Assessment grading criteria essay
Evaluation grading standards 31/10/2019 Degree 5 Evaluation grading standards COURSEWORK 2019 15:58L5 CW 100-90% 89-80% 79-70% 69-60% 59-50% 49-40% 39-30% 29-20% 19-10% 9-Zero% Coherence, organisation of project and a focus to goal Robust logical organisation and coherence enhances fulfilment of the project aims and with some creativity. Robust logical organisation and coherence enhances fulfilment of the project aims. Demonstrates logical organisation and coherence. Demonstrates sound, considerate organisation. Demonstrates typically sound, typical organisation. Reveals passable organisation. Restricted organisation that's partially comprehensible. Poorly offered and structured. Very disorganised. Incoherent. 20% Readability of expression (incl. accuracy, spelling, grammar, punctuation). Wonderful writing model acceptable to the project. Grammar and spelling correct. Fluent writing model acceptable to the project. Grammar and spelling correct. Language fluent. Grammar and spelling correct. Language typically fluent. Grammar and spelling primarily correct. Which means clear, however language not at all times fluent. Grammar and/or spelling comprise errors. Usually comprehensible, however language accommodates errors which detract from the argument. Which means usually unclear and/or frequent errors in grammar and/or spelling. Which means unclear and/or frequent errors in grammar and/or spelling. Poor spelling, grammar and punctuation. Exceptionally poor spelling, grammar and punctuation. Educational integrity. Honesty in research; acknowledging and giving credit score to work of others; acceptable use of referencing requirements for self-discipline Sources used are acknowledged within the textual content and reference listing. Referencing is right and follows a systematic method acceptable to the self-discipline. All parts of particular person references are current. Sources used are acknowledged within the textual content and reference listing Referencing is right and acceptable to the self-discipline. All parts of particular person references are current. Sources used are acknowledged within the textual content and reference listing and used to help dialogue. Constant, error free utility of related referencing conventions with nice consideration to element. Sources used are acknowledged within the textual content and reference listing. Constant utility of related referencing conventions acceptable to the self-discipline with occasional inconsistencies. Makes an attempt to observe systematic method to the quotation of sources, acceptable to the self-discipline. Utility of related referencing conventions with minor inconsistencies. Some try to cite sources within the textual content however accommodates inaccuracies, inconsistencies and/or omissions. Usually right utility of related referencing conventions with some errors. Citations of sources within the textual content are inconsistent, inaccurate and/or incomplete. Restricted utility of referencing conventions and/or errors. Citations of sources within the textual content are inaccurate and/or incomplete. Entries within the reference listing are incomplete and/or absent. No acknowledgement of sources of knowledge in textual content and/or reference listing. No acknowledgement of sources of knowledge in textual content and/or reference listing. Consideration to goal / content material and vary of information and utilized to activity Addresses the aim of the project comprehensively and imaginatively. Demonstrates complete, detailed and in-depth information base, and a transparent understanding of the bounds to information. Addresses the aim of the project comprehensively. Demonstrates complete detailed and in-depth information base, with an understanding of the bounds to information. Addresses the complete goal of the project successfully. Demonstrates an in depth, coherent, in-depth, information base, with a growing appreciation of the provisional nature of information. Addresses the complete goal of the project successfully. Demonstrates a far-ranging, well-organised information base, and a few appreciation of the bounds of data. Demonstrates a sound factual and/or conceptual information base and makes use of acceptable terminology. Proof of ample information of subject and use of acceptable terminology. Some related and/or required information confused or vital misuse of terminology. Some related and/or required information lacking or confused and vital misuse of terminology. Fails to handle the project activity. Little or no related information included. Fails to handle the project activity. No related information included. 40% Use of literature / proof of studying Proof of unbiased studying. Clear, correct, systematic utility of high quality materials. Demonstrates a growing capability to critically appraise materials. Proof of unbiased studying from a balanced mixture of high quality major and a few secondary sources. Clear and correct utility of fabric. Proof of unbiased studying from high quality sources. Clear, correct, systematic utility of fabric. Proof of unbiased studying from good high quality sources. Literature appropriately utilized. Proof of some unbiased studying from acceptable sources and utility of literature. Proof of a slim vary of studying from acceptable sources. Literature is offered in a descriptive manner. Restricted proof of studying or inappropriate sources used and/or engagement with the literature very superficial. Very restricted proof of studying from acceptable sources. Little engagement with acceptable sources. No engagement with literature. Synthesis: Data gathering and processing Demonstrates a capability to remodel summary info, to assemble new concepts to satisfy the evaluation goal Data and ideas offered in an modern method to demonstate a full understanding of the topic. Proof of capability to utilise info processing ideas acceptable to the topic. Data is organised utilizing acceptable constructions and processes resulting in identification of ideas to meet evaluation goal. Collects, collates and categorises info in a structured method to meet evaluation goal Partially collects, collates and categorises info in an try to satisfy evaluation goal Data organisation lacks construction, hindering fulfilment of evaluation goal. Data organisation detracts from the evaluation goal. Restricted organisation of concepts / info No organisation of knowledge 40% Evaluation / Crucial reasoning Demonstrates a extremely developed vital analysis and evaluation of topic materials. Arguments are clear, coherent, credible and show originality. Demonstrates a transparent grasp of evaluation with well-developed, vital analysis of topic materials. Arguments are clear, coherent and show some originality. Makes efficient use of study to develop vital considering which is built-in into the work. Arguments show the power to judge topic materials. Evaluation demonstrates vital perception and a capability to distinction different positions close to principle. Makes truthful try at evaluation, demonstrating typical vital perception. Makes passable try at evaluation with restricted vital perception. Makes an attempt at evaluation with restricted proof of vital considering. Makes an attempt at evaluation ineffective. Incoherent vital considering. Lacks any evaluation. Insufficient proof of vital considering Lacks any evaluation. No proof of vital thought. Reflection / utility to apply / conclusion Crucial evaluation of private and others’ contributions and the rationale main to those. Demonstrates imaginative interested by potential options and implications for additional apply in a variety of contexts. Conclusions effectively developed and analytical. Critically analyses private contribution and that of others to apply. Considers limitations to growing acceptable plans of motion. Conclusions effectively developed, displaying vital perception with strategies of future actions. Analyses private contribution and that of others to apply by way of reflection. Considers affect of future actions. Conclusions effectively developed, displaying perception drawn from the physique of the work. Evaluates affect of private contribution and that of others to apply. Considers future actions. Conclusions developed logically in relation to content material. Capable of consider affect on apply and that of others utilizing numerous frames of reference. Identifies some additional actions. Sound conclusions clearly derived from content material. Capable of interpret affect on apply and that of others. Sufficient conclusions are drawn derived from content material Restricted interpretation of affect on apply. Some understanding of principle. Restricted conclusion drawn from content material. Ineffectual interpretation of affect on apply. Ineffective try to attract conclusion from the content material. Incomplete interpretation of apply implications. Restricted try to attract conclusion. Insufficient interpretation of apply implications. No conclusion. COHERENCE, ORGANISATION, ATTENTION TO ASSESSMENT PURPOSE AND ACADEMIC INTEGRITY CONTENT – KNOWLEDGE AND USE OF LITERATURE ANALYSIS, SYNTHESIS, CONCLUSION AND APPLICATION TO PRACTICE