Evaluation Data
Topic Code:
Topic Identify:
Evaluation Title:
Weighting:
Complete Marks:
Due Date: MAN201
Organisational Behaviour
Evaluation three – Create a podcast
30%
30
Week 12 (to be offered at school) Particular person submission of Pdf copy of script uploaded to Turnitin Monday week 12
Evaluation Description
.
Create a 10-minute particular person podcast on a subject of your selection from lectures 5-11. You’re to collaborate as a group at school on the subject of your selection at school after which create a person podcast and submit as a person.
1. Select a particular query from matters lined from weeks 5 to 11
2. Search about how you can create a podcast, you should utilize your cellphone recording and or lots of the free open supply instruments.
three. Determine on the function/character strategy you’ll undertake in your podcast. (eg. supervisor, worker, CEO, you should utilize a buddy if you wish to carry in additional characters)
four. Write the script (You have to add your script to Turnitin). Ensure you focus on a related, present and fascinating subject and combine analysis.
5. Begin recording your first podcast. Please see the rubric to see what’s required.
6. We are going to hearken to the podcasts within the class throughout week 12 as a part of evaluate and peer evaluate your podcast along with your classmates based mostly on the rubric.
Standards Fail Go (grade four) Credit score (grade 5) Distinction (grade 6) Excessive (grade 7)
Understanding of the subject Key factors unnoticed. No grasp of points that confronted the shopper. Over reliance on notes. Consists of some points however evaluation glossed over. Workforce appeared uncomfortable to transcend key details. Consists of all points, evaluation and proposals however with little elaboration. Not built-in with principle or will not be justified. Builds convincing argument displaying how key points, evaluation and proposals are built-in collectively. Builds convincing argument displaying how all key factors are built-in collectively. Makes use of examples to elaborate the important thing factors and principle.
Introduction / Conclusion Introduction lacking or underdeveloped. Viewers has no thought what the presentation will probably be or was about. No conclusion.
Presentation simply finishes. Restricted readability of goal / overview. Highlights key points however interpretation of those. Conclusion weak. Doesn’t tie in with what was launched. Offers goal for presentation, highlights and interprets key points to be addressed however suggestion however not built-in. As for degree beneath plus exhibits consistency between advertising drawback identification and closing
suggestions nicely established. Partaking conclusion clearly sums up presentation and relates again to the introduction.
Proof of research No references to any sources. Options/suggestions simply appear seem. Steps utilized in evaluation proven however little justification why or how these are used to develop suggestions. Background analysis and evaluation of that is clearly identifiable.
Steps used are proven and a few rationale for the event of suggestions offered. Proof of intensive analysis and evaluation: journals, prescribed textual content, different books, verified web sites, main analysis. Used references to justify evaluation As for degree beneath plus in a position to make use of references to again up claims and proposals made. Suggestions clear come from the evaluation of the challenge.
Organisation and creativity of the podcast No construction to the presentation.
Viewers can not comply with sequence.
No introduction or conclusion. Obvious that group just isn’t working nicely collectively. Group members lacking (with out legitimate motive) or not contributing. Concepts not targeted. Viewers might have issue following argument. Details troublesome to establish. No transition between key factors. Awkward transition between audio system. Presentation seems to be performed by people quite than group. Important concepts offered in logical method. Circulation of presentation could also be awkward. Group members display that they’ve labored on presentation as a complete.
All group members take equal share in presentation. Important concepts offered in logical method. Circulation of presentation easy between audio system. Exhibits that the group has labored collaboratively Concepts clearly organised so viewers can comply with simply. The aim of the presentation is evident in all phases. Seamless transition between audio system.
Complete Feedback
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Copyright Rules 1969
This materials has been reproduced and communicated to you by or on behalf of Kaplan Enterprise College pursuant to Half VB of the Copyright Act 1968 (‘Act’). The fabric on this communication could also be topic to copyright underneath the Act. Any additional replica or communication of this materials by it’s possible you’ll be the topic of copyright safety underneath the Act. Kaplan Enterprise College is part of Kaplan Inc., a number one international supplier of instructional companies. Kaplan Enterprise College Pty Ltd ABN 86 098 181 947 is a registered greater schooling supplier CRICOS Supplier Code 02426B.