Fed.R.Proof 804 exceptions to the rule in direction of hearsay-when the declarant is unavailable as a witness.1.Negligence movement arising from an car collision. Plaintiff claims Defendantâscar crossed the center line and struck Plaintiffâs automotive. To point out that it was Plaintiffâscar that crossed the center line, Defendant calls Zed, a passenger in Plaintiffâs automotive,and asks Zed if it isnât true that, after the accident, Zed admitted to a police officerthat she grabbed Plaintiffâs steering wheel as a joke and that the automotive veered left,crossing the center line. Plaintiff objects on hearsay grounds. How should the courtrule?2.An identical case. Suppose Zed refuses to answer the question regardless that the courtroom docket ordersher to take motion. Defendant now calls the police officer to whom Zed made thestatement, and asks that individual individual to relate what Zed said. Plaintiff objects on hearsaygrounds. How should the courtroom docket rule?