009) and Darnall et al. (2008a,b)
spotlight that EMSs facilitate the administration of environmental product improvements that in flip allow the restoration of
investments made by way of the rise within the demand for
Due to this fact, as Horbach et al. (2012) have just lately famous,
EMSs play a related position in acquiring financial advantages based mostly
on environmental product improvements as a result of they assist
overcome coordination issues that hamper the financial
exploitation of some of these improvements. Thus, the connection between environmental product innovation and agency
efficiency is facilitated by the existence of EMSs, which assist
to completely exploit the potential financial returns of those sorts of
All these earlier arguments represent the central theme
of our proposal and lead us to formulate our distinctive and primary
H1. Environmental administration techniques positively average the connection between environmental product improvements and agency efficiency.
Meaning, following Muller et al. (2005), that the
magnitude of the informal impact of environmental product
innovation on agency efficiency relies on the EMS worth.
Based on this strategy, to show moderation, we
will estimate the next abbreviated mannequin:
Y ¼ β10 þ β11X þ β12EMS þ β13XEMS þ ε1:
the place Y = agency efficiency; X = environmental product
innovation; EMS = environmental administration techniques;
XEMS = environmental product innovation EMS interplay.
And the importance of ß13 exhibits that the magnitude of
Environmental Product Innovation on Agency Efficiency varies
as a operate of the worth of the moderator (Environmental
three. Pattern and knowledge assortment
We have now developed our empirical evaluation on corporations that
belong to the metallic manufacturing and transformation business
(one of the crucial polluting and extra inclined to implement
environmental improvements), with 100 or extra workers
(with sufficient assets to handle and develop environmental
applied sciences). Particularly, the goal firms of this
analysis are people who belong to the sectors talked about by
Regulation 16/2002 of July 1st and denominated Built-in Air pollution
Prevention and Management (IPPC). Of the commercial classes
referred to in that regulation, our empirical research is concentrated on the
class that corresponds to the manufacturing and processing of
metals (2007 NACE classification codes from 24 to 32), which
consists of metallurgy, iron fabrication, metal, ferroalloy merchandise
and metallic merchandise. These firms function amenities or
smelters of huge capability which might be potential sources of serious
air pollution, as just lately famous by Demirel and Kesidou (2011).
On this sense, we've got centered on an fascinating and
steadily ignored facet of this sector. Though the manufacturing and processing of metals are identified to generate extra
course of than product improvements, we consider, following Moors
et al. (2005), that the iron and metal business additionally affords
fascinating ecological alternate options for product improvements,
akin to using supplies with a decrease proportion of iron
throughout zinc manufacturing, the smelting of recycled aluminum
throughout aluminum manufacturing and lengthening the helpful lifetime of
compounds by re-using zinc and aluminum within the manufacturing
of iron and metal. Due to this fact, so as to analyze this much less effectively
identified actuality, we've got centered on product improvements.
The goal inhabitants consists of 733 firms of 100 or
extra workers, and was studied and chosen utilizing the
Iberian Stability Sheet Evaluation System (SABI, utilizing its initials in
Spanish) and the Amadeus databases. The primary model of the
questionnaire was despatched to a few well-regarded researchers in
the environmental administration area, which enabled us to
consider the relevance of the questions. Then, we ran pilot take a look at
with 10 firms to find out if the questions had been clearly
written and comprehensible. Lastly, knowledge assortment was begun
throughout the first half of 2011 by way of a phone questionnaire
directed towards two certified informants. One informant was
accountable for environmental innovation or innovation in
basic and answered the questions associated to the environmental product improvements and EMSs. The opposite informant
was accountable for funds and answered the questions
associated to agency efficiency. Thus, the opinions of two varieties
of informants in every firm had been obtained, with the purpose of
avoiding the widespread methodology variance bias (Chang et al.,
On this approach, 157 legitimate questionnaires had been obtained, which
symbolize a response fee of 21.three% and a pattern error of
+/−6.9% at a 95% confidence degree. We contrasted the
representativeness of the pattern by a comparative evaluation of
the dimensions and age of the businesses that represent the pattern
and the inhabitants. Thus, we calculated a wide range of statistical
measures of central tendency and variability (Desk 1). After
that, we run a t-test (Zenger and Lawrence, 1989) and analyzed
the presence of variations between arithmetic means within the
firms within the pattern and the inhabitants with respect to
their measurement and age.
Because of this take a look at, we obtained a p-value of p = Zero.316
for agency measurement and p = Zero.442 for agency age at a 95% confidence
degree. As a result of each values are larger than Zero.05, we reject the
null speculation of there being a major distinction between
the technique of the pattern and people of the research's goal
Pattern statistical representativity.
Statistic Age Measurement
Pattern normal deviation
(Inhabitants normal deviation)
J. Amores-Salvadó et al. / Technological Forecasting & Social Change 96 (2015) 288–297 291
Following the identical process, the presence of nonresponse bias was analyzed based mostly on measurement (Armstrong and
Overton, 1977), acquiring a p-value of p = Zero.220 at a 95%
confidence degree. The truth that the p-value is larger than Zero.05
confirms that there isn't a non-response bias between the
firms that cooperated with the research and people who did
four. Measurement of the variables
The variables had been measured utilizing the subjective perceptions of the totally different teams of managers consulted on a sevenpoint Likert scale (Aragón-Correa et al., 2008; Christmann,
To measure the variable environmental product innovation,
and following different authors which have centered on the
environmental traits of the merchandise as a manifestation of environmental efficiency (First and Khetriwal, 2010),
we used an strategy that considers the optimization benefits derived from the environmental enhancements in
product design. Particularly, the symptoms seek advice from design
modifications within the merchandise which might be geared towards decreasing
the amount of fabric used (Chen et al., 2006; Dangelico and
Pujari, 2010), utilizing recyclable parts (González-Benito
and González-Benito, 2008) and growing the product's helpful
lifetime (Kammerer, 2009). Thus, these people who had been
accountable for innovation/setting within the sampled
firms had been requested to guage whether or not their firms
had carried out modifications in product design akin to these
talked about beforehand in response to a seven-point Likert scale
(1: “we've got by no means considered implementing the sort of
change/modification to our merchandise”; 7: “the sort of change/
modification of merchandise is important for us”).
With respect to EMS measurement, we adopted a novel
perspective that goes past ISO 14001 certification or EMAS
validation. As a substitute, and contemplating that these techniques can fluctuate
significantly between firms, which will be licensed or not
(Darnall and Edwards, 2006), we consider the implementation
of an environmental administration system based mostly on its
constituent components, not solely as a operate of certifications.
Analysis based mostly solely on certifications has been criticized
(Wagner, 2008; Lannelongue and González-Benito, 2012) for
limiting the true results of EMSs on environmental product and
course of improvements and since implementing these techniques
will be motivated by opportunistic behaviors quite than
environmental efficiency enhancements.
Due to this fact, along with the certification and to additional
examine EMSs, we observe Wagner (2008), Darnall and
Edwards (2008), and Darnall et al. (2008a,b) and likewise take into account
the existence of those particular components in EMSs: a) a written
environmental coverage, b) recognized and documented environmental impacts, c) measureable and contrastable environmental
targets, d) the definition of environmental tasks,
e) environmental studying packages for workers, f) the
enchancment of communication buildings for environmental
info and g) procedures for the periodical analysis of
environmental compliance. Thus, these people accountable
for improvements/setting within the firms surveyed had been
requested to guage whether or not their firms had carried out
the beforehand talked about environmental practices utilizing a
seven-point Likert scale (1: “we've got by no means considered
implementing the sort of follow”; 7: “the sort of follow is
important for us”).
Agency efficiency manifests itself in numerous methods
(Venkatraman and Ramanukan, 1986; González-Benito et al.,
2012). Particularly, in our analysis we are able to confirm whether or not
environmental enhancements of merchandise have resulted in
gross sales progress for companies situated on the intermediate factors
of the worth system, akin to enterprise centered on metallic
manufacturing and transformation, which have their main
markets in automotive, development and naval development
firms (Dahlström and Ekins, 2006). Due to this fact, we've got
adopted market outcomes as our agency efficiency measure for
the businesses within the sector. We emphasize progress in market
share (Decide and Douglas, 1998; Karagozoglu and Lindell,
2000; Triebswetter and Wackerbauer, 2008; Iraldo et al., 2009),
gross sales progress (Newbert, 2008; Menguc et al., 2010) and gross sales
per worker (Hyperlink and Naveh, 2006) associated to opponents
(Christmann, 2000) throughout the previous two years. This
strategy is justified by the truth that the consequences of environmental innovation actions described right here translate into outcomes a
minimal of two years after they're carried out (Hart and
Lastly, as a result of agency measurement and agency age can affect the
growth of environmental improvements (greater and extra
skilled corporations are presupposed to have extra assets and
capabilities to implement these form of improvements), agency measurement
and agency age had been thought of as management variables. Primarily based on the
analysis of different authors within the environmental area, akin to
Cleff and Rennings (1999), Delmas (2001), Wagner (2009) and
Ziegler and Nogareda (2009), Rehfeld et al. (2007), agency measurement
and agency age had been measured utilizing the variety of workers
and the years for the reason that basis of the corporate respectively.
5. Measurement properties
Probably the most distinguished facet of our measurement strategy
is the utilization of a complete EMS's measure. Beside
the certification (sure/no), the symptoms that represent the
scale of components inherent in EMSs are additionally reworked into
categorical values. On this sense, the brand new EMS measure that we
are empirically testing in our analysis takes under consideration two
primary issues: 1) the existence or lack of ISO 14001
certification or EMAS verification (taking the worth of 1 when
the corporate has the certification and Zero when it doesn't) and
2) the imply analysis of the presence of the weather of an
environmental administration system as detailed in Part four.
The presence of such components is represented by Likert scales
1–7. When the imply within the compliance of those components is
equal to or larger than four, we assume that the corporate has
undergone a big diploma of growth within the measures that
represent an environmental administration system (granting
the worth of 1 to that firm). When the other is true, we
assume that the diploma of growth of those components is
decreased (granting the worth of Zero).
As well as, an aiming to measure the environmental
product innovation and agency efficiency variables, an exploratory issue evaluation was carried out. On this evaluation, the
respective issue weights and their reliability had been examined
utilizing Cronbach's alpha and the composite reliability index
292 J. Amores-Salvadó et al. / Technological Forecasting & Social Change 96 (2015) 288–297
Thus, two elements had been generated utilizing Varimax rotations
that correspond to the objects of environmental product
innovation and agency market efficiency, respectively. The
primary indexes obtained reveal the comfort of this issue
evaluation (Hair et al., 2004). The Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin (KMO)
index (with values that oscillate between Zero and 1) reveals
values larger than Zero.7 (Zero.724), which point out the presence of
partial correlations between objects. Equally, all the objects in
each elements show weights larger than Zero.eight, and the
Cronbach's alpha values exhibit scores larger than Zero.eight for
every of the elements, which is in accordance with typically
accepted requirements as an indication of reliability. As well as, we've got
additionally calculated the composite reliability of the constructs,
which has been urged by the academy as a greater measure
of reliability (Desk 2). Due to this fact, composite reliability values
had been above the commonly accepted threshold of Zero.70 (Fornell
and Larcker, 1981) with Zero.920 for environmental product
innovation and Zero.931 for agency market outcomes. Lastly, the
proportion of amassed defined variance for these two
elements was 81. 145, being increased than the proposed worth for
social science: 60%.
On this part, to evaluate the character of the connection
between our primary unbiased variables (environmental
product innovation, EMSs) and our dependent variable (agency
market efficiency) we are going to take a look at our primary speculation
beforehand detailed in Part 2 by way of a moderation mannequin
(M1) that corresponds to the relationships depicted in Fig. 1.
Agency's measurement and corporations' age can be used as management variables.
As Desk three exhibits, mannequin M0 reviews the regression with
solely the management variables (agency measurement and agency age). On this
mannequin, statistical F worth doesn't present the existence of any
important linear relation, so agency measurement and agency age do not have
any statistical significance impact on agency market efficiency.
Our primary assumption is reported in Mannequin M1 which
corresponds to speculation H1, and reviews the connection
between environmental product innovation and agency market
efficiency utilizing the environmental administration system
variable as moderator (interplay impact) and agency measurement and age
as management variables. On this case, as we are able to see in Desk three, mannequin
M1 exhibits the existence of a optimistic and important interplay
impact of the environmental administration system variable on
the connection between environmental product innovation
and agency efficiency and likewise a optimistic and important
(though much less important) impact of environmental product
innovation on agency market efficiency. Moreover, Durbin–
Watson's values for mannequin M1 point out that the residuals are
unbiased, and statistical F values present a major linear
relation for the proposed interplay impact, proving the
existence of statistical validity.
Our outcomes give assist to the primary argument of this work,
as mannequin M1 and speculation H1 exhibits. Thus, the interplay
impact of EMSs on the connection between environmental
Issue evaluation and reliability.
Environmental product innovation objects EPI (EPI_1)—We have now modified our merchandise' design to make use of fewer materials of their elaboration Zero.889
EPI (EPI _2)—We have now modified our merchandise' design to increase its helpful life Zero.923
EPI (EPI _3)—We have now modified our merchandise' design by utilizing recyclable parts Zero.857
Market efficiency objects RES (MK_1)—In relation to our primary opponents we're happy with firm's market share
progress within the final two years
RES (MK_2)—In relation to our primary opponents we're happy with firm's gross sales progress
within the final two years
RES (MK_3)—In relation to our primary opponents we're happy with firm's gross sales per
worker fee progress within the final two years
Defined variance (%) 41.245 39.900
Accrued variance (%) 41.245 81.145
Cronbach's alpha Zero.894 Zero.872
Composite reliability Zero.931 Zero.920
Fig. 1. The moderating position of environmental administration techniques.
Agency market efficiency
Agency sizea −.119 −.103
Agency ageb .026 .018
EMS large .114
EProduct innovation .153*
EMS Widex EProduct innovation .165**
R .123 .278
R2 .015 .077
Corrected R2 .Zero02 .047
Typical error .998 .976
Durbin–Watson 1.880 1.952
F 1.179 2.534
***Important at p b .01, **Important at p b .05, and *Important at p b .10. a Reciprocal transformation to make sure variable normality (Rehfeld et al., 2007). b Logarithmic transformation to make sure variable normality (Wagner, 2008).
J. Amores-Salvadó et al. / Technological Forecasting & Social Change 96 (2015) 288–297 293
product innovation and agency market efficiency is optimistic
and statistically important. Which means that, as urged
beforehand in our theoretical evaluation, EMSs play a moderating
position (Fig. 2) within the relationship between environmental product
innovation and agency market efficiency, performing as supporting
elements that allow the achievement of optimistic enterprise outcomes
from environmental product improvements. However, these
outcomes have to be interpreted cautiously for the reason that R^2 worth is
solely Zero.077, thus limiting the explanatory energy of the mannequin.
Which means that along with the unbiased variables that
we've got considered there have to be quite a few
further elements not included in our mannequin that will clarify
additionally the variation of corporations' market efficiency. Amongst these
elements we are able to discover the environmental orientation of the agency
perceived by the purchasers (Menguc and Ozanne, 2005), or the
environmental advertising insurance policies of the group (Menon
and Menon, 1997), to say only a few.
As Fig. 2 exhibits, at low ranges of environmental product
innovation, agency market efficiency doesn't enhance even
when the environmental administration system indicator is excessive.
Conversely, when the extent of environmental product innovation will get increased, a better worth of the indicator of environmental
administration system improves considerably agency market efficiency. This proof is according to our primary theoretical
assumptions and corroborates that EMSs can play a key position in
corporations' efficiency enhancements if they're complemented by
sturdy environmental innovation capabilities.
However, such profitable mixture is a troublesome one
and isn't out there for all of the corporations in our pattern (please see
Fig. three the place every agency mixture of EMS efficiency and
environmental product innovation efficiency is represented
by a circle).
As Fig. three exhibits, the EMS efficiency degree stays excessive for
most corporations within the pattern (see quadrants Q1 and Q2), whereas the
environmental product innovation efficiency degree is topic
to extra variations and almost half of all sampled corporations present a
poor efficiency (see quadrant Q1). That signifies that reaching
excessive ranges of compliance in environmental product innovation
is rather more sophisticated for the sampled corporations. Due to this fact, at
the sunshine of the outcomes, the large problem for many corporations within the
Low Env. Product
Excessive Env. Product
Agency Market Efficiency
12 three four 5 6 7
Supply: Personal elaboration from Dawson (2013)
Fig. 2. Environmental administration techniques. Moderation results. Supply: Personal
elaboration from Dawson (2013).
Supply: Personal elaboration
Fig. three. Sampled corporations' environmental administration techniques and environmental product innovation efficiency ranges. Supply: Personal elaboration.
294 J. Amores-Salvadó et al. / Technological Forecasting & Social Change 96 (2015) 288–297
manufacturing and processing of metals sector appears to be the
enchancment of their product innovation capabilities.
7. Dialogue and conclusions
Our primary purpose was to investigate the complementarity
between EMSs and environmental innovation capabilities and
contribute to the clarification of the position performed by these
techniques. As we've got highlighted earlier than, the literature about
the subject exhibits a scarcity of consensus concerning the true
contribution of those techniques and it isn't clear whether or not they
foster or inhibit agency's environmental improvements or whether or not
they contribute or to not improve agency efficiency.
We have now argued that behind this lack of consensus there's
one primary arising query that we've got tried to reply in our
This query has to do with the overall strategy to the
drawback. Though the existence of direct relationships
between EMSs and innovation or efficiency outputs would
be very fascinating and interesting for corporations (since innovation
and efficiency outcomes would seem with the only
implementation of those techniques) the inconclusive outcomes
derived from our literature evaluate counsel that the mere
existence of EMSs doesn't assure improved environmental
innovation or agency efficiency outcomes. Due to this fact, it's
essential to alter the main focus of study and take into account EMSs,
as a substitute of remoted, in reference to corporations' environmental
assets and capabilities.
Thus, EMS contribution to agency innovation and enterprise
efficiency is extra refined and sophisticated as Wagner (2010)
suggests. Due to this fact, we declare, in the identical line than different
environmental students (Aragón-Correa and Rubio-López,
2007; Ziegler and Nogareda, 2009; Darnall and Edwards,
2006) that these requirements are helpful and actually contribute
to enhance agency efficiency when they're complemented
with environmental innovation capabilities. This implies, in response to our outcomes, that EMSs play an vital position
facilitating the administration of the environmental product
improvements, serving to to coordinate higher the method and remedy
the potential issues that will come up (Horbach et al., 2012),
they're, as Bansal and Hunter (2003) argue, reinforcing
Due to this fact, by way of the ample mixture of those
techniques with the environmental product innovation capabilities, corporations will have the ability to exploit very beneficial complementarities (Darnall et al., 2008b) and put into follow an environment friendly
guided creativity that, aided by the appropriated managerial
assist, will cause them to improved market efficiency
outcomes. In different phrases, our empirical proof offers assist to
the idea that the EMSs play a moderating position
(interplay impact) within the relationship between environmental
product innovation and market efficiency outcomes, as our
speculation H1 suggests. On this sense, as the primary implication
to enterprise follow we are able to spotlight that agency managers, in
order to take advantage of the complete potential of EMSs – past the
“certification impact” –, should develop these pre current
environmental innovation capabilities which, appropriately
guided and strengthened by EMSs' components, will result in agency
As well as, we've got examined empirically a novel measure of
environmental administration techniques. As Wagner (2008)
suggests, EMSs should be analyzed considering not
solely the certification but in addition the primary components that conform
these techniques so as to detect corporations' opportunistic behaviors
and to mirror the truth that many corporations have carried out
their very own techniques with out being certificated.
Due to this fact, we've got empirically examined a brand new environmental
administration system indicator that takes under consideration all these
points on the similar time (certification and primary environmental
administration system components), hoping to contribute to make clear
the true scope and performance of those techniques.
Our work additionally helped us to investigate the position of agency measurement and
agency age within the beforehand thought of relationships. On this
sense, we've got discovered that agency measurement and agency age do not present
any important impact (Horbach, 2008; Demirel and Kesidou,
2011; Wagner, 2007). This proof means that the potential
connections and complementarities between EMSs' norms and
procedures and environmental innovation rely primarily
and critically on the organizational capabilities and coordination mechanisms that corporations are capable of implement as a substitute of on
the dimensions or age of the organizations. Due to this fact, the outcomes are in
line with the Pure Useful resource-Primarily based view postulates (Hart,
1995; Aragón-Correa et al., 2008) and enhances different
contributions that utilizing additionally a firm-level strategy to environmental innovation analyze the determinants of environmental
innovation actions (Chassagnon and Haned, 2015). On this
sense, our work, as a substitute of analyzing the determinants of the
environmental improvements, takes a complementary perspective and a better look to the interior mechanisms of the agency that
clarify the environmental innovation success.
However, this work shouldn't be exempt from limitations. In
this sense, our perspective is restricted to the interior evaluation
of the agency, specifically to corporations' assets and capabilities,
with out considering the important thing position that the
stakeholders, when it comes to social demand articulation (Lee
et al., 2006), play within the growth of environmental product
improvements. As well as, our outcomes are largely derived from
the managers' subjective perceptions (two totally different teams of
managers had been consulted in our questionnaire so as to
keep away from the widespread methodology bias) due to the dearth of firmlevel environmental databases of public entry (López-Gamero
et al., 2010). And lastly, these and can't be generalized, since
our proof is proscribed to a small variety of corporations belonging to
related industries in a specific second in time.
Some future analysis instructions will be drawn from our
work. Utilizing this someway slender and restricted perspective, our
proof exhibits that the EMSs, as expressions of the “inexperienced
formalization” of the agency, play an interplay (moderation)
position and contribute to the event of environmental
innovation capabilities. On this sense, the congruence between
what we are able to name “inexperienced formalization” and inexperienced social
capital –that we do not discover on this paper – will be interpreted
as equal to the tight and free organizational designs
(Russo and Harrison, 2005) and might be defined by way of the
ambidextrous group principle, which constitutes one other
persuasive perspective that has not acquired nice consideration in
the inexperienced administration literature.
As well as, different organizational capabilities additionally should be
considered. For instance, latest contributions
on the subject of absorptive capability (Delmas et al., 2011) and
mental capital (Delmas and Pekovic, 2013) may also be
utilized to the EMS literature.
J. Amores-Salvadó et al. / Technological Forecasting & Social Change 96 (2015) 288–297 295
We want to thank all of the establishments whose assist
has made this investigation attainable, significantly the Spanish
Ministry of Science and Innovation (Undertaking ECO2009-12405)
and the Ikujiro Nonaka Analysis Centre for Data and
Innovation at CUNEF (Colegio Universitario de Estudios
Appendix A. Measurement objects (1–7 Likert scales)
A.1. Environmental product innovation
EPI_1: Has your organization carried out merchandise design
modifications geared towards decreasing the amount of
materials used of their elaboration?
EPI_2: Has your organization carried out merchandise design
modifications geared towards growing the product's
EPI_3: Has your organization carried out merchandise design
modifications by utilizing recyclable parts?
A.2. Environmental administration techniques
EMS_1: Does your organization have a written environmental
EMS_2: Are your organization's environmental impacts clearly
outlined and documented?
EMS_3: Does your organization have measurable environmental
EMS_4: Are your organization's environmental tasks
EMS_5: Does your organization set up environmental studying
classes for workers?
EMS_6: Does your organization have improved its environmental
info communication buildings?
EMS_7: Does your organization have its personal periodical procedures for environmental evaluation?
A.three. Agency market efficiency
Within the final two years, has your organization reached passable
outcomes (in comparison with opponents) in relation to…
RES (MK_1): Market share progress?
RES (MK_2): Gross sales progress?
RES (MK_3): Gross sales per worker?
A.four. Management variables
FirmSize Variety of workers (reciprocal transformation)
FirmAge Variety of years for the reason that basis of the corporate
Appendix B. Supplementary knowledge
Supplementary knowledge to this text will be discovered on-line at
Albertini, E., 2013. Does environmental administration enhance monetary
efficiency? A meta-analytical evaluate. Organ. Environ. 28, 431–457.
Anton, W.R., Deltas, G., Khanna, M., 2004. Incentives for environmental selfregulation and implications for environmental efficiency. J. Environ.
Econ. Manag. 48, 632–654.
Aragón-Correa, J.A., Rubio-López, E., 2007. Proactive company environmental
methods: myths and misunderstandings. Lengthy Vary Plan. 40, 357–381.
Aragón-Correa, J.A., Hurtado-Torres, N., Sharma, S., García Morales, V.J., 2008.
Environmental technique and efficiency in small corporations: a resource-based
perspective. J. Environ. Manag. 86, 88–103.
Armstrong, J.S., Overton, T.S., 1977. Estimating nonresponse bias in mail
surveys. J. Mark. Res. 14, 396–402.
Bansal, P., Hunter, T., 2003. Strategic explanations for the early adoption of ISO
14001. J. Bus. Ethics 46, 289–299.
Chang, S.J.,Witteloostuijn, A.V., Eden, L., 2010. From the Editors: Frequent methodology
variance in worldwide enterprise analysis. J. Int. Bus. Stud. 41, 178–184.
Chassagnon, V., Haned, N., 2015. The relevance of innovation management for
environmental advantages: a agency degree empirical evaluation on French corporations.
Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 91, 194–207. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.
Chen, Y.S., Lai, S.B., Wen, C.T., 2006. The affect of inexperienced innovation
efficiency on company benefit in Taiwan. J. Bus. Ethics 67, 331–339.
Christmann, P., 2000. Results of “greatest practices” of environmental administration
on value benefit: the position of complementary property. Acad. Manag. J. 43,
Cleff, T., Rennings, Ok., 1999. Determinants of environmental product and
course of innovation. Eur. Environ. 9, 191–201.
Curkovic, S., Sroufe, R., 2011. Utilizing ISO14001 to advertise a sustainable provide
chain technique. Bus. Strateg. Environ. 20, 71–93.
Dahlström, Ok., Ekins, P., 2006. Combining financial and environmental
dimensions: worth chain evaluation of UK iron and metal flows. Ecol. Econ.
Dangelico, R.M., Pujari, D., 2010. Mainstreaming inexperienced product innovation: why
and the way firms combine environmental sustainability. J. Bus. Ethics
Darnall, N., 2006. Why corporations mandate ISO 14001 certification? Bus. Soc. 45,
Darnall, N., Edwards, D., 2006. Predicting the price of environmental administration system adoption: the position of capabilities, assets and possession
construction. Strateg. Manag. J. 27, 301–320.
Darnall, N., Henriques, I., Sadorsky, P., 2008a. Do environmental administration
techniques enhance enterprise efficiency in a world setting? J. Int.
Manag. 14, 364–376.
Darnall, N., Edwards, D., 2006. Predicting the price of environmental administration techniques adoption: The position of capabilities, assets and possession
construction. Strateg. Manag. J. 27, 301–320.
Darnall, N., Jolley, G.J., Handfield, R., 2008b. Environmental administration
techniques and inexperienced provide administration: enhances for sustainability?
Bus. Strateg. Environ. 17, 30–45.
Dawson, J.F., 2013. Moderation in administration analysis: what, why, when and
how. J. Bus. Psychol. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10869-Zero13-9308-7.
Del Río González, P., 2009. The empirical evaluation of the determinants for
environmental technological change: a analysis agenda. Ecol. Econ. 68,
Delmas, M., 2001. Stakeholders and aggressive benefit: the case for ISO
14001. Prod. Oper. Manag. 10 (three), 343–358.
Delmas, M., Grant, L., 2014. Eco-labeling methods and price-premium: the
wine business puzzle. Bus. Soc. 53, 16–44.
Delmas, M., Pekovic, S., 2013. The engaged group: human capital, social
capital, inexperienced capital and labor productiveness. Harvard Enterprise College
Sustainability and Company Conferences.
Delmas, M., Hoffmann, V.H., Kuss, M., 2011. Below the tip of the iceberg:
absorptive capability, environmental technique, and aggressive benefit.
Bus. Soc. 50, 116–154.
Demirel, P., Kesidou, E., 2011. Stimulating various kinds of eco-innovation in
the UK: authorities insurance policies and agency motivations. Ecol. Econ. 70,
First, I., Khetriwal, D.S., 2010. Exploring the connection between environmental orientation and model worth: is there fireplace or solely smoke? Bus. Strateg.
Environ. 19, 90–103.
Florida, R., 1996. The transfer to environmentally acutely aware manufacturing. Calif.
Manag. Rev. 39, 80–105.
Florida, R., Davison, D., 2001. Gaining from inexperienced administration: Environmental
Administration Programs inside and out of doors the manufacturing unit. Calif. Manag. Rev. 43,
Fornell, C., Larcker, D.F., 1981. Evaluating structural equation fashions with
unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Mark. Res. 18, 39–50.
296 J. Amores-Salvadó et al. / Technological Forecasting & Social Change 96 (2015) 288–297
Frondel, M., Horbach, J., Rennings, Ok., 2008. What triggers environmental
administration and innovation? empirical proof from Germany. Ecol.
Econ. 66, 153–160.
González-Benito, J., González-Benito, O., 2008. Operations administration
practices linked to the adoption of ISO 14001: an empirical evaluation of
Spanish producers. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 113, 60–73.
González-Benito, J., Aguinis, H., Boyd, B., Suárez-González, I., 2012. Coming to
consensus on strategic consensus: a mediated moderation mannequin of
consensus and efficiency. J. Manag. 38, 1685–1714.
Hair, J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L., Black, W.C., 2004. Análisis Multivariante.
quinta edición. Pearson Prentice Corridor, Madrid.
Hart, S., 1995. A pure resource-based view of the agency. Acad. Manag. Rev. 20,
Hart, S., Ahuja, G., 1996. Does it pay to be inexperienced? An Empirical examination of
the connection between air pollution prevention and agency efficiency. Bus.
Strateg. Environ. 5, 30–37.
Horbach, J., 2008. Determinants of environmental innovation: new proof
from German panel knowledge sources. Res. Coverage 37, 163–173.
Horbach, J., Rammer, C., Rennings, Ok., 2012. Determinants of eco-innovations by
sort of environmental affect: the position of the regulatory push/pull,
know-how push and market pull. Ecol. Econ. 78, 112–122.
Iraldo, F., Testa, F., Frey, M., 2009. Is an environmental administration system ready
to affect environmental and aggressive efficiency? The case of the
eco-management and audit scheme (EMAS) within the European Union.
J. Clear. Prod. 17, 1444–1452.
Decide, W.Q., Douglas, T.J., 1998. Efficiency implications of incorporating
pure environmental points into the strategic planning course of; an
empirical evaluation. J. Manag. Stud. 35, 241-232.
Kammerer, D., 2009. The consequences of buyer profit and regulation on
environmental product innovation. Empirical proof from equipment
producers in Germany. Ecol. Econ. 68, 2285–2295.
Karagozoglu, N., Lindell, M., 2000. Environmental administration: testing the
win-win mannequin. J. Environ. Plan. Manag. 43, 817–829.
Khanna, M., Deltas, G., Ramírez, D., 2009. Adoption of air pollution prevention
strategies: the position of administration techniques and regulatory pressures.
Environ. Resour. Econ. 44, 85–106.
Könola, T., Unruh, G., 2007. Actually altering the course: the restrictions of
environmental administration techniques for innovation. Bus. Strateg. Environ.
Lannelongue, G., González-Benito, J., 2012. Opportunism and environmental
administration techniques: certification as a smokescreen for stakeholders.
Ecol. Econ. 82, 11–22.
Lee, J.J., Gemba, Ok., Kodama, F., 2006. Analyzing the innovation course of for
environmental efficiency enchancment. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang.
Hyperlink, S., Naveh, E., 2006. Standardization and discretion: does the environmental normal ISO 14001 result in efficiency advantages? IEEE Trans. Eng.
Manag. 53, 508–519.
López-Gamero, M., Molina-Azorín, J., Claver-Cortés, E., 2010. The potential of
environmental regulation to alter managerial notion, environmental
administration, competitiveness and monetary efficiency. J. Clear. Prod.
Melnyk, S., Sroufe, S., Calantone, R., 2003. Assessing the affect of environmental administration techniques on company and environmental efficiency.
J. Oper. Manag. 21, 329–351.
Menguc, B., Ozanne, L., 2005. Challenges to the inexperienced crucial: a pure
useful resource based mostly strategy to the environmental orientation-business
efficiency relationship. J. Bus. Res. 58, 430–438.
Menguc, B., Seigyoung, A., Ozanne, L., 2010. The interactive impact of inside and
exterior elements on a proactive environmental technique and its affect on
a agency's efficiency. J. Bus. Ethics 94, 279–298.
Menon, A., Menon, A., 1997. Enviropreneurial advertising technique: the emergence of company environmentalism as market technique. J. Mark. 61, 51–67.
Moors, E., Mulder, Ok., Vergragt, P., 2005. In the direction of cleaner manufacturing: limitations
and techniques within the base metals producing business. J. Clear. Prod. 13,
Muller, D., Yzerbyt, V., Judd, C., 2005. When moderation is mediated and
mediation is moderated. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 89, 852–863.
Nawrocka, D., Parker, T., 2009. Discovering the connection: environmental
administration techniques and environmental efficiency. J. Clear. Prod. 17,
Newbert, S., 2008. Worth, rareness, aggressive benefit and efficiency: a
conceptual-level empirical investigation of the resource-based view of the
agency. Strateg. Manag. J. 29, 745–768.
Rehfeld, Ok.M., Rennings, Ok., Ziegler, A., 2007. Built-in product coverage and
environmental product improvements: an empirical evaluation. Ecol. Econ. 61,
Rennings, Ok., Ziegler, A., Ankele, Ok., Hoffmann, E., 2006. The affect of
totally different traits of the eu environmental administration and auditing
scheme on technical environmental improvements and financial efficiency. Ecol. Econ. 57, 45–59.
Rugman, A., Berbeke, A., 1998. Company methods and environmental
laws: an organizing framework. Strateg. Manag. J. 19, 363–375.
Russo, M., 2009. Explaining the affect of ISO 14001 on emission efficiency:
a dynamic capabilities perspective on course of and studying. Bus. Strateg.
Environ. 18, 307–319.
Russo, M., Harrison, N., 2005. Organizational design and environmental
efficiency: Clues from the electronics business. Acad. Manag. J. 48,
Sroufe, R., 2003. Results of environmental administration techniques on environmental administration practices and operations. Prod. Oper. Manag. 12,
Triebswetter, U., Wackerbauer, J., 2008. Built-in environmental product
innovation within the area of Múnich and its affect on firm
competitiveness. J. Clear. Prod. 16, 1484–1493.
Venkatraman, M., Ramanukan, V., 1986. Measurement of enterprise efficiency
in technique analysis: a comparability of approaches. Acad. Manag. Rev. 11,
Wagner, M., 2007. On the connection between environmental administration,
environmental innovation and patenting: Proof from German
manufacturing corporations. Res. Coverage. 36, 1587–1602.
Wagner, M., 2008. Empirical affect of environmental administration on
innovation: proof from Europe. Ecol. Econ. 66, 392–402.
Wagner, M., 2009. Innovation and aggressive benefits from the combination
of strategic points with social and environmental administration in
European corporations. Bus. Strateg. Environ. 18, 291–306.
Wagner, M., 2010. The position of company sustainability efficiency for
financial efficiency: a firm-level evaluation of moderation results. Ecol.
Econ. 69, 1553–1560.
Wagner, M., Schaltegger, S., 2004. The impact of company environmental
technique selection and environmental efficiency on competitiveness and
financial efficiency: an empirical research of EU manufacturing. Eur.
Manag. J. 22, 557–572.
Wagner, M., Schaltegger, S., Wehremeyer, W., 2001. The connection between
the environmental and financial efficiency of corporations. Greener Manag.
Int. 34, 95–108.
Zenger, T.R., Lawrence, B.S., 1989. Organizational demography: the differential
results of age and tenure distributions on technical communication. Acad.
Manag. J. 32, 353–376.
Ziegler, A., Nogareda, J., 2009. Environmental administration techniques and
technological environmental improvements: exploring the causal relationship.
Res. Coverage 38, 885–893.
Javier Amores Salvadó, Ph.D., is Assistant Professor on the Enterprise
Administration Division in College Complutense de Madrid (Spain)
and member of its Technique, Data and Innovation Analysis Group (ECI).
He has been Analysis Fellow at UCLA College (Institute of the Setting
and Sustainability-Los Angeles, USA) (2013). His primary analysis areas are
innovation, environmental innovation and sustainable growth.
Gregorio Martín de Castro, Ph.D., is Affiliate Professor on the Enterprise
Administration Division in College Complutense de Madrid (Spain) and
member of its Technique, Data and Innovation Analysis Group (ECI). He
has been Analysis Fellow at Harvard College (2004–2005), on the College
of Manchester (2009), and on the College of Southern California, USA (2011).
He's writer and co-author of a number of books and articles regarding mental
capital and data administration.
Jose Emilio Navas López, Ph.D., is Professor on the Enterprise Administration
Division in College Complutense de Madrid (Spain) and Chairman of its
Technique, Data and Innovation Analysis Group (ECI). He's writer and
co-author of a number of books and articles regarding know-how administration,
technique, and data administration. He has held the primary Data
Administration Chair in Spain at I.U. Euroforum Escorial.
J. Amores-Salvadó et al. / Technological Forecasting & Social Change 96 (2015) 288–297 297 -research paper writing service