Grading Guidelines for CLC Worldwide Commerce Case Examine AnalysisPartIEarnedPoints65Grading Guidelines for CLC Worldwide Commerce Case Examine Evaluation Due Endof Module 8Provide your teamâs responses to the questions listed beneath theAssignment for Module 5 â CLC Worldwide Commerce Case Examine. Minimum1,500 phrases in APA type, utilizing right financial phrases coated in thethreaded dialogue and textual content e book:Describe stability of the countryâs foreign money on the overseas trade marketand whether or not the worth of the greenback impacted the chosen countriesâforeign money 1.zero pt10Analyze the general financial well-being for every nation and providerationale in your statements. Distinction two or three key financial factorsfor your chosen nations with the U.S. financial system, and remark 1.zero ptIIFor every nation, your evaluation should embody the next 2.5 pts:a. GDP (it’s possible you’ll use the acquisition energy parity figures).b. Per capita GDPc. GDP progress charges for the previous 5 yearsd. Share of GDP spent on army expenditurese. Inhabitants and Inhabitants progress charges for previous 5 yearsf. Human Growth Index Rankings â general and by categoryAnalyze whether or not the commerce flows recognized mirror the idea ofcomparative benefit and supply your rationale 1.zero pt.Meets the 1,500 phrase minimal:Writing in APA format (Use the APA template in Doc Sharing): 1.zero ptTitle web page/cowl sheet DeniseIntroduction paragraph Mimi-at least three sentencesConclusion paragraph David-at least three sentencesIII5IV10Mix all data to create 1 paper and guarantee it meets APAformatting DeniseCorrectly cited utilizing APA On-line References:Seek the advice of the âNo Wikipediaâ announcement for hints on appropriateInternet websites to make use of as references.Go over fastidiously the APA reference supplies on the right way to cite originalsources within the textual content of your paper utilizing parenthetical citations, and the way toformat the Reference web page and a complete paper.Particular person participation within the venture:Well timed involvement within the dialogue with different staff members: zero.5 ptProvided enter equivalent to information, references or evaluation as a member of theteam: zero.25 ptsParticipated in reviewing and enhancing the proposal: zero.25 ptLate Deduction (10% or 1.zero factors per day)# of days:V90Whole