Particular person project 1 – Article Critique
HC1052 Organisational Behaviour
Trimester 2 2017
Date Due: Friday Week 11, 2017 by 5:00 PM Marks: Weighting 20%
Evaluation Weight: 20%
• College students are required to write down an article critique of 1,500 phrases o The article that you could learn and critically assess has been posted (together with this rubric) to Blackboard below ‘Assignments & Due Dates’
• The critique needs to be:
o Written in normal essay format
o Be typed or phrase processed in Instances New Roman or Arial, 12
Font Dimension o Be formatted with 1.5 line spacing
• The Article Critique that you simply write should:
o Determine a related Thesis Assertion or Query from the article o Determine the strengths and weaknesses of the article primarily based on the Thesis Assertion
o Present your individual viewpoint – what do you consider?
o Do you agree with the thesis assertion of the article or don’t agree?
o State your key factors and Why? Why not?
o Present proof and analysis from different tutorial sources (a minimum of three) to assist and again your argument
o Present use and understanding of sophistication ideas discovered at school that pertains to the topic of the article
o A stable conclusion to your essay
PLEASE NOTE: This project is NOT only a abstract of the article. It’s a critique to point out that you simply perceive what the writer is attempting to convey and you can present your individual crucial evaluation and evaluation of the arguments for and in opposition to, in addition to present proof to assist your individual opinion on the topic.
• Embrace an inventory of appropriately formatted references and likewise present in your essay the place you used them (utilizing normal Harvard Referencing Model)
Particular person project – Article Critique 1
•
Marking Standards
The 20% of marks will likely be allotted for exhibiting:
ASSESSMENT 1 CRITERIA
N/A Poor Truthful Good Very
Good Glorious
Vital evaluation of the article (6 marks)
Understanding and comprehension of the case research article (5 marks)
Format, excellence and power of your argument/conclusion (four marks)
Acceptable referencing( Harvard referencing fashion) and use of further analysis (three marks)
Use and inclusion of phrases and ideas from class lectures (2 marks)
Deduction for late, copied, or plagiarised work (as much as complete marks earned)
Whole out of 20
Particular person project – Article Critique 2