RES 800 Business Research
Topic Title Enterprise Analysis Topic Code RES 800 Lecturer / Tutor Dr Chengeto Chaderopa & Dr Andrew Le Semester Might 2021 Evaluation Title Enterprise Analysis Proposal Studying End result/s • Analyse moral points and issues and their relevance in utilized enterprise analysis. • Apply analysis theories and methodologies to help in growing a enterprise analysis proposal. • Succinctly talk arguments that mirror a synthesis of literature and enterprise analysis ideas. • Utilise vital considering to analyse managerial issues and formulate related analysis questions and analysis design. • Apply superior understanding and expertise in qualitative and quantitative knowledge assortment, evaluation and interpretation. Evaluation sort (group or particular person) Particular person Weighting 50% Phrase rely 3000 phrases Due date Week 11 Class submission Lecture ? Tutorial ? Submission sort Paper copy ? Turnitin ? Format / Structure of Evaluation (particulars of what to incorporate) (cross the suitable examine containers) Report: ICMS Cowl Web page Desk of Contents Synopsis / Government Abstract Introduction Findings Conclusion Suggestions Reference Record Appendices ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Essay: ICMS Cowl Web page Summary Introduction Physique Conclusion Suggestions Reference Record Appendices ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Oral Presentation: Paper submission PowerPoint submission Peer assessment (group presentation) Reference Record ? ? ? ? Different: (define particular particulars right here – use examine containers) Evaluation directions (clear, succinct, with out repetition) On this task, college students have to: • Submit a 3000-word Enterprise Analysis Proposal which incorporates their analysis goal, questions, literature assessment, analysis strategies (pattern, sampling, instrumentation, knowledge assortment and evaluation), and the proposed timeline. • The Enterprise Analysis Proposal must exhibit college students' superior understanding of analysis theories and methodologies and their synthesis of the literature within the discipline to develop unique contributions and counsel particular suggestions for enchancment. Please take note of notes beneath: • Reviews are to be submitted to Turnitin at week 11 • You may be anticipated to have consulted books, at the very least 15 related latest educational journal articles, convention proceedings, theses, dissertations, market studies and so forth to organize the report from high quality sources listed in scholarly databases • Use correct in-text citations and referencing • Don't plagiarize • For type you should use observe rigorously the type information doc on the Moodle. Readings for the evaluation (directions the place they are often discovered e.g. MyAthens database, Moodle and so on.) • Lecture notes (Moodle) • Beneficial textbooks within the unit define • Prescribed articles accessible on MyAthens database Grading Standards / Rubric The next standards shall be used to evaluate this task: • Construction of the essay, clear headings and sub headings. • Readability, consistency and conceptual accuracy of arguments within the literature assessment and downside assertion. • Clear and simple to grasp explanations for knowledge assortment and evaluation. • Correct and well-argued justifications for the selection of sampling strategies and analytical method consistent with analysis downside and questions. • Logical circulate for the literature assessment. • Full and correct in-text quotation and referencing. Peer Evaluate Analysis (group work – non-compulsory) N/A Evaluation three - Enterprise Analysis Proposal (50%) Standards Description Weight Poor 50% Weak 65% Common 75% Good 75% Glorious 85% Readability of arguments How clear arguments are made concerning the software of analysis strategies and methods Max. 5 marks Coherency of argument Are analytic arguments about selection of strategies and design coherent and aligned with the RO and RQs? Max. 5 marks Consistency Are analytic arguments about selection of strategies and design constant? Max. 5 marks Construction Is essay professionally structured when it comes to headings, sub headings and paragraphing Max. 5 marks Pattern and sampling Are the selection of sampling technique and pattern dimension adequately and accurately mentioned? Max. 10 marks Analytical strategies Are the selection of analytical technique and method adequately and accurately mentioned? Max. 10 marks High quality of references used Are all references used peer reviewed? Max. 5 marks Citations and referencing codecs Are in-text citations and referenced formatted based on the prescribed types and codecs? Max. 5 marks
ASSESSMENT 3 – Case Study, Policy development & Observation
ASSESSMENT three – Case Research, Coverage growth & Statement Goal: That is for use for assessing college students through the strategy of State of affairs based mostly questions. Unit Code : SITXCCS008 Unit identify: Develop and Handle high quality customer support Parts assessed : 1.1,1.2,1.three,1.four,1.5,2.12.three,2.four,2.5,2.6,three.1,three.2,three.three,three.four,three.5,three.6 Lecturer/Coach : Neil D Rungassamy Scholar Title : Scholar No : Date Due : Date Obtained : INSTRUCTION: ? Evaluation is in two elements. Every activity have to be accomplished to be deemed passable on this evaluation. PART A Case Research Mr and Mrs Jones had been trying ahead to celebrating their fifth marriage ceremony anniversary in type and had nice plans for his or her particular night. Mr Jones determined to ebook a desk for 2 for dinner on the not too long ago refurbished “Cape Lighthouse”, a restaurant with commanding views over the Coral Sea. To make sure a pleasant desk with views for this event, Mr Jones had contacted the restaurant 2 months previous to make a reservation with a male workers member who gave the impression to be very skilled. The reserving was then confirmed by phone with Alex, a waitress, 1 week previous to the booked date. On their anniversary Mr and Mrs Jones arrived on the restaurant; nevertheless they discovered there was no reserving of their identify. Workers had been unable to find any reserving info. Mr Jones was requested whom he had spoken to, to make the reservation and offered the main points of workers; nevertheless this was someway shrugged off and so they had been requested to attend on the entry to “see whether or not a desk may very well be organized”. Because it was a Friday evening the restaurant was very busy. Mr and Mrs Jones needed to wait 15 minutes earlier than they lastly had been led to a small desk the again of the restaurant close to the kitchen doorways. After an additional 15 minutes they had been attended to by a drink waiter who took their order for an aperitif. The Joneses positioned their meals and wine order and their entrees arrived after 30 minutes. The white wine to go together with the entrees didn't arrive and the drinks waiter appeared to disregard their eye contact. The primary course for Mr Jones arrived inside 5 minutes after the entrees had been cleared, nevertheless Mrs Jones’ meal didn't arrive for an additional 20 minutes. Mrs Jones was very upset with the service and was virtually on the verge of leaving. When Mr and Mrs Jones went to pay the cheque on their method out, Mrs Jones was anticipating an apology from the restaurant workers with reference to their reserving and the delay within the service, sadly nobody was round even to speak about it. Mr and Mrs Jones determined that this was the final go to ever at this institution. They positively would inform their household and associates about their eating expertise at “Cape Lighthouse”. Your activity: Handle every of the next questions regarding the case examine. 1. Determine Mr and Mrs Jones’ buyer wants and expectations on this case examine. What would a buyer count on not solely on an necessary event just like the talked about anniversary however on every event when visiting an institution? Response 2. What may very well be the possible results of this incident for the enterprise and customized down the observe if the customer support points usually are not addressed? Response three. You're the Common Supervisor of the Cape Lighthouse and the expertise of Mr and Mrs Jones has come to your consideration. You might be decided to make contact with the client to try to resolve the difficulty and obtain a optimistic final result. Draft a letter which clearly outlines the steps you'll undertake to contact Mr and Mrs Jones and the way you'll attempt to resolve the problems. (This may very well be used as steerage for a phone dialog for contact). Response four. Contemplating Mr and Mrs Jones’ latest expertise, it is very important assess if there are recurring points with customer support on the Cape Lighthouse. How will you identify if it is a one-off concern or if there are persistent issues? Define your strategy. Response PART B 1 You might be required to develop a coverage and procedures for every of the next downside areas which had been evident: a. Bookings b. Workers Presentation c. Greeting / Internet hosting d. Buyer Service Procedures for Service (Orders, timelines, attendance) e. Coping with complaints Every coverage wants to incorporate: o The coverage identify o The goal or goal o The small print of what's included o The procedures included to realize the aim o What are the necessities to coach workers to have the ability to carry out the procedures? o How will this coverage and its effectiveness be monitored and evaluated? o To whom will this coverage be made accessible? How? 2 Observations You may be noticed over 4 service intervals, the way you: A. Implement developed insurance policies and procedures B. Talk necessities with workers C. Monitor service provisions and handle these effectively D. Consider every service occasion and incorporate suggestions into the subsequent occasion. You might be required to put in writing a quick abstract for every service occasion, clearly outlining: 1. What labored effectively 2. What wants enchancment three. How you might have evaluated every coverage you might have applied four. How was workers concerned for the aim of analysis 5. How you'll implement every recognized change required into the next service occasion. Present every abstract to your coach prior to every service occasion. Your implementation of procedures and necessities you might have recognized in every occasion can be a part of the evaluation of your efficiency. Particulars of the character of the most important duties for every service interval must be offered within the desk under. Occasion Date Length from ... to... Duties to be accomplished What can be noticed? Analysis abstract accomplished Service Interval e.g Breakfast 08/01/19 Particulars: 7am-8am Insurance policies and procedures applied and adopted: Workers presentation coverage 1.zero Are the staffs representing a optimistic picture of the restaurant 2.zero Are they neat and professional with look? Service Interval 1: Particulars: Insurance policies and procedures applied and adopted: Service Interval 2: Particulars: Insurance policies and procedures applied and adopted: Service Interval three: Particulars: Insurance policies and procedures applied and adopted: Service Interval four: Particulars: Insurance policies and procedures applied and adopted: three Function-play : Buyer dispute You're a restaurant supervisor in Quinlan restaurant. Your fundamental duties are managing the wait workers and front-of-house workers and guaranteeing buyer satisfaction. Organisational procedures for dealing with buyer complaints are as follows. • Step 1: Apologise to the client and establish what the issue is. • Step 2: Attempt to resolve the client’s downside by rectifying their concern. Service workers have the authority to supply the next. • Modify orders to include buyer requests inside cause (i.e., not requiring undue time and expense). • Change meals or drinks to the worth of $100. • Supply different meals or drinks to the worth of $50 greater than the unique order. • Step three: If unable to efficiently resolve a buyer’s downside, inform the supervisor or supervisor. Present particulars of all the problems and provides made to the client when making an attempt to resolve the difficulty. • Step four: Supervisor/supervisor can resolve the criticism and is ready to present free meals, drinks, vouchers or lodge credit and a proper written apology. • Step 5: If the difficulty continues to be unresolved with the client, then the merchandise is escalated to the lodge supervisor or an exterior physique. There are three contributors on this role-play: 1. The restaurant supervisor 2. The top waiter three. The client. Simulated surroundings assets • Desk to simulate entrance desk/counter • Invoice Job 1: Conduct role-play Learner directions It's lunchtime and you might be speaking with the cooks within the kitchen whenever you hear a loud indignant voice on the entrance desk. It seems like an irate buyer. You then hear your head waiter additionally elevating their voice. You rapidly get to the entrance desk to attempt to resolve the difficulty. • Throughout this role-play, you might be required to display the next abilities and data. • Use questioning and listening strategies to find out the client’s wants or considerations. • Use clear communication with the workers member. • Take duty for service outcomes and dispute decision. • Recognise and resolve buyer issues or delays and deficiencies in customer support. • Full the role-play. Job 2: Query and reply Q1: How would you assess the effectiveness of the customer support offered by the pinnacle waiter? Q2: Was the dispute decision course of offered by the pinnacle waiter efficient? Why/why not? Q3: What modifications would you make to customer support and dispute decision procedures on account of this incident? This fall: How do you act as a optimistic function mannequin for skilled requirements anticipated of hospitality business personnel? Function-play : Buyer dispute Did the learner efficiently display proof of their capability to do the next? Assessor feedback Accomplished Sure No Scholar Title; The learner recognised and resolved the client’s downside. Recognised that it was the pinnacle waiter’s error and that there was a double entry of the principle on the invoice. Rectified the issue to the client’s satisfaction according to personal degree of duty. Took duty for service outcomes and dispute decision. Corrected the pinnacle waiter and requested them to apologise to the client. Acted as a optimistic function mannequin for skilled requirements anticipated of hospitality workers. Gained suggestions from the client on learn how to enhance customer support practices. Trainers Notes
Assessment 2- Report: Macroeconomics – ECON6000 Word limit: 2500 words
Evaluation 2- Report: Macroeconomics – ECON6000 Phrase restrict: 2500 phrases Date due: 08th August 2021 (Sunday), 11:55pm AEST Weighting: 40% Enterprise report pointers • Protecting web page – make sure you embrace your title, Scholar ID and phrase rely. • Government abstract. • Desk of Contents (use the Phrase mechanically generated desk of contents). • Physique of report with solutions to every of your questions, together with headings for every query and a part of query. • References: once you use one other individual’s wording or one other individual’s concept it is advisable to embrace an in-text or embedded reference after which embrace the complete reference within the Reference Listing. Consult with the library’s on-line referencing information: https://library.torrens.edu.au/academicskills/apa/device • Be certain that your report accommodates a minimal of six educational references (customary web sites are accepted; blogs usually are not for use to help your reply). • Use APA seventh version reference model; test TUA library web site for APA seventh version. • Use a minimal 11 level font. • Use web page numbers. • Appendices (provided that required). The weighting on the marks are evenly distributed, however we mark in keeping with the rubric, which is: • Efficient rationalization of the ideas coated to reveal understanding and data of the core areas of Macroeconomics (30%) • Software of core ideas (25%) • High quality of the solutions (20%) • Managing Time (25%) Desk of Contents Make sure you use the Phrase automated desk of contents with model guides. Information to developing a Desk of Contents: https://studying.linkedin.com/weblog/designtips/the-wicked-easy-way-to-create-a-table-of-contents-in-word Information to utilizing heading kinds: https://help.workplace.com/en-us/article/add-a-heading3eb8b917-56dc-4a17-891a-a026b2c790f2 Web page numbers Web page numbering begins after the desk of contents (i.e. web page 1 will comprise your first reply). You shouldn't have a web page quantity in your masking web page. Your desk of contents web page ought to have the roman numeral “i”. Information to web page numbering: https://help.workplace.com/en-us/article/Begin-page-numberinglater-in-your-document-c73e3d55-d722-4bd0-886e-0b0bd0eb3f02 The Federal Price range 2021 has the next to supply: 1) An additional A$7.eight billion in tax cuts for low and center revenue earners, the place people would obtain A$1080 roughly, and will obtain A$2160 roughly 2) Private tax cuts that may circulation to the households can be price A$25.1 billion Three) Authorities is planning to speculate roughly A$1.2billion in aviation and tourism bundle Supply: https://7news.com.au/politics/federal-budget-202122-at-a-glance-c- 2814653?utm_campaign=shareicons&utm_source=electronic mail&utm_medium=electronic mail&tid=162081 0635944 You're a reputed Enterprise Economist working for a reputed organisation. You're required to analyse the next points and submit your report: 1) Do you assume that the federal government expenditure and tax cuts can be enough to assist revive the tourism sector and aviation within the course of? With many individuals working from house and with worldwide borders remaining closed, stress ranges are on the rise for a lot of who're unable to journey. Given the present circumstance of border restrictions within the nation, do you imagine that home tourism will choose up? How does it have an effect on the macro economic system when it comes to Mixture Demand (AD) and Mixture Provide (AS)? Clarify your views clearly with acceptable diagrams to help your reply. 2) The Reserve Financial institution of Australia (RBA) is eager on lowering the unemployment to four.5%; RBA would additionally wish to see a rise in inflation to 2-Three% from the present 1.1% How do you recommend we might revive the macro economic system given the repercussion from border restrictions and lockdowns in each state? Use current information to help your reply; your information can't be over 5 years outdated. Three) Do you assume that a additional A$1.9 billion funding in vaccine rollout would assist save the tourism sector? If states impose powerful entry legal guidelines, how do you recommend that home tourism might revive given that also they are hotspots for tourism business? Additional, what are your views on retaining borders closed – is it boon or a bane to the tourism and aviation business in Australia on condition that tourism constitutes an excellent a part of injection into the round circulation? Use any current information to help your reply. Your information can't be over 5 years outdated. §§§§§§§
CMM81002 Diabetes Self-management Education Theory and Practice 2020
CMM81002 Diabetes Self-management Schooling Concept and Observe 2020 Evaluation 2: Diabetes group schooling session - Plan Evaluation 2, Three and four of this unit are interrelated and contain the event of a diabetes group schooling session. The diabetes group schooling session you create can be a 5 minute video which you'll document utilizing Screencast-O-Matic. The three-interrelated assessments of this unit embody the next: Evaluation 2 – Diabetes group schooling session - Plan Evaluation Three – Diabetes group schooling session – Video recording Evaluation four – Diabetes group schooling session - Reflection Evaluation 2 requires you to plan a diabetes group schooling session and write a scientific proof primarily based report which outlines your plan. Your group schooling session should tackle an issue or problem that's related to one of many ADEA seven self-care behaviours. You might be required to analyse the problem that's related to the self-care behaviour inside the context of a determinants of well being mannequin. Your schooling session should embody inventive components and studying methods which might be acceptable in your audience. Your report must also embody an analysis plan which describes the strategies you could possibly use to judge the effectiveness of your session. Word: The aim of this evaluation is to develop a gaggle diabetes schooling session that might be delivered to people who find themselves residing with diabetes. Please don't develop a presentation to ship to individuals who look after folks with diabetes. Comply with the 4 steps beneath to plan your diabetes schooling session: Step 1. Establish your matter Choose one of many ADEA seven self-care behaviours and contemplate why this behaviour could also be troublesome for somebody with diabetes to comply with. Analyse the problems you establish inside the context of a determinants of well being mannequin. What are the underlying causes of the problems? Can your diabetes schooling session enhance private expertise and impression in a roundabout way on the underlying determinants? What's the objective of your diabetes schooling session? Guarantee your matter is restricted and will be coated in a 5 minute session. The subject of your schooling session wants to deal with one of many underlying causes of the problems. Step 2. Establish your goal group Contemplate who your audience can be. What are the wants and expectations of the group? What are their values, attitudes and beliefs? What are their studying preferences? Contemplate why the subject is of relevance to the goal group. Use scientific proof to assist and justify the goal group you've got chosen. Outline your audience by describing the important thing traits of your group together with: gender, age, ethnicity and cultural traits, and sort of diabetes. Step Three. Purpose, goals and lesson plan What's the overarching purpose of your diabetes schooling session? What are the precise goals that you simply wish to obtain from the session? What info will you embody within the schooling session? How will you make the schooling session acceptable to the wants of your audience? Contemplate how well being behaviour idea has influenced your session growth? Your lesson plan wants to incorporate sufficient element so that a colleague might choose up your plan and do the presentation for you. Contemplate the training methods finest suited to the goals, goal group and on-line surroundings. What sources do you want to run the session? The overarching purpose of the diabetes schooling session ought to clearly outline the goals of the session. You must also contemplate the elements that influenced the event of the lesson plan. Step four. Analysis plan How will you recognize your session has been profitable? What standards will you utilize to measure success? How will you recognize in case your session goals have been met? Contemplate the kind of analysis you'll use to find out the effectiveness of your session. NOTE: you aren't required to offer any analysis instruments/ surveys on this report. SUBMISSION: • Submit your task through TURNITIN (see hyperlink on Blackboard in ‘Evaluation 2’ folder) • Phrase depend: 2000 phrases. It is a crucial tutorial and sensible ability to have the ability to talk succinctly. It's anticipated that college students will adhere to the phrase limits and never exceed the prescribed restrict by greater than 500 phrases together with in-text citations and the reference listing. Besides in beforehand accredited circumstances, appendices shouldn't be included to accommodate further phrases. All textual content included within the evaluation can be included within the phrase depend (as decided by Turnitin). In circumstances wherein the phrase depend (plus 500 phrases) is exceeded, the Evaluation is not going to be graded and the work can be returned to the scholar. The scholar may have 48-hours to resubmit their work. No penalty can be prescribed solely as a result of the written work is below the prescribed phrase depend of an assessed piece of labor. • Font: 12-point sort dimension. Use Occasions or Occasions New Roman. • Spacing: Double-line spacing • Web page numbers: to be offered on all pages. Place web page quantity in high proper hand nook • Margins: 2.54 cm on the high, backside, left-hand, and right-hand sides of the web page. • Contemplate the language you utilize when writing your report. Confer with the Diabetes Australia Place Assertion: A brand new language for diabetes – enhancing communications with and about folks with diabetes. You'll discover this place assertion on the Diabetes Australia web site: https://www.diabetesaustralia.com.au/position-statements • Your report should embody the next headings and content material: • TITLE The title ought to clearly establish the subject of the report • INTRODUCTION State the goal(s) or the aim of the report State the scope of the report/ what the report covers. • TOPIC Clarify the subject of your diabetes schooling session and use scientific proof to justify the subject you've got chosen. • TARGET GROUP Use scientific proof to explain the traits of the goal group and the relevance of the subject to the group. • GOAL, OBJECTIVES AND LESSON PLAN Define the general purpose and the goals (most two goals) of your diabetes group schooling session Clarify how your session pertains to well being behaviour idea Clarify the inventive components and studying methods used within the schooling session. Embody the lesson plan as a desk on this part of the report. Present a title in your desk. Your lesson plan ought to embody sufficient element so that a colleague might do the presentation for you. • EVALUATION PLAN Present one (1) instance of how you'd consider your diabetes schooling session. • CONCLUSION Present a short abstract and hyperlink the conclusion again to the aim of the report. • REFERENCES Embody a listing of references on a separate web page Guarantee all supportive supplies are acknowledged and referenced in line with the APA sixth referencing model DUE DATE: Week four of Examine Interval four. Wednesday 29th July 2020 at 5pm QLD time. As per the Unit Data Information, Rule Three of Guidelines Referring to Awards – Pupil Evaluation and Examinations – and the SCU Evaluation Coverage and Procedures apply to this unit. Late submission of things with out particular consideration approval will entice a penalty of 5% of accessible marks for every day (24 hour interval) or half thereof it's late (for instance, an task due at 5pm on Friday and submitted at 12pm the next Monday will entice a Three-day penalty). Confer with SCU Evaluation Procedures for full particulars. WEIGHTING: This evaluation contributes to 50% of your remaining grade for this unit. MARKING CRITERIA: Standards Excessive Distinction Distinction Credit score Move Fail Key ideas 60% Writing displays a superior understanding of theories, ideas and principal concepts of matters Writing displays an indepth understanding of theories, ideas and principal concepts of matters Writing displays a stable understanding of theories, ideas and principal concepts of matters Writing displays a good understanding of theories, ideas and principal concepts of matters Writing doesn't mirror an understanding of theories, ideas and principal concepts of matters Analysis and proof 25% Wonderful engagement with the subject. Excellent choice and use of related proof. Sources skilfully built-in into report. Superb engagement with the subject. Complete choice and use of related proof. Sources capably built-in into report. Good engagement with the subject. Competent choice and use of related proof. Sources nicely built-in into report. Good engagement with the subject. Enough choice and use of related proof. Few sources built-in into report. Primary or poor engagement with the subject. Little choice or use of related proof. Sources barely built-in into report. Presentation construction 5% Outstandingly structured report with succinct, clear introduction and powerful conclusion. Paragraphs comply with a logical sequence. Properly-structured report with clear introduction and stable conclusion. Paragraphs comply with a logical sequence. Competently structured report with clear introduction and affordable conclusion. Paragraphs largely comply with a logical sequence. Enough report with good introduction and truthful conclusion. Paragraph sequence might be extra logical. Poorly structured report with unclear introduction and weak conclusion. Paragraphs lack a logical sequence. A well-structured report with sturdy conclusion and good introduction. It follows a logical sequence. Writing model/grammar 5% Clear, coherent model with excellent consideration to spelling, punctuation and grammar. Clear, coherent model with complete consideration to spelling, punctuation and grammar. Coherent model with competent consideration to spelling, punctuation and grammar. A couple of grammatical errors. Coherent model with sufficient consideration to spelling, punctuation and grammar. Grammatical errors. Poor model with little consideration to spelling and punctuation. Sample of ungrammatical writing. Referencing and reference listing 5% All in-text citations comply with required model. Complete and right reference listing. Nearly all of in-text citations comply with required model. Complete and close to right reference listing. Most in-text citations comply with required model. Complete and customarily right reference listing. Some in-text citations comply with required model. Usually right reference listing. In-text citations don't comply with required model. Reference listing is incomplete or lacking.
PUBH6003 Health Systems and Economics
ASSESSMENT 2 BRIEF Subject Code and Title PUBH6003 Health Systems and Economics Assessment Written Debate Individual/Group Group of Three Length 2,000 words total (+/–10%) Learning Outcomes The Subject Learning Outcomes demonstrated by the successful completion of the task below include: a) Critically examine the key characteristics of health systems and apply this knowledge to local and global contexts; b) Investigate and inquire into the building blocks of health systems and interpret how they are translated globally; c) Evaluate the principles of systems thinking and promote multisectoral collaboration for the successful implementation of public health programmes; d) Analyse the key concepts and principles of health economics; and e) Evaluate the factors that influence health service supply and demand with a focus on the equitable distribution of resources. Submission Individual Position Statement (400 words +/–10%) Available at the end of Module 7 (Week 7) on Sunday at 11.55 pm, and due for submission at the end of Module 10 (Week 10) as an appendix. Part A: Submission to Discussion Forum—Group Position Statement (1,000 words +/–10%) Due at the end of Module 8 (Week 8) on Sunday at 11.55 pm AEST/AEDT Part B: Submission—Group Position Statement and Group Rebuttal Statement (2,000 words +/–10%), attaching individual position statements as an appendix. A single PDF-file submission. Due at the end of Module 10 (Week 10) on Sunday at 11.55 pm AEST/AEDT Weighting 40% Total Marks 100 marks Context Healthcare financing incorporates how funds are mobilised (raising revenue), accumulated (pooling) and allocated (purchasing) to deliver health services to individuals and population groups. Health systems cannot function without funding: reliable channels of funding are important to ensure that a health system is equitable, and that individual healthcare costs do not cause financial harm. • Revenue raising ensures that there is money and ensures sustainability. • Pooling spreads the financial risk across the population to ensure equity and efficacy. • Allocation mechanisms used to pay for health services ensures services/medicines and technology. Health financing also ensures the appropriate setting of financial incentives for the payment of health providers. Ultimately, health financing helps health systems to achieve their goals, such as health outcomes/gains, equity in the provision of health services, system efficacy and responsiveness. These key indicators are used to monitor and evaluate the health financing mechanisms adopted by different countries. Thus, knowledge of health financing will help you to understand the extent to which health system goals are achievable (or not) in a given context. This assessment is designed to encourage teamwork and collaboration. The assessment requires you to engage in extensive research and undertake a critical analysis to craft clear and strategic evidence-based arguments to support your stance: a key skill in public health advocacy and policy development. Assessment Task Your group will be provided with a topic and the stance that you will be required to argue. Critically evaluate your topic for debate (in essence, writing a position paper), as assigned to you by your learning facilitator. Consider the pros and cons for the achievement of the health system’s goals: the health outcomes (health gain), equity in health and finance, financial protection and the responsiveness of the system. Instructions The table below summarises the schedule of activities and timelines for the assessment. Allocation of Students to Groups Due: End of Module 5 (Week 5) Students will be assigned to groups (three students per group), depending on class size. Each group will be assigned a topic and team position by the learning facilitator. Draft Individual Position Statement Due: End of Module 7 (Week 7) Each student is to write a 1-page position statement (at least 400 words +/–10%) representing their argument on the assigned topic before working with one another on the group position statement. Individual position statements will be attached as an appendix to the final submission. Part A: Submission—Group Position Statement (Discussion Forum) Due: End of Module 8 (Week 8) Groups to submit their group statement on the discussion forum dedicated to this activity. Each group is to provide three clear, logical, convincing and evidence-based arguments that support their side (1,000 words +/–10%). This submission will be marked once the entire task is submitted in Week 10. Draft Group rebuttal statement Due: End of Module 10 (Week 10) Provide three clear, logical, convincing and evidence-based arguments to demolish or argue against the main points of the opposing team (1000 words +/–10%). Part B: Final Submission–Group Position Statement and Group Rebuttal, attaching Individual Position Statements as an appendix Due: End of Module 10 (Week 10) Group to submit their position statement, which should be the same as the one submitted to the discussion forum previously (1,000 words +/ 10%) and the group rebuttal (1,000 words +/–10%) and individual position statements (as an appendix). All documents to be submitted as a single PDF file. Note: Each team member should fill out the evaluation form individually and confidentially and submit it using the ‘Team Member Evaluation Form Submission’ link. The Evaluation Form is available for download under the Assessment Information. Details Individual Position Statement You are required to initially work individually on the topic assigned to your group by the learning facilitator. As a group you need to establish three arguments and each argument needs to be allocated to an individual group member. You will conduct some preliminary research relevant to the argument you are allocated and synthesise and analyse the researched material to build arguments to support your viewpoint. You are also required to demonstrate your ability to integrate knowledge about aspects and perspectives, which you may need to argue against the opposition team’s main arguments. Your Individual Position Statement will be integrated in the overall group statement. Group Position Statement Address each of the below points clearly and concisely in your group position statement to successfully complete the task. 1. Present your overall argument in a clear statement. 2. Provide background information on the topic to explain its importance. Define the issue if required. 3. Provide the first supporting statement with evidence from credible/academic sources of information; paraphrase with parenthetical citations. 4. Provide second supporting statement with evidence from credible/academic sources; paraphrase with parenthetical citations. 5. Provide, the third supporting statement with evidence from credible/academic sources; paraphrase with parenthetical citations. 6. Conclusion. Restate the main argument and synthesise the main key points to explain the significance of the issue. Do not introduce new information. Group Rebuttal Statement Here are some rebuttal strategies that you can use: 1. Thesis statement. This statement should directly oppose the thesis statement of the original claim that you are countering. 2. Address and counter each of the three supporting arguments point-by-point by providing an evidence-based analysis, explanation and specific examples that support your overall point. 3. Write a conclusion synthesising the main points. Assessment Components By the end of Module 10 (Week 10), each group needs to submit the following as a single PDF file • Group Position Statement—1,000 words (+/–10%) • Group Rebuttal Statement—1,000 words (+/–10%) • Individual Position Statements (as an appendix). • Team Evaluation Form (Download from the Assessment 2 folder for this subject, complete individually and confidently, and submit using the submission link provided). Refer to the table above for instructions on what these assessment components include. Other Guidelines Referencing It is essential that you use appropriate APA style for citing and referencing research. For more information on referencing, visit https://library.torrens.edu.au/academicskills/apa/tool. Submission Instructions Group Position Statements are to be submitted via the main navigation menu for Assessments for PUBH6003 Health Systems and Economics under the link Assessment 2: Part A: Discussion Forum at the end of Module 8 (Week 8). All components need to be submitted as a single PDF file under the Assessment 2: Part B link at the end of Module 10 (Week 10). There should only be ONE submission per group. The learning facilitator will provide feedback via the Grade Centre in the LMS portal. Feedback can be viewed in My Grades. Breach of academic integrity should be reported using the AI form for further investigation, and the prescribed action will be taken when a breach is identified. Link to the AI form: https://forms.office.com/Pages/ResponsePage.aspx?id=LHnjo3LvaES2Lae0hBR2mHZtqLr0sCZFtSJb7j Z7gOtURTlGOFQ4ODgzUDZOMk5FTDdGV0tUS1NGRSQlQCN0PWcu Academic Integrity Declaration We declare that except where referenced, the work we are submitting for this assessment task is our own. We have read and are aware of the Torrens University Australia Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure, viewable online at http://www.torrens.edu.au/policies-and-forms. We are also aware that we need to keep a copy of all submitted material and their drafts, and we agree to do so. Assessment Rubric Assessment Attributes Fail (Yet to achieve minimum standard) 0–49% Pass (Functional) 50–64% Credit (Proficient) 65–74% Distinction (Advanced) 75–84% High Distinction (Exceptional) 85–100% Knowledge and understanding of health financing mechanisms; that is, raising revenue, pooling revenue and purchasing. Ability to assess the quality of the mechanisms via their effects on health outcomes (health gain), equity in health and finance, financial protection and responsiveness. 30% Fails to show or shows a partially developed understanding of health financing for health system’s goals (pros and cons). Limited evaluation and analysis of the quality of mechanisms against their effects on health outcomes, equity in health and finance, financial protection and responsiveness. Confuses logic and emotion. Information taken from reliable sources but without coherent analysis or synthesis. Demonstrates functional knowledge of health financing for health system’s goals (pros and cons). Demonstrates some analysis and evaluation of the quality of mechanisms against their effects on health outcomes, equity in health and finance, financial protection and responsiveness. Analysis and evaluation do not reflect expert judgement, intellectual independence, rigor and adaptability. Demonstrates proficient knowledge of health financing for health system’s goals (pros and cons). Well-developed analysis and evaluation of the quality of mechanisms against their effects on health outcomes, equity in health and finance, financial protection and responsiveness. Identifies logical flaws. Analysis and evaluation reflect expert judgement, intellectual independence, rigor and adaptability. Demonstrates advanced knowledge of health financing for health system’s goals (pros and cons). Thoroughly developed analysis and evaluation of the quality of mechanisms against their effects on health outcomes, equity in health and finance, financial protection and responsiveness. Analysis and evaluation reflect growing judgement, intellectual independence, rigor and adaptability. Demonstrates exceptional knowledge of health financing for health system’s goals (pros and cons). Highly sophisticated evaluation and analysis of the quality of mechanisms against their effects on health outcomes, equity in health and finance, financial protection and responsiveness. Identifies gaps in knowledge. Exhibits intellectual independence, rigor, good judgement and adaptability. Assessment Attributes Fail (Yet to achieve minimum standard) 0–49% Pass (Functional) 50–64% Credit (Proficient) 65–74% Distinction (Advanced) 75–84% High Distinction (Exceptional) 85–100% Structure and presentation of group position statement. 20% No clear position taken; reasons undeveloped; no supporting facts are used. Position statement was not supported. Position not clearly stated; development is brief; unrelated, unsupported general statements, reasons, and details; minimal facts used. Counter arguments are not acknowledged. Position statement was well supported, but others were not. Clear position taken and defined; some reasons and some details are presented, but these are not fully developed. Counter arguments addressed. Position statement was supported with facts, statistics and/or examples, but the relevance of some was questionable. Clear position taken and defined; uses at least three appropriate reasons with some development. Counter arguments addressed in detail. Position statement was adequately supported with relevant facts, statistics and/or examples. Takes a strong, well defined position; uses three appropriate reasons with at least two supporting details for each reason. Counter arguments effectively addressed, without undercutting the other team’s position. Position statement was well supported with several relevant facts, statistics and/or examples. Position statement has a clear and defined purpose, and uses at least three reasons. Counter arguments are well-supported by supporting facts and statistics. Structure and presentation of rebuttal arguments. 15% Counterarguments were not accurate and/or relevant. Arguments were not tied to an idea at all. Absence of crossexamination or rebuttals, failure to point out problems in other team’s position; failure to defend its position statement. Some counterarguments were weak and irrelevant. Arguments were not tied well to an idea. Poor cross-examination or rebuttals; pointed out one or two problems in other team’s position; defended its position statement weakly. Most counterarguments were accurate and relevant, but several were weak. All arguments were clearly tied to an idea (premise) but the organisation was sometimes not clear or logical. Decent cross-examination and/or rebuttals, but some significant problems. Most counterarguments were accurate, relevant, and strong. Most arguments were clearly tied to an idea (premise) and organised in a tight, logical fashion. Good cross-examination and rebuttals with only minor slip-ups. All counterarguments were accurate, relevant and strong. All arguments were clearly tied to an idea (premise) and organised in a tight, logical fashion. Excellent cross-examination and rebuttal against the other team’s arguments/position statement. Assessment Attributes Fail (Yet to achieve minimum standard) 0–49% Pass (Functional) 50–64% Credit (Proficient) 65–74% Distinction (Advanced) 75–84% High Distinction (Exceptional) 85–100% Substantiation of information selected on health financing for health system’s goals to support the group’s arguments 15% Limited understanding of key concepts required to support the case study. Viewpoints of experts are taken as fact and subject to little questioning. Resembles a recall or summary of key ideas. Often conflates/confuses the assertion of personal opinion with information substantiated by evidence from the research/course materials. Demonstrates a capacity to explain and apply relevant concepts. Supports personal opinion; information substantiated by evidence from the research/course materials. Questions viewpoints of experts. Well-demonstrated capacity to explain and apply relevant concepts. Discriminates between the assertion of personal opinion and information substantiated by robust evidence from the research/course materials and extended reading. Viewpoints of experts are subject to questioning. Information is taken from sources with a high level of interpretation/evaluation to develop a comprehensive critical analysis or synthesis. Systematically and critically discriminates between the assertion of personal opinion and information substantiated by robust evidence from the research/course materials and extended reading. Team work 10% Does not participate effectively in a team environment. Places individual goals ahead of group responsibilities. Hinders the group process and upsets the schedule. Participates effectively in teams. Identifies team and individual goals, tasks, responsibilities and schedules. Contributes to group processes. Supports the team. Contributes to small group discussions to reach agreement on issues. Works together with others towards shared goals. Renegotiates responsibilities as necessary. Understands group dynamics and team roles. Facilitates team development. Renegotiates responsibilities, tasks and schedules as necessary. Builds team’s identity and commitment. Leads teams. Evaluates team outcomes. Implements strategies to enhance team effectiveness. Assessment Attributes Fail (Yet to achieve minimum standard) 0–49% Pass (Functional) 50–64% Credit (Proficient) 65–74% Distinction (Advanced) 75–84% High Distinction (Exceptional) 85–100% Correct citation of key resources and evidence. Health financing for health system’s goals 10% Demonstrates inconsistent use of good quality, credible and relevant resources to support and develop ideas. Referencing is omitted or does not resemble APA. Uses credible and relevant resources to support and develop ideas, but these are not always explicit or well developed. Referencing resembles APA but contains frequent or repeated errors. Uses credible resources to support and develop ideas. Referencing resembles APA but contains occasional errors. Uses good quality, credible and relevant resources to support and develop arguments and statements. Shows evidence of wide scope within the organisation for sourcing evidence. APA referencing is free of errors. Uses high-quality, credible and relevant resources to support and develop arguments and position statements. Shows evidence of wide scope within and without the organisation for sourcing evidence. APA referencing is free of errors. The following Subject Learning Outcomes are addressed in this assessment SLO a) Critically examine the key characteristics of health systems and apply this knowledge to local and global contexts. SLO b) Investigate and inquire into the building blocks of health systems and interpret how they are translated globally. SLO c) Evaluate the principles of systems thinking and promote multi-sectoral collaboration for the successful implementation of public health programmes. SLO d) Analyse the key concepts and principles of health economics. SLO e) Evaluate the factors that influence health service supply and demand with a focus on the equitable distribution of resources.
Week 4 discussion SEC 315
Prison Justice Title: Week four dialogue SEC 315 Variety of sources: zero Paper directions: Personnel safety, or defending a company’s human sources, is crucial. In any case, it's the individuals who do the work of the group. Many office insurance policies and procedures give attention to defending workers and educating safety consciousness. Defending workers from office violence is a crucial element of personnel safety. What are the important thing parts of an efficient office violence prevention program?
Private Security and the Law SEC 315
Prison Justice Title: Personal Safety and the Legislation SEC 315 Variety of sources: zero Paper directions: Overview For this task, you'll analysis after which analyze the variations between the powers of arrest for personal residents and for cops in your state. Directions Write a 1–2 web page paper through which you: Summarize the powers of arrest for personal residents and for cops in your state. Evaluate and distinction the powers of arrest for these two occupations. Clarify why variations exist within the powers of arrest between these two occupations. Describe the circumstances below which a personal citizen could make an arrest in your state. Clarify the potential liabilities a personal citizen would possibly face when making an arrest. Decide the important thing standards essential to make an arrest in your state for a given scenario. Combine no less than two high quality sources utilizing in-text citations and a supply listing web page in your task. Be aware: Wikipedia and related Web sites don't qualify as high quality sources. This course requires the usage of Strayer Writing Requirements. For help and knowledge, please confer with the Strayer Writing Requirements hyperlink within the left-hand menu of your course. Examine together with your professor for any extra directions The precise course studying final result related to this task is: Analyze the affect of legal guidelines and the authorized setting on non-public safety.
Week 4 discussion COM 201
Communications Title: Week four dialogue COM 201 Variety of sources: zero Paper directions: Immediately, you acquired an invite from the president of the varsity board asking you to ship an informative speech at Everytown Excessive Faculty. As a result of college students at Everytown Excessive Faculty are at present finding out world local weather change, the president of the varsity board would love you to deal with this matter as properly. Assessment the sources listed under and select the one you'll use in your informative speech. Totally clarify why the supply is an effective alternative. A ebook entitled The Information to World Local weather Change (printed in 2015). A prerecorded interview with an worker on the Smithsonian Environmental Analysis Middle. A documentary movie explaining world local weather change.
Informative Speech Outline
Communications Title: Informative Speech Define Variety of sources: zero Paper directions: Robust oral communication abilities shall be beneficial to you all through your tutorial journey and are in excessive demand by many employers. Creating a top level view is essential to your success in crafting an efficient speech. For this task, you'll create a top level view. The speech based mostly in your define is due subsequent week. Directions Choose both Subject A or Subject B on your informative speech. Subject A: How Expertise Has Impacted Society. Subject B: Historical past of Your Hometown. Create a top level view or talking notes in Microsoft Phrase. Obtain the Pattern Define [DOCX], which offers steering for the construction of a top level view. Focus your speech on 2–Three details so you will keep inside the Three-minute time restrict. Submit the finished define in a Microsoft Phrase doc. Necessities Your task shall be graded in line with the next standards: The define is full and on matter. The define offers strong move for the speech. The define is obvious and free from spelling and grammar points. You have to incorporate no less than two high quality sources. This course requires using Strayer Writing Requirements. For help and knowledge, please check with the Strayer Writing Requirements hyperlink within the left-hand menu of your course. Examine along with your professor for any further directions. The precise course studying consequence related to this task is: Define a speech utilizing a structured move and correct spelling and grammar.
Required Uniform Assignment: Case Study Presentation
1 NR324/329 Grownup Well being I Required Uniform Project: Case Examine Presentation NR324/329 RUA: Case Presentation Tips V2 Revised: 5/2019 11 Function The aim of this task is to assist college students construct communication abilities, make the most of proof‐primarily based analysis related to nursing apply, and apply ideas of security and high quality in nursing care of adults. The targets of this task are to: • foster teamwork and collaboration by means of efficient communication • Make the most of analysis proof to advertise protected and high quality nursing take care of adults in acute care settings. Course outcomes: This task permits the coed to satisfy the next course outcomes: CO 1. Present efficient skilled nursing take care of grownup sufferers and their households in acute care settings utilizing the nursing course of. (PO#1) CO three. Display efficient communication abilities vital for collaboration with different well being care staff members and for offering skilled nursing care to grownup sufferers and their households. (PO #three) CO four. Apply vital pondering methods to make good scientific choices within the grownup affected person scientific setting. (PO#four) CO eight. Make the most of nursing analysis literature whereas offering care to grownup sufferers and their households in acute care settings. (PO #eight) Due date: Your school member will inform you when this task is due. The Late Project Coverage applies to this task. Whole factors attainable: 100 factors Getting ready the task The coed group should develop a case research primarily based on an precise or potential scientific‐primarily based state of affairs on the grownup well being subjects introduced through the eight‐week session. The coed group should current the subject and literature for the case situation. College students should embrace the next info within the case research presentation: A. Well being Historical past – age, gender, ethnicity, previous and present medical historical past, chief grievance, and historical past of current sickness on admission. B. Laboratory/Diagnostic Testing – describe the diagnostic assessments ordered/accomplished, pertinent outcomes (together with regular and irregular ranges), and rationales for using every diagnostic check. C. Collaborative Administration – present record of medicines, remedies, dietary prescriptions, and procedures which have been ordered, administered, accomplished, and/or pending. Moreover, present an summary of members of the healthcare staff concerned in managing the care of the particular person and household and the interdisciplinary targets which have been set. Briefly record the position of the staff member within the affected person’s care and the methods by which the nurse collaborates to satisfy the interdisciplinary targets. D. Nursing administration – utilizing the nursing course of, develop two plans of care ‐ 1 associated to 1 precedence physiological nursing prognosis and 1 associated to 1 precedence psychosocial nursing prognosis. Please embrace the next info in every plan of care: • Precedence nursing prognosis • brief and 1 lengthy‐time period purpose • to five nursing interventions with rationale statements, • to five evaluative statements primarily based on interventions, and • A minimal of three potential affected person schooling wants for consideration. 2 NR324/329 Grownup Well being I Required Uniform Project: Case Examine Presentation NR324/329 RUA: Case Presentation Tips V2 Revised: 5/2019 21 Project Submission Necessities: • College students should obtain approval from the college on the chosen matter for the case research presentation task. The college will facilitate choice of subjects throughout class. • Every pupil within the group should contribute to the event of the case research info. • Every pupil group should submit a 1‐web page typed paper containing the Well being Historical past, Laboratory/Diagnostic Testing, and Collaborative Administration components of the case research. • Every pupil group should submit a 1‐web page typed paper of the plan of care addressing the precedence physiological nursing prognosis and a 1‐web page typed paper of the plan of care addressing the precedence psychosocial nursing prognosis. College students might select to submit an idea map for every of the precedence nursing diagnoses as an alternative of a plan of care. Every idea map should incorporate the identical info required for the plans of care. • Every pupil group should submit a reference record with every member’s nursing care plan or idea map, formatted based on APA 6TH version. A minimal of a minimum of three (three) references are required for this task. Scholar should cite a minimum of two (2) analysis or proof‐primarily based apply (EBP) sources. All sources should be inside 5 years of publication. • Every pupil group is required to develop and current a 15 minute presentation on a subject from the case research, the plan of care or the idea map. Every group presentation will all a further 5 minutes for questions and solutions related to the content material of the presentation and/or the scientific expertise. * If a pupil within the group is absent the day of the presentation, the coed group is not going to be penalized. NR324/329 Grownup Well being I Required Uniform Project: Case Examine Presentation NR324/329 RUA: Case Presentation Tips V2 Revised: 5/2019 31 Grading Rubric Standards are met when the coed’s software of data demonstrates achievement of the outcomes for this task. Project Part and Required Standards (Factors attainable/% of complete factors out there) Highest Degree of Efficiency Excessive Degree of Efficiency Passable Degree of Efficiency Unsatisfactory Degree of Efficiency Well being Historical past (10 factors/10%) 10 factors 9 factors eight factors zero factors Required standards 1. Presents pertinent and related info on: the particular person’s age, gender, ethnicity, previous and present medical historical past, chief grievance, and historical past of current sickness on admission. • Comprehensively presents key/related Info precisely and in ample element: particular person’s age, gender, ethnicity, previous and present medical historical past, chief grievance, and historical past of current sickness on admission. • Info introduced in a transparent, organized, method • One of many key/related Info not introduced: particular person’s age, gender, ethnicity, previous and present medical historical past, chief grievance, and historical past of current sickness on admission. • Key/related info are correct and introduced in ample element. • Info introduced in a transparent, organized, method Two of the important thing/related Info not introduced: particular person’s age, gender, ethnicity, previous and present medical historical past, chief grievance, and historical past of current sickness on admission. Key/related info could also be inaccurate and/or inadequate intimately. Info introduced in a transparent, organized, method three or extra of the important thing/related Info not introduced: particular person’s age, gender, ethnicity, previous and present medical historical past, chief grievance, and historical past of current sickness on admission. Key/related info could also be inaccurate and/or inadequate intimately. • Info shouldn't be clear, organized, or skilled in look. Laboratory and Diagnostic Testing (10 factors/10%) 10 factors 9 factors eight factors zero factors Required standards 1. Presents description of the ordered/accomplished diagnostic assessments, pertinent outcomes (together with regular and irregular ranges), and rationales for every diagnostic check. • Comprehensively presents key/related Info precisely and in ample element: description of the ordered/accomplished diagnostic assessments, pertinent outcomes (regular and irregular ranges), • One of many key/related Info not introduced: description of the ordered/ accomplished diagnostic assessments, pertinent outcomes (regular and irregular ranges), and rationales for every diagnostic check. • Two of the important thing/related Info not introduced: description of the ordered/ accomplished diagnostic assessments, pertinent outcomes (regular and irregular ranges), and rationales for every diagnostic check. • three or extra of the important thing/related Info not introduced: description of the ordered/ accomplished diagnostic assessments, pertinent outcomes (regular and irregular ranges), and rationales for every diagnostic check. NR324/329 Grownup Well being I Required Uniform Project: Case Examine Presentation NR324/329 RUA: Case Presentation Tips V2 Revised: 5/2019 41 and rationales for every diagnostic check. • Info introduced in a transparent, organized, method • Key/related info are correct and introduced in ample element. • Info introduced in a transparent, organized, method • Key/related info are correct and introduced in ample element. • Info introduced in a transparent, organized, method • Key/related info could also be inaccurate and/or inadequate intimately. • Info shouldn't be clear, organized, or skilled in look. Collaborative Administration (20 factors/20%) 20 factors 15 factors 10 factors zero factors Required standards Presents record of medicines, remedies, dietary prescriptions, and procedures which have been ordered, administered, accomplished, and/or pending Moreover, present an summary of members of the healthcare staff concerned in managing the particular person and household. Briefly record their position within the care supplied and the way nursing collaborates in assembly interdisciplinary targets. • Complete dialogue of collaborative administration together with: record of medicines, remedies, dietary prescriptions, and procedures which have been ordered, administered, accomplished, and/or pending. • Full overview of members of the healthcare staff concerned in managing the particular person and household; Listed ALL key/related roles within the care supplied and the way nursing collaborates in assembly interdisciplinary targets. • Info introduced in a transparent, organized, method. • Mentioned collaborative administration, however doesn't embrace 1of this stuff: record of medicines, remedies, dietary prescriptions, and procedures which have been ordered, administered, accomplished, and/or pending • Full overview of members of the healthcare staff concerned in managing the particular person and household; Listed many of the key/related roles within the care supplied and the way nursing collaborates in assembly interdisciplinary targets • Info introduced in a transparent, organized, method. • Mentioned collaborative administration, however doesn't embrace 2 of this stuff: record of medicines, remedies, dietary prescriptions, and procedures which have been ordered, administered, accomplished, and/or pending. • Common overview of members of the healthcare staff concerned in managing the particular person and household; Listed SOME key/related roles within the care supplied and the way nursing collaborates in assembly interdisciplinary targets. • Info shouldn't be introduced in a transparent, organized, and/or skilled method. • Poor/Minimal dialogue of collaborative administration which doesn't embrace three or extra of this stuff: record of medicines, remedies, dietary prescriptions, and procedures which have been ordered, administered, accomplished, and/or pending. • Poor/Broad overview of members of the healthcare staff concerned in managing the particular person and household; Listed SOME of key/related roles within the care supplied and the way nursing collaborates in assembly interdisciplinary targets. • Info shouldn't be introduced in a transparent, organized, and/or skilled method. Nursing Administration: Physiologic 15 factors 12 factors eight factors zero factors NR324/329 Grownup Well being I Required Uniform Project: Case Examine Presentation NR324/329 RUA: Case Presentation Tips V2 Revised: 5/2019 51 (15 factors/15%) Required standards Utilized the nursing course of to develop two plans of care: 1 physiological and 1 psychosocial nursing prognosis Included the next info in every* plan of care: 1. Precedence nursing prognosis 2. 1 brief‐time period and 1 lengthy‐time period purpose three. three ‐ 5 nursing interventions with rationale statements four. three ‐ 5 evaluative statements primarily based on interventions 5. A minimal of three educating concerns Used the nursing course of to develop a plan of take care of physiological nursing prognosis All info within the plan of care included: o Precedence nursing prognosis o 1 brief‐time period and 1 lengthy‐ time period purpose o three ‐ 5 nursing interventions with rationale statements o three ‐ 5 evaluative statements primarily based on interventions o A minimal of three educating concerns Used the nursing course of to develop a plan of take care of physiological nursing prognosis Lacking 1 merchandise of knowledge within the plan of care: o Precedence nursing prognosis o 1 brief‐ time period and 1 lengthy‐ time period purpose o three ‐ 5 nursing interventions with rationale statements o three ‐ 5 evaluative statements primarily based on interventions o A minimal of three educating concerns Used the nursing course of to develop a plan of take care of physiological nursing prognosis Lacking 2 objects of knowledge within the plan of care: o Precedence nursing prognosis o 1 brief‐time period and 1 lengthy‐ time period purpose o three ‐ 5 nursing interventions with rationale statements o three ‐ 5 evaluative statements primarily based on interventions o A minimal of three educating concerns Used the nursing course of to develop a plan of take care of physiological nursing prognosis Lacking three or extra objects of knowledge within the care plan: o Precedence nursing prognosis o 1 brief‐time period and 1 lengthy‐ time period purpose o three ‐ 5 nursing interventions with rationale statements o three ‐ 5 evaluative statements primarily based on interventions o A minimal of three educating concerns Nursing Administration: Psychosocial (15 factors/15%) 15 factors 12 factors eight factors zero factors Required standards Utilized the nursing course of to develop two plans of care: 1 physiological and 1 psychosocial nursing prognosis Included the next info in every* plan of care: 1. Precedence nursing prognosis 2. 1 brief‐time period and 1 lengthy‐time period purpose three. three ‐ 5 nursing interventions with rationale statements Used the nursing course of to develop a plan of take care of psychosocial nursing prognosis All info within the plan of care included: o Precedence nursing prognosis o brief‐time period and 1 lengthy‐ time period purpose o three ‐ 5 nursing interventions with rationale statements Used the nursing course of to develop a plan of take care of psychosocial nursing prognosis Lacking 1 merchandise of knowledge within the plan of care: o o Precedence nursing prognosis o o 1 brief‐time period and 1 lengthy‐ time period purpose Used the nursing course of to develop a plan of take care of psychosocial nursing prognosis Lacking 2 objects of knowledge within the plan of care: o o Precedence nursing prognosis o o 1 brief‐time period and 1 lengthy‐ time period purpose o three ‐ 5 nursing Used the nursing course of to develop a plan of take care of psychosocial nursing prognosis Lacking three or extra objects of knowledge within the care plan: o Precedence nursing prognosis o 1 brief‐time period and 1 lengthy‐ time period purpose o three ‐ 5 nursing NR324/329 Grownup Well being I Required Uniform Project: Case Examine Presentation NR324/329 RUA: Case Presentation Tips V2 Revised: 5/2019 61 four. three ‐ 5 evaluative statements primarily based on interventions 5. A minimal of three educating concerns o three ‐ 5 evaluative statements primarily based on interventions o A minimal of three educating concerns o three ‐ 5 nursing interventions with rationale statements o three ‐ 5 evaluative statements primarily based on interventions o A minimal of three educating concerns interventions with rationale statements o three ‐ 5 evaluative statements primarily based on interventions o A minimal of three educating concerns interventions with rationale statements o three ‐ 5 evaluative statements primarily based on interventions o A minimal of three educating concerns Presentation (25 factors/25%) 25 factors 20 factors 15 factors zero factors Required standards 1. All parts of the task tips included. 2. Info introduced in a logical, attention-grabbing sequence which viewers can observe. three. Participation by all group members. four. All presenters are skilled and demonstrated acceptable presence all through presentation. 5. Used presentation supplies and strategies successfully. 6. Responded appropriately to viewers questions. • ALL required task parts are current. • Info is introduced in a logical sequence; predominant concepts straightforward for the viewers to observe. • Participation is by all group members. • Presenters are skilled • Presenters maintained acceptable eye contact with viewers and projected voices for all viewers to listen to. • Presenters addressed viewers questions appropriately. • Used presentation supplies and strategies successfully. • Presenters stayed inside allotted 20‐minute timeframe. • ONE required task element is lacking. • Info is introduced in a logical sequence; predominant concepts straightforward for the viewers to observe. • Participation is by all group members. • Presenters are skilled. • Presenters have restricted eye contact OR the viewers has problem listening to the presenters. • Presenters addressed viewers questions appropriately. • Used presentation supplies and strategies successfully. • Presenters stayed inside allotted 20‐ minute timeframe. • 1‐2 required task parts are lacking. • Info shouldn't be introduced in a logical sequence, but predominant concepts are nonetheless apparent. • Participation is by all group members. • Presenters are skilled. • Presenters have restricted eye contact OR the viewers has problem listening to the presenters. • Presenters addressed viewers questions appropriately. • Used presentation supplies and strategies successfully. • Presenters stayed inside 5 minutes of the allotted 20 minute timeframe. • three or extra required task parts are lacking. • There is no such thing as a logical sequence to presentation of fabric; predominant concepts troublesome to observe. • Some members didn't take part. • Some or ALL presenters are unprofessional. • Presenters have restricted eye contact OR the viewers has problem listening to the presenters. • Presenters didn't tackle viewers questions appropriately. • Didn't successfully use presentation supplies and strategies. • Presenters stayed inside 5‐10 minutes of the allotted 20 minute time-frame. NR324/329 Grownup Well being I Required Uniform Project: Case Examine Presentation NR324/329 RUA: Case Presentation Tips V2 Revised: 5/2019 71 APA Fashion and Group (5 factors/5%) 5 factors four factors 2 factors zero factors Required standards 1. References are submitted with task. 2. Makes use of acceptable APA format (sixth ed.) and is free of errors. three. Grammar and mechanics are freed from errors. four. Used a minimum of three (three) completely different sources, with at least two (2) from analysis literature. • Greater than three references used, a minimum of 2 are analysis articles • References submitted with task • Citations and references are listed utilizing APA format (sixth ed.) and are freed from errors. • Precisely three references used, a minimum of 2 are analysis articles • References submitted with task • Citations and references are listed utilizing APA format (sixth ed.), however have one kind of error. • Two (2) references used, a minimum of 1 is a analysis article • References submitted with task • Citations and references are listed utilizing APA format (sixth ed.), however have two forms of errors. • One to Two references used, however are NOT analysis articles • References submitted with task • Citations and references are listed utilizing APA format for citations and, however have three or extra forms of errors. Function Getting ready the task Grading Rubric -research paper writing service