8-4 Assignment: Reflection
ENG 123 Reflection Pointers and Rubric Put the argument right into a concrete form, into a picture, some arduous phrase, spherical and stable as a ball, which they'll see and deal with and carry house with them, and the trigger is half received. —Ralph Waldo Emerson Overview: On this evaluation, you'll write a mirrored image essay that explores the way you selected to include suggestions in your argument, your exploration of the problem, and your supply integration within the persuasive essay, in addition to how your incorporation of assets supported your declare. Moreover, you'll observe any challenges you confronted in incorporating assets and growing your argument all through the writing course of. Immediate: Beforehand, you recognized a difficulty in your present main, a serious you have an interest in pursuing, or your subject of labor. You then established an argument and supported that argument with analysis and related proof. On this project, you'll replicate on the way you selected to include suggestions regarding your argument, your exploration of the difficulty, and your integration of sources. Moreover, you'll observe any challenges you confronted in incorporating assets and growing your argument all through the writing course of. Particularly, the next important components should be addressed: I. Reflection A. What peer-review suggestions did you select to include regarding your argument and why? B. What challenges did you face in growing your argument? What might you've got performed in a different way? C. What peer-review suggestions did you select to include regarding your exploration of the difficulty and why? D. What peer-review suggestions did you select to include regarding your efficient supply integration and why? E. What writing methods had been only in supporting your argument, given your viewers, topic, and goal? Rubric Pointers for Submission: Your reflective essay should be 1–2 pages in size (plus a canopy web page if written in APA format) and written in MLA or APA format. Use double spacing, 12-point Occasions New Roman font, and one-inch margins. This evaluation shall be accomplished by the interactive exercise offered in your MindEdge eLearning supplies after which submitted by the educational surroundings. Crucial Parts Exemplary (100%) Proficient (85%) Wants Enchancment (55%) Not Evident (zero%) Worth Reflection: Argument Meets “Proficient” standards and shows cogent connections to particular components of essay Describes peer suggestions that was included into the argument within the last essay and justifies alternative Describes peer suggestions that was included into the argument within the last essay however doesn't justify alternative Doesn't describe peer suggestions that was included 10 Crucial Parts Exemplary (100%) Proficient (85%) Wants Enchancment (55%) Not Evident (zero%) Worth Reflection: Challenges Meets “Proficient” standards and demonstrates a nuanced understanding of the reflection course of Identifies challenges confronted whereas growing argument and describes what might have been performed in a different way Identifies challenges confronted whereas growing argument however does not describe what might have been performed in a different way Doesn't establish challenges confronted whereas growing argument 30 Reflection: Exploration of the Situation Meets “Proficient” standards and shows cogent connections to particular components of essay Describes peer suggestions that was included into the exploration of the difficulty within the last essay and justifies alternative Describes peer suggestions that was included into the exploration of the difficulty within the last essay however doesn't justify alternative Doesn't describe peer suggestions that was included 10 Reflection: Efficient Supply Integration Meets “Proficient” standards and shows cogent connections to particular components of essay Describes peer suggestions that was included into the efficient integration of sources within the last essay and justifies alternative Describes peer suggestions that was included into the efficient integration of sources within the last essay however doesn't justify alternative Doesn't describe peer suggestions that was included 10 Reflection: Writing Methods Meets “Proficient” standards, and description is exceptionally clear and contextualized Describes the writing methods regarded as only in supporting the argument, given viewers, topic, and goal Describes the writing methods felt to be only in supporting argument, given viewers, topic, and goal, however description lacks element Doesn't describe the writing methods 30 Articulation of Response Submission is freed from errors associated to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, and group and is offered in knowledgeable and easy-to-read format Submission has no main errors associated to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or group Submission has main errors associated to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or group that negatively affect readability and articulation of principal concepts Submission has important errors associated to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or group that forestall understanding of concepts 10 Complete 100% -research paper writing service