Educational Leadership Addressing Early Childhood Needs
Early Childhood Management Excellence
Working in the field of early childhood education demands a multifaceted skill set from education professionals. These individuals need to evolve into adept leaders, efficient managers, adept negotiators, respected chairpersons, and creative educators. Their task is to provide meticulously designed and skillfully implemented services. The efficacy of educational leadership is influenced not only by legal considerations and disparities but also by personal relationships. An understanding of emotions, needs, goals, and abilities significantly impacts leadership effectiveness. It is evident that comprehensive pre-training and professional education are imperative for education leaders (Mitgang, 2012).
However, effective leadership requires patience, support, organization, and adaptability, depending on the context. In the realm of educational leadership, theory and practice are symbiotic. Leaders must grasp how theory can be operationalized in practice and how practice, in turn, influences theory. The current challenges within early childhood education management and leadership underscore the necessity of scrutinizing the quality of leadership, its determinants, and the triumphs and obstacles that shape our comprehension of effective early education management.
Essential Traits of an Effective Leader
In an interview with an early childhood manager, the setting was described as a “sports and exercise centered playscheme for children aged 4-12 years, based in a sports center” (Anonymous, 2017, pers. comm., n.d.). The interviewee, the managing director, highlighted the significance of effective communication, patience, punctuality, and organization for successful leadership (Anonymous, 2017, pers. comm., n.d.).
Rodd (2012) asserts that leadership varies based on personality, values, visions, beliefs, skills, and experience. While the interviewee did not specify whether their perspective on successful leadership was rooted in practice or theory, it can be assumed that experience played a pivotal role in determining essential leadership traits.
Credible leaders are often characterized as honest, inspiring, competent, forward-looking, fair, motivational, responsible, and reliable (Rodd, 2012). The interviewee emphasized the importance of being supportive and understanding with a “firm but fair approach” (Anonymous, 2017, pers. comm., n.d.). Notably, this aligns with academic literature on leadership traits.
However, a scholarly debate exists regarding the appropriate approach to early education management: “more distant professional behavior [or] more affectionate, nurturing behavior” (Fuller, 2008, p. 218). The latter approach, though fostering warmth, can also contribute to formality and institutionalization. The interviewee strikes a balance between the two, stressing the need to be simultaneously friendly and professional, combining roles as a teacher, enforcer, and trainer (Anonymous, 2017, pers. comm., n.d.).
An additional perspective is love-based leadership, emphasizing love, tenderness, and care as integral components of early childhood education (Uusiautti & Määttä, 2013). This approach is based on attributes like mindfulness, benevolence, perseverance, and sound judgment. While the interviewee prioritizes professionalism with a supportive approach, Uusiautti and Määttä’s (2013) approach advocates emotional engagement for better understanding.
Balancing Leadership and Management
The interviewee, when queried about their role as a leader or manager, viewed these roles as intertwined, with managers carrying more administrative responsibilities like board meetings (Anonymous, 2017, pers. comm., n.d.). While research emphasizes leadership’s primacy over administration (Heikka, Waniganayake, & Hujala, 2012), merging these roles might hinder effective performance.
Effective leadership extends beyond cognitive and interpersonal skills; administrative aptitude is crucial. Multiple leadership strategies exist, such as transformational and visionary leadership, but they might not suit a knowledge-oriented economy (Aubrey, Godfrey, & Harris, 2012). The proposed solution is distributed early childhood leadership, where domain experts collaborate within a decentralized structure (Aubrey, Godfrey, & Harris, 2012). The interviewee, while managing alone, transitions between leadership and management as needed, leveraging their experience for a unified approach.
Manager-Staff Relationships and Challenges
A positive relationship between leaders and staff is vital for organizational efficiency and student performance (Mendels, 2012). The interviewee values team meetings and bonding sessions, nurturing an environment of effective communication (Anonymous, 2017, pers. comm., n.d.). Researchers advocate for a collaborative work environment, where employees can express concerns and ideas openly (Bhatti et al., 2012).
Effective leaders embrace social justice, inclusivity, and cultural shifts (Capper & Young, 2012; Florian, 2013). Addressing injustices, inappropriate behavior, and diversity-related issues is imperative (Santamaría & Santamaría, 2013). Though not discussed in the interview, the interviewee’s emphasis on staff responsibility aligns with addressing barriers in child safety.
Policies and Early Education
Educational leaders must navigate policy regulations and legislation. Safety concerns, EYFS, child protection, safeguarding, and risk assessments influence setting construction (Anonymous, 2017, pers. comm., n.d.). Complying with guidelines specific to diverse age groups is essential for child safety (Robertson, 2015). The Early Years Foundation Stage (EYFS) framework requires leaders to ensure child well-being, health, and behavior management (Department of Education, 2017).
Early education leadership and management encompass diverse factors. Effective leaders prioritize staff collaboration, child safety, legal adherence, and policy comprehension. They foster a culture of education, positivity, and leadership while balancing administrative tasks and direct interaction with children. Ultimately, successful early childhood managers bridge theory and practice, adapting their approach to ensure children’s well-being and development.
“The Impact of Response to Intervention on the Educational Outcomes of Children with Learning Disabilities.” By Jessica L. Higgins, Emily S. Baker, and Jennifer A. Rinaldi. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 53(4), 341-352. doi:10.1177/0022219420917040
“Using Response to Intervention to Support Children with Learning Disabilities in Early Childhood Education.” By Amanda S. Buttner, Marcus Hasselhorn, and Ulrike Buettner. Early Childhood Education Journal, 48(6), 625-634. doi:10.1007/s10643-020-00987-9
“The Effectiveness of Response to Intervention in Early Childhood Education: A Meta-Analysis.” By Rachel E. Gartland and Ashley M. Strosnider. Journal of Educational Psychology, 115(3), 665-682. doi:10.1037/edu0000495