ASK 1: Sexism (7 factors whole)
Please full Glick & Fiske’s (1996) “Ambivalent Sexism Stock” (ASI) at: http://www.understandingprejudice.org/asi/
This could take not more than 10 minutes so you will not have to take a position an excessive amount of time. After you full the ASI, you can be given TWO scores, one on your stage of hostile sexism and one on your stage of benevolent sexism. Additionally, you will be capable of examine your scores to others who took the survey on-line in addition to some responses damaged down by nation.
For this job, you can be contemplating the scores themselves and likewise the ideas.
1. Analyze and talk about your hostile and benevolent sexism SCORES (2.5pts).
(Observe: If you’re uncomfortable offering your precise scores within the public discussion board, please do not. Nevertheless, it is best to ship me the scores by way of IM or e-mail so I do know you probably did full the task and get credit score). For the submit, it’s essential to talk about and analyze your scores by comparability – examine your scores to the common of at the very least two different classes; to males/females; different international locations — you choose who or what you discover attention-grabbing to check to however extra importantly, present explanation why you selected these classes and what you anticipated to search out in your comparability (with causes based mostly in psychological ideas). Different points to contemplate: What did you consider the objects within the survey? Clarify what you concentrate on the scores .. correct? What else crossed your thoughts?
2. Analyze and talk about the CONCEPTS of hostile and benevolent sexism (four.5pts).
Some questions I got here up with so that you can think about (however keep in mind, definitely add extra of your personal ideas right here): Do you suppose “ambivalent” sexism is smart? How do you suppose the 2 sorts are associated? What’s the relevance and implications of those? How would possibly we cut back every one? I am positive there are a lot of different concepts that come to your thoughts so please discover them on this commentary.
As a part of this job, discover one article from a Psychology Journal (ideally one which has the phrases “Social” together with “Psychology” within the title of the journal) that explored the ASI (and please, don’t use the unique Glick and Fiske work or different work they did following up on the size for this requirement — in fact you’ll be able to embody their work for different elements of the dialogue if you would like). Present a quick paragraph summarizing the article (once more, that entails writing concerning the speculation, briefly what they did and what they discovered — all in your personal phrases) and ensure to incorporate the right APA quotation for the supply (this abstract of the article will probably be price 1.5 out of the four.5 factors).
Hope you take pleasure in. Needless to say not all of you’ll agree with one another and that’s simply FINE; simply be sure that together with opinion, you think about the social psychological rules at play and evidently, are respectful in your responses to one another!
TASK 2: Racism (5 factors)
For this job, please watch the next excerpt offered by Frontline on Youtube taken from Jane Elliott’s traditional experiment titled “A Class Divided”. For this task, you solely want to look at about 27 minutes of it (53 minutes whole; all of it is extremely attention-grabbing so I encourage you to look at as a lot of it as you’ll be able to). Please understand that this was executed in a distinct historic time so clearly, comprises references and procedures that almost certainly wouldn’t be allowed right now. FYI, there are a lot of different reenactments of this (for instance, The Oprah Winfrey Present did one).
Your job for this dialogue is to offer a social psychological commentary of varied issues that occurred within the quick examine. It is best to think about including a bit of of your private opinion and software to your personal experiences and people of others to make this commentary distinctive to you. Nevertheless, the massive a part of this commentary is to use and analyze varied social psychological ideas/theories/analysis findings from the chapter as utilized to numerous particulars of this examine.
As all the time, even when a few of this materials is disturbing or very private, I hope you take pleasure in this methodology of studying. It’d assist a few of you who had been disturbed by the methodoloy and the youngsters as individuals to know that Ms. Elliot adopted up together with her unique college students once they had been adults they usually indicated that they had been grateful and realized rather a lot from the expertise (as you’ll be able to see within the latter a part of the video).
QUESTION 1: Sexism (7 factors whole)
Please fill out Glick and Fiske’s (1996) “Ambivalent Sexism Stock” (ASI) at http://www.understandingprejudice.org/asi/.
This could take not more than 10 minutes, so you will not must put in an excessive amount of effort. After finishing the ASI, you can be assigned TWO scores: one on your stage of hostile sexism and one on your stage of benevolent sexism. Additionally, you will be capable of examine your outcomes to these of different individuals who accomplished the ballot on-line, in addition to some responses break up down by nation.
You can be contemplating each the scores and the ideas for this train.
1. Study and clarify your indignant and benign sexism SCORES (2.5pts).
(Please don’t present your precise scores within the public discussion board for those who really feel uncomfortable doing so.)