Custom Writing Help For You!

Special Discounts Offers! 20-30% Off!

Posted: January 31st, 2023

Expropriation in International Law

You should prepare a report on Expropriation in International Law.
Expropriation in International Law
The taking of foreign property by a state for any reason is known as expropriation (Baetens, 2017). In the past, the activity entailed the outright taking of property, but it has evolved to include the indirect governmental measures that cause a similar effect as the formal taking of a property. The property also includes intangible property, which are the rights that arise from a contract which are susceptible to expropriation in a similar manner as tangible property (Schreuer, 2005). In the definitions of investments in the treaties focused on investments’ protection.
From the 19th century, International law has been protecting foreigners from their properties being taken. The aftermath of World War II would create a way for customary International law as it brought in changes such as the development of minimum standards to take a foreign property lawfully (Baetens, 2017). The measures included that the expropriation should occur for a public reason, done in a non-discriminatory manner, follows the due process of the law, and accompanied with adequate compensation. Currently, the International Investment Agreements (IIAS) regulate this right to take foreign property (Baetens, 2017). Apart from the aforementioned minimal standards, it also lays out further rules on the property types protected, requirements for protection, and actions to be taken for a particular property to be protected.
Over time direct and overt expropriations have reduced in number with the typical form currently being the indirect expropriations or measures with similar effects (Henckels, 2012). The transfer in direct expropriation will benefit the state or the mandated third party state. Conversely, indirect expropriations entail the total or the nearly-total deprivation of investments with no formal transfers of title or outright seizure (Heckels, 2012). While the concept of indirect expropriations has been known for some time and was reflected in investments’ protection, it became well established in International Judicial practice much later. Indirect expropriation has several subcategories, such as de facto, creeping, constructive, disguised, or virtual expropriation (UNCTAD, 2012). The most common subcategory is the creeping expropriation that entails a simultaneous series of actions leading to property deprivation or loss of control. The set of state actions are taken within a limited period then considered constituent parts of a unified treatment to the investor or investment. Its counterpart is in the State law, whose function in the breach concept includes a composite act (UNCTAD, 2012).
In international law, not every breach of contract by a state will lead to economic loss for the investor will be considered an expropriation (Schreuer, 2005). The distinguishing criterion followed between a simple breach, and the expropriation factor is whether the actions by the state were under their commercial functions as a party to the agreement or they acted in their sovereign capacity. Just because a legitimate public purpose underlying a regulatory measure was present in the transfer of property, the existence of expropriation is not excluded. The distinction made here between the regulatory expropriation needing compensation and regular regulatory action is dependent on the scope, gravity, and time taken by the deprivation (Schreuer, 2005). In this case, the intended purpose of the government in the expropriation is not considered.
It is, however, essential to note that the IIAS has been facing the question of differentiating the compensable indirect expropriations and the legitimate non-compensable regulatory measures (Baetens, 2017). Its tribunals have not come up with guiding principles to quantify compensation and the steps to be followed in the valuation of expropriated property.

References
Baetens, F. (2017). Expropriation in International Investment Law. Oxford Bibliographies. Retrieved from https://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo-9780199796953/obo-9780199796953-0159.xml
Henckels, C. (2012). Indirect expropriation and the right to regulate: revisiting proportionality analysis and the standard of review in investor-state arbitration. Journal of International Economic Law, 15(1), 223-255.
Schreuer, C. (2005). The Concept of Expropriation under the ETC and other Investment Protection Treaties. Retrieved from https://www.univie.ac.at/intlaw/pdf/csunpublpaper_3.pdf
UNCTAD. (2012). Expropriation. UNCTAD Series on Issues in International Investment Agreements. New York and Geneva: UN. Retrieved from https://unctad.org/en/Docs/unctaddiaeia2011d7_en.pdf

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Order for this Paper or similar Answer/Assignment Writing Service

Place your order by filling a guided instructions form in 3 easy steps.

Why choose our Study Bay Services?

Like every student, Focusing on achieving the best grades is our main goal

Top Essay Writers

We have carefully cultivated a team of exceptional academic writers, each with specialized expertise in particular subject areas and a proven track record of research writing excellence. Our writers undergo rigorous screening and evaluation to ensure they hold relevant advanced degrees and demonstrate mastery of English grammar, citation style, and research methodology. Recent projects completed by our writers include research papers on topics such as sustainable energy policy, cognitive behavioral therapy, and molecular genetics.

Student-Based Prices

We prioritize attracting highly skilled writers through competitive pay and strive to offer the most cost-effective services for students. References from recent years include surveys of customer satisfaction with online writing services conducted by the American Customer Satisfaction Index between 2018 to 2022, demonstrating our commitment to balancing affordable costs with high standards of work through positive reviews and retention of expert writers.

100% Plagiarism-Free

We guarantee 100% original and plagiarism-free final work through a thorough scanning of every draft copy using advanced plagiarism detection software before release, ensuring authentic and high-quality content for our valued customers. To note, we also do not generate assignment content with AI tool, thus you a guaranteed 0% similarity index for your final research paper.

How it works

When you decide to place an order with Study Pro Essay, here is what happens:

Complete the Order Form

You will complete our order form, filling in all of the fields and giving us as much detail as possible.

Assignment of Writer

We analyze your order and match it with a writer who has the unique qualifications to complete it, and he begins from scratch.

Order in Production and Delivered

You and,the support and your writer communicate directly during the process, and, once you receive the final draft, you either approve it or ask for revisions.

Giving us Feedback (and other options)

We want to know how your experience went. You can read other clients’ testimonials too. And among many options, you can choose a favorite writer.