Watch the Challenger Area Shuttle case examine video (extra Recordsdata or https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mG8BPB_oPlg&characteristic=youtu.be ) after which reply to all of matters and questions listed beneath. 800-1000 phrases (be thorough however succinct Your response should be created in MS Phrase format. Use acceptable APA fashion/construction for this project together with using headings, sections, references, and correct formatting for a paper. You don’t want an summary, however the intro must be a synopsis of the case examine and what you’ll talk about. Please use no less than two references general for this project to help your responses. Questions: 1. Contemplating the Challenger Area Shuttle tragedy that occurred in 1986 (see extra recordsdata or https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mG8BPB_oPlg&characteristic=youtu.be ), give a synopsis of what you understand to be the main dangers (5 minimal) that ought to have been thought of BEFORE the tragedy occurred. The obvious can be an “explosion,” so please think about extra dangers in your listing. You could have to do extra analysis on this particular incident and/or different tasks of this sort to develop your listing. 2. Utilizing your judgment and primarily based on extra analysis, how would you rank these dangers? Moreover give a sign of likelihood (Excessive, Medium, Low) of occurring and the impression for every (Excessive, Medium, Low) as this will likely additionally assist you to develop your rankings. Please embody the “explosion” danger talked about in #1 when rating the dangers along with these in your listing. You could need to think about a desk or matrix to indicate your response. RPI Quantity: use the “Threat Likelihood Affect” quantity (or RPI quantity) as a technique to give a price to your dangers – referred to as “qualitative danger evaluation” (sure, ‘qualitative’ and never ‘quantative’ regardless that you give it a price). Utilizing the RPI quantity for questions #2 will not be required, however is talked about to offer you one choice that can assist you rank your dangers for this query. If you happen to do determine to calculate an RPI quantity, you’d give the likelihood a price (resembling a % or scale like 1 to five) and a number of it by the impression, which has additionally been given a price (such 1 to five scale). For example, a danger that has a excessive likelihood of occurring (80% likelihood) and is set to have a really excessive impression (worth of 5 on a 1 to five scale) would have an RPI variety of zero.80 x 5 = four. In distinction, a danger with a low likelihood of occurring (10%) and a low impression (1 on a scale of 1 to five) would have an RPI variety of zero.10 x 1 = zero.1. Now, you can also make a comparability and rank these danger and deal with the one with the very best RPI quantity. three. Have been there any dangers that ought to have been taken extra critically and prioritized – – in different phrases, was there any mounting proof or different compelling causes to imagine that sure dangers had the next likelihood of occurring? four. Have been there any “triggers” that indicated a possible danger was changing into an issue or situation (realized danger)? 5. What do you think about to be the first classes discovered from this horrible tragedy? 6. In your opinion, may this tragedy have been prevented if a radical danger evaluation had been accomplished and carried out together with cautious monitoring of triggers and consideration of mounting considerations earlier than the liftoff? Please clarify your response.